LogoHeader
1-800-869-5115
We welcome your inquiry.

USAGOLD Coins
USAGOLD Menu BAR

Welcome to the USAGOLD Gold Discussion Archives. The archives of this gold discussion forum are a treasure trove of information to educate investors about protecting their wealth through portfolio diversification with private gold ownership. The discussion forum also covers the wider issues of the past, present, and future role of gold in international monetary policy and the dynamics of the modern gold markets...

 

(Discussion Forum Hall of Fame)

(The Gold Trail)

("Thoughts!" by ANOTHER)

 

The opinions posted by all guests are expressly their own and do not necessarily represent the views of the management or staff of USAGOLD - Centennial Precious Metals. The hosting of the public discussion shall therefore not be construed as an endorsement by USAGOLD - Centennial Precious Metals of any of the opinions posted here.

 

FORUM ARCHIVES
Select date of the archive you wish to view

Month Day Year
Archives date back to September 22, 1998


WELCOME TO THE ARCHIVES!

(View Today's Discussion) (View Previous Day's Discussion) (View Next Day's Discussion)

ARCHIVED DISCUSSION FROM 11/9/2002
All times are U.S. Mountain Time

(Yesterday's Discussion.)

Sierra Madre (11/09/02; 23:56:10MT - usagold.com msg#: 89183)
Idle to compare M1, M2, and M3 with gold stocks...

Or to talk of regaining stability once more, with a "return to gold".

It is not going to happen. Things have gone much too far.

The world's productive structure and debt structure are beyond salvation.

What will have to happen, is a tremendous overhaul which will leave the world in, to us who live these days, a completely unrecognizable form.

Gold will be extremely important in the period ahead, but it will not figure in the plans devised by nations or their governments. It will be vitally important to individuals, you and me...

The forest has been chopped down, there is nothing to be done but wait, until it grows again - if it ever does. And we won't see the day when the forest flourishes once more.
In the history of mankind, Institutions are never re-established. "You can't go home again." We shall not live to see the day when any currency is gold and any bills are redeemable in gold. Not even the Euro.

Not only is it a question of productive structures and debt; it is a question of morality that has disappeared. And also, a question of populations that want something for nothing, and will not have it any other way. That precludes real money.

Populations used to be ruled by their morality (by and large). Today, they are ruled by offering them - paper money. What other means of ruling is there, today, except by bribing the masses? After paper money cannot be used any further, the masses will be ruled by the whip and the firing squad.

The circle has gone around, and we are back to pre-Hammurabi times. Even 5,000 years ago, people and rulers were never godless atheists, not even the cruelest despots ignored Divinity. Our world is in a situation worse than any in history, for vast numbers of population and rulers are atheistic, something never seen before in human history.

You think the "Dark Ages" are in the past? We are IN the dark ages, far darker than those of the IV to the XV centuries. Technology - yes; but it will evaporate in the intellectual, moral and religious darkness stifling the world.

Gold: get some, and if you can, hang on to it.

Sierra


mudr (11/09/02; 23:28:41MT - usagold.com msg#: 89182)
To Gandalf the White
Sir, I am sorry rhat my contest entry did not answer the question in rule # 7. Please amend my post, although NOT my guess. I would add these first lines to my origional:
Buying GOLD now may very well be like buying GOLD in the $60's at $35 an ounce. But two things to remember are that it took time and included correction along the way.

(Then continue with my origional post)

There's my guess. Having been shook out of my favorite gold mine stock by its ups and downs, I am firmly convinced that the best way to be in this GOLD bull market is to buy at a reasonable point and hold on. The POG may fluctuate and the same old "fear talk" may be posted on the boards that was posted when GOLD was trying to break $300, but today the price is well over that amount. The POG will zigzag it's way across the time line, but it's overall trend is UP. Buy now, wait a year or two, don't worry to much in between the times. Our fundamental reasons for joining the GOLD bull market has not changed nor will it change with the daily fluctuations. Hold on tight. Good luck to all and thanks for all your postings.

(My origional price guess was: $$$$ 320.50 $$$$ )

Thanks.



Gandalf the White (11/09/02; 23:23:15MT - usagold.com msg#: 89181)
WELCOME Sir ManAurum !!!
ManAurum (11/09/02; 22:03:13MT - usagold.com msg#: 89177)
===
Great to have you aboard ! Now, don't be a STRANGER.
<;-)


OZ (11/09/02; 22:43:58MT - usagold.com msg#: 89180)
From Jim Sinclair
To my
Friends, the Gold community:



This is the singular most informed article ever written about derivatives by a respected media publication. I respectfully and earnestly request that each member of this community do everything in their power to get this article on as many web sites, chat sites, editors of major business publications and to investigative media. The author this article has been clearly, correctly and professionally informed. We all want our major gold producers to survive this threat and not to be burdened by it. I also respectfully suggest that you send this article to every gold and silver company you are invested in, trade in or simply follow. Both majors and juniors with new projects being developed by majors with a derivative book have a derivative problem. The recent BIS figures suggest strongly that some producers now claiming to be non-hedgers have just increased the size of their hedge books by buying more of this sewage paper but only in an offsetting specific performance obligations. They are therefore still exposed the counter party risk but only in a greater way. These items must be expunged from their balance sheets for their own best interest. I have not asked much of my friends but for gold, for the gold industry, for me and for yourself please make a major effort to see this article gets the distribution is deserves.
Thank you.
Your Fox Hole Buddy in the Gold War.
Jim

Saturday » November 9 » 2002


The rumour that won't die
Investors keep worrying about J.P. Morgan's gold hedging exposure

Steve Maich
Financial Post

Friday, November 08, 2002

Suzanne Plunkett, The Associated Press
Wall Street investment bank J.P. Morgan headquarters in New York. J.P. Morgan has denied repeated allegations that a rising gold price will trigger losses in its huge position in gold derivatives.



The rumour that J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. is facing massive losses on gold derivative exposure is the market conspiracy theory that will not die.

J.P. Morgan insisted yet again yesterday that its derivative exposure remains minimal, calling the latest rumours "false and irresponsible." But that didn't stop investors from driving the shares (JPM/NYSE) down 6.6% yesterday.

Despite the denials, thousands of investors and analysts suspect J.P. Morgan has more on the line than it's letting on. Just as they did when Barrick Gold Corp. and Placer Dome Inc. slipped last summer on concerns about their extensive hedging strategies, investors are complaining about a lack of transparency in derivatives trading, and a general distrust of complex financial structures.

One former brokerage credit officer, now working as an independent analyst, said the market has very little faith in assurances about risk exposure when they aren't backed up by hard data.

"To see what some of these companies have as real exposure and then hear their public statements, it just boggles the mind sometimes," he said. "You just don't know, and that's the point."

J.P. Morgan became heavily involved in forward gold contracts in the 1990s when the commodity price was in a slow decline. Market watchers at the time said gold was going nowhere in the new global economic environment, and the derivatives market allowed banks like J.P. Morgan to extract profits from a marooned asset class.

As far as most analysts are concerned, J.P. Morgan's massive derivatives program amounted to a short position on the price of gold. And with gold prices up 17.5% in the past year, speculation is swirling that the bank is now taking a serious pounding.

How big the losses are, is a matter of endless debate.

David Hendler, a bond analyst at Creditsights Inc., an independent research firm in New York, discussed the gold question in a Sept. 23 report to clients. He concluded that there is not enough public information released by the bank to precisely determine the risks, but there are a few clues that suggest reasons for concern.

First and foremost is J.P. Morgan's extensive participation in the derivatives market, he said. In all, the bank holds about US$26-trillion in futures and options contracts, or roughly 50% of the overall market. That's more than twice the size of the entire annual U.S. gross domestic product.

J.P. Morgan has reduced its gold contracts over the past year, but it is still relatively overexposed compared to other major banks, Mr. Hendler said. At the end of the second quarter Morgan's gold contracts were worth US$45-billion on a notional basis. Citigroup, the largest financial services company with about 50% more total assets than J.P. Morgan, has just US$12-billion in gold derivatives.

Notional value isn't a true reflection of the bank's risk, because it refers to the potential maximum value of a contract. But even a writeoff of 5% of its total gold contract would represent a loss in excess of US$2-billion, greater than the bank's total net income in 2001.

Like all banks, J.P. Morgan has stress-tested its portfolio and insists that even in its worst-case "value at risk" scenario, its gold contracts would cut just US1˘ per share from its 2003 earnings. But, like all banks, it refuses to go into the specifics of trading strategies, or how they arrive at their risk models, as these are proprietary secrets.

If the denials are starting to ring hollow, it's because J.P. Morgan has had to issue so many of them in recent months.

The bank is trying to recover US$965-million in losses from doomed derivatives transactions with Enron Corp. The insurance companies involved maintain the deals were tantamount to fraud and they've refused to pay. The bank also faces a variety of lawsuits arising from its role as financier to Enron and WorldCom Inc. The bank has denied all allegations of wrongdoing, and so far hasn't taken a provision for the potential losses, insisting that they'll be vindicated.

Back in July, Kathy Shanley, an analyst at Gimme Credit, an independent bond research firm, said "there is no way to responsibly quantify the ultimate financial impact of the current investigations."

J.P. Morgan is also at the centre of a Securities and Exchange Commission investigation into allegations that the bank forced clients to buy more shares of bank-led IPOs in the after market to ensure new issues surged in their first few days of trading. Again, executives have denied the charges, but investors are well aware that Credit Suisse First Boston paid US$100-million last year to settle similar charges.

For a bank that saw third-quarter profits plunge 91% thanks to a slew of credit writeoffs, all the outstanding questions are creating an unappealing picture.

In an environment like this, whispers about multi-billion dollar derivatives losses are finding fertile ground among nervous shareholders.

smaich@nationalpost.com


© Copyright 2002 National Post








ax (11/09/02; 22:29:07MT - usagold.com msg#: 89179)
@MIKAL

Mikal -

1.

in line with your idea of a currency linkage I
think it would help us all to stop relating gold to its
price in various currencies and do the opposite - always
relate a currency in terms of its value in gold -
the " absolute" currency.

for instance:

Fri 11-08-02 the USD = 96.89 mg of gold

the Yuan Renminbi = 11.71 mg of gold

the Euro = 98.15 mg og gold

and so forth.

2.

I think your thought of adding m1 plus m2 and m3 to see
how much of that sum is currently covered by gold reserves
is an interesting one. Do you have any current figures
for these aggregates?

3. I would also be interested to know the total current valuation of all residential homes in the U.S. as
another comparative figure. Do you have any idea?


ax (11/09/02; 22:08:14MT - usagold.com msg#: 89178)
@MIKAL

Mikal, I think you are correct that currencies could be
linked. However, the need for a gold "stabilizer" ie
larger tonnages of gold reserves for each of the
participating countries in such a linkage, would even more
necessary than it is now. This is because there would be
a greater need to smoothe out fluctuations in the economic
stability factors within each country so participating.
For instance, when a currency such as the USD , now the
world's reference currency, weakens because of the multiple
factors such as are now weakening it, the need for a greater
tonnage of an "absolute" gold reference within the treasury
increases in importance. It is now important for the USD
to be so stabilized, but would, in a future linked currency
set up,be important for that component of the linked
currency which was represented by the USD component.

Basically, the more weight of "absolute" gold reference
within each of the major central banks, particularly that
of the United States, the better it would be for future world currency stability, leading to world economic
stability, led by stability within the United States.



ManAurum (11/09/02; 22:03:13MT - usagold.com msg#: 89177)
$$$$322.40$$$$
Is buying gold now like buying it at $35 an ounce in the late 1960's?

The opportunity to gain from a purchase of gold in the late 60's was bigger imho. Today, the potential price rise in gold may be smaller than in the late 60's, but our ability to capitalize it is greater.

By the late 60's, the price of gold had been set at $35 for approximately 35 years. For the vast majority, $35 gold must have been like a fact of nature and taken for granted. Only the more astute and shrewd investors could have predicted that the US would go off the gold standard, which then led to the dramatic rise in gold in the 70's and beyond. Only the very few saw the eventual price rise, and they took the lion's share of the investment gain. The average investor was probably kept out of a good part of the rally by the restrictions in gold ownership by the US government.

Today, there are quite a few people who predict a dramatic rise in the gold price (although we are still very much the minority). The gain we experience may be smaller. Gold would have to rise to approximately $7,800 to reach the same percentage gain as when gold went from $35 to $850. $7,800 gold might happen, but I predict not. Nevertheless, with all the gold products available today (eagles, maple leafs, pandas, krugs, etc.) and with gold ownership legal, we have a greater ability to capitalize on the price gain and to protect our wealth.

P.S. This seemed like the perfect day to submit my first post. I received my first order from USAGold today: 3 St. Gaudens. Thank you to USAgold for the services you provide and thank you to all the knowledgeable and wise posters I have read over the last year of lurking.

(By the way, if the US continues to relentlessly depreciate its currency, we could see $7,800 gold. Hang on for the ride!)



seagull (11/09/02; 21:47:22MT - usagold.com msg#: 89176)
$$$$ 320.7 $$$$
As already mentioned by others, the POG has inflated from the late ‘60s to the present by a factor of about 10, but as this inflation is seen in all goods and services, the relative price of gold has remained stable.

But it is the backdrop that is different.

Back in the 60's:
1.public interest in the financial markets and certainly the gold market was miniscule compared with the present, and in some countries, gold ownership was illegal

2.there was general public consensus about the intrinsic value of gold as the pinnacle of absolute value, whereas currently TPTB do all in their power to denigrate gold as a ‘barbarous relic’.

3.There was probably manipulation of markets, but it wasn't as blatant or as desperate as in the present
·
4.The social and economic fabric of developed countries was considerably more stable
·
5.The currency of those nations was backed by something a little more substantial than is the case today

So, while the POG has remained relatively constant, its absolute value has escalated by a factor of 10, and TPTB are doing all they can to obscure this from a more-informed public (well, some are!) in a vain effort to hold onto the reins. Gold has been the absolute store of value for thousands of years, and there is absolutely nothing to replace its position or its historical significance.


Tacitus (11/09/02; 21:38:08MT - usagold.com msg#: 89175)
Bravo Kludge
Dear Kludge,

Thanks for putting in a good word for the Commander-in-Chief.

I'll keep an eye open for your postings. But for now I'm crashing.

By the way, what does "Kludge" stand for?

Over and out.
Tacitus


mikal (11/09/02; 21:12:58MT - usagold.com msg#: 89174)
@ax
As the US dollar will need to be devalued to pay off the external trade deficit and inflate away the budget deficit, will this lay the groundwork for a new linked currency coordinated with the Euro, Yen, Remnibi, Pound, Franc and Dinar? Perhaps invoking the gold cover clause, which is still on the books, to provide a partial backing to the US$, using gold in the Central Bank reserves. The Euro, as you know, is 15% "backed" by gold, whereby the large gold reserves in the European Central Bank (ECB) are revalued periodically (currently every 3 months, this is flexible), called mark to market, (ie- marked to the market price) the current London gold fix. As I write, the Euro is above parity with the US dollar and near a historic high which will soon be left far behind. As gold revalues, the Euro reserve's value increases, strengthening their currency, credit standing and clout internationally, Attracting more and more foreign investment in official(gov't) and private(corporate) bonds, currency, real estate, factories, banks, and more. A nominal percentage Au backing would guarantee the fiscal discipline needed to restore a measure of confidence to currency markets and begin to heal the US and world's economic systems.



Golden Bear (11/09/02; 21:10:13MT - usagold.com msg#: 89173)
James Grant on Inflation and Greenspan's fears...
http://www.nbr.com/
"...KANGAS: Do you believe Wednesday's half percent cut in the Fed funds rate marked the end of the down trend for interest rates? And, in any event, why would the Fed cut so aggressively while at the same time elevating its view of the economy from weak to neutral?

GRANT: Well, central bankers, no more than diplomats, are held to the literal truth in our society. And I think what the Chairman of the Fed meant to say is I am really scared. I'm cutting the rate by one half of one percent, but I'm going to say I'm not scared.

KANGAS: Do you think the Fed sees the threat of deflation?

GRANT: Interestingly, the Fed is worried about the threat of no inflation. And think about what that means. It means that the powers that be want the currency in which our savings is denominated, they want that currency to depreciate. Inflation is a part of the institutional structure of American finance and the absence of inflation is a very worrisome thing to the Federal Reserve system. So levered, that is to say, so indebted is the economy that the absence of inflation presents, paradoxically, a big problem. And I think that we all ought to reflect on what that means. What it means is that the dollar is meant to depreciate. That is the public policy of the United States government and we ought to take, I think, the proper steps to offset that..."


mikal (11/09/02; 20:59:50MT - usagold.com msg#: 89172)
@ax
I like your reasoning! I have seen estimates based on a gold cover for M3 money supply as well as M1 money supply for varied results. But concluding, like you, the US would need to somehow purchase a large gold cache. Why not, for fun base an estimate on covering M1+ M2+ M3? There are many possibilities, and many individual perspectives that could establish something closer to definitive than we have already seen.

Gandalf the White (11/09/02; 20:27:20MT - usagold.com msg#: 89171)
TA TA TAAA, TA TA TAAA, TA TA TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA !!!
The Dec '02 POG Settlement Guessing CONTEST !
TENTH UPDATE <;-)
as of 20:10 Denver time 11/09/02
A total of 54 Prognostications to date !
Get your Number soon as the rush will be on MONDAY !
(As my Crystal Ball says that the total will be 150+ !!!!!) TA TA TAAA, TA TA TAAA, TA TA TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA !!!

TENTH UPDATE <;-)
as of 20:10 Denver time 11/09/02
A total of 54 Prognostications to date !
Get your Number soon as the rush will be on MONDAY ! <;-)

The December 2002 COMEX Gold Contract SETTLEMENT Price on :

11/04/02 was $318.7 with a High = $319.3 and Low = $317.5
11/05/02 was $318.6 - $0.1 High = $320.2 and Low = $318.3
11/06/02 was $317.9 - $0.7 High = $318.3 and Low = $317.2
11/07/02 was $320.9 +$3.0 High = $321.5 and Low = $319.3
11/08/02 was $321.7 +$0.8 High = $323.3 and Low = $320.6

(looks as if Sir 18K is "KING of the HILL", at this point !) <;-)
---
THE RULES --
1) THIS Contest consists of TWO Portions --- A Price Prognostication and a Discussion Statement !

2) The Winner is the Price Guess closest to the Settlement price of the COMEX (most active) December 2002 Gold Contract (GC2Z) on the date of (revised) TUESDAY the 12th of November.

3) Price "Guesses" shall be stated in Dollars and tenths !
(Such as $543.2)

4) "Guesses" shall be SHOWN in the SUBJECT location AND enclosed in markers of "Dollar Signs" so as to be OFFICIAL ! Such as $$$$ 543.2 $$$$

5) ONLY one "Guess" per Knight or Lady is allowed, and once that "Guess" has been "taken" -- no one can duplicate it !! FIRST COME has rights to that "Guess".

6) HOWEVER, All "Guesses" MUST be posted before the clock in Denver strikes HIGH NOON on (revised) MONDAY, November 11th.

7) AND MOST IMPORTANTLY, ****** as this part MUST accompany the Price prognostication, OR the price entry SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED!
-- A short discussion (at least a thirty word paragraph) about the QUESTION --

"Is buying gold now, like buying it at $35. an ounce in the very late 1960's ?"

----
THE PRIZES !!
To the person with the exact or closest "Guess" to the December ‘02 (GC2Z) SETTLEMENT price on (revised) TUESDAY, November 12th ----- an ANTIQUE PRIZE of a German 20 Mark GOLD coin containing 0.2304 ounces of GOLD !!!
Look at one of these at this LINK supplied by The Town Crier --

http://www.usagold.com/onlinestore/special.html

ALSO, the "Runners-up" shall each receive a U.S. SILVER EAGLE containing one ounce of PURE SILVER ! (Rich, Did you see that ?)

ENTRIES sorted in order of DECREASING Values !

$$$$8,752.0$$$$ The Invisible Hand (11/5/02; 01:02:05MT - msg#: 88788

$$$$3,231.2$$$$ Clint H (11/04/02; 14:04:30MT - msg#: 88732

$$$$ 543.2 $$$$ Gandalf the White (11/04/02; 12:41:44MT - msg#: 88729

$$$$ 399.8 $$$$ Believer (11/4/02; 17:28:40MT - msg#: 88752

$$$$ 372.5 $$$$ techbull.... (11/05/02; 06:58:01MT - msg#: 88799

$$$$ 346.2 $$$$ drawmax (11/06/02; 07:57:48MT - msg#: 88893

$$$$ 345.0 $$$$ Sundeck (11/4/02; 20:36:14MT - msg#: 88768

$$$$ 340.0 $$$$ GoldnSilver2002 (11/05/02; 02:17:40MT - msg#: 88793

$$$$ 339.0 $$$$ rsjacksr (11/05/02; 05:01:21MT - msg#: 88797

$$$$ 338.4 $$$$ gvc (11/04/02; 15:15:16MT - msg#: 88739

$$$$ 336.8 $$$$ PCV1 (11/04/02; 22:06:09MT - msg#: 88776

$$$$ 333.7 $$$$ auenboy (11/06/02; 22:37:19MT - msg#: 88950

$$$$ 332.2 $$$$ BlackBart (11/04/02; 14:46:04MT - msg#: 88734

$$$$ 331.4 $$$$ Hipplebeck (11/07/02; 05:25:08MT - msg#: 88973

$$$$ 330.0 $$$$ Zhisheng (11/04/02; 21:02:31MT - msg#: 88769

$$$$ 329.0 $$$$ Rock (11/05/02; 15:57:42MT - msg#: 88837

$$$$ 327.6 $$$$ Kodie (11/04/02; 15:18:14MT - msg#: 88740
$$$$ 327.5 $$$$ sangrelli (11/05/02; 07:36:17MT - msg#: 88800

$$$$ 326.6 $$$$ silvergolong (11/05/02; 16:29:06MT - msg#: 88841
$$$$ 326.5 $$$$ Beach (11/04/02; 15:56:34MT - msg#: 88743

$$$$ 325.1 $$$$ Humble Pie (11/05/02; 19:09:24MT - msg#: 88853
$$$$ 325.0 $$$$ Lothar of the Hill People (11/05/02; 13:13:06MT - msg#: 88828

$$$$ 324.8 $$$$ goldenpeace (11/8/02; 08:59:57MT - msg#: 89063

$$$$ 324.6 $$$$ Cytek (11/04/02; 21:48:36MT - msg#: 88774

$$$$ 324.2 $$$$ Shermag (11/09/02; 19:13:41MT - msg#: 89168

$$$$ 323.7 $$$$ slingshot (11/5/02; 00:39:55MT - msg#: 88787

$$$$ 323.4 $$$$ J-Bullion (11/04/02; 12:57:35MT - msg#: 88730

$$$$ 323.2 $$$$ Blurrmoon (11/06/02; 12:30:20MT - msg#: 88908

$$$$ 322.9 $$$$ GratefulForGold (11/4/02; 19:31:21MT - msg#: 88764

$$$$ 322.7 $$$$ Max Rabbitz (11/08/02; 11:54:33MT - msg#: 89073

$$$$ 322.5 $$$$ NTgeo (11/07/02; 18:25:59MT - msg#: 89020

$$$$ 322.2 $$$$ Mountain Top (11/05/02; 09:40:22MT - msg#: 88808
$$$$ 322.1 $$$$ Liberty Head (11/4/02; 20:25:50MT - msg#: 88767

$$$$ 321.7 $$$$ 18K (11/04/02; 15:08:52MT - msg#: 88738
$$$$ 321.6 $$$$ Noble1 (11/05/02; 18:43:59MT - msg#: 88851

$$$$ 321.4 $$$$ a nation of one (11/07/02; 14:52:32MT - msg#: 88999

$$$$ 321.2 $$$$ kludge (11/4/02; 18:41:45MT - msg#: 88763

$$$$ 321.0 $$$$ Tevye (11/07/02; 16:28:05MT - msg#: 89012
$$$$ 320.9 $$$$ MoonHowler (11/08/02; 10:42:45MT - msg#: 89069
$$$$ 320.8 $$$$ Basil (11/06/02; 07:36:14MT - msg#: 88892

?*?* 320.5 Rule 7 mudr (11/08/02; 09:59:11MT - msg#: 89067

$$$$ 320.2 $$$$ NEMO me impune lacessit (11/06/02; 12:17:07MT - msg#: 88906

$$$$ 320.0 $$$$ Bound Spirit (11/06/02; 23:58:53MT - msg#: 88957
$$$$ 319.9 $$$$ Trapper (11/05/02; 09:30:05MT - msg#: 88806
$$$$ 319.8 $$$$ barnaclebob (11/04/02; 14:49:06MT - msg#: 88735

$$$$ 319.5 $$$$ Nibelung (11/06/02; 15:33:42MT - msg#: 88926
$$$$ 319.4 $$$$ SilverHoard (11/05/02; 16:07:31MT - msg#: 88839

$$$$ 319.2 $$$$ steady (11/04/02; 16:50:45MT - msg#: 88748

$$$$ 318.4 $$$$ VanRip (11/05/02; 11:34:35MT - msg#: 88820

$$$$ 318.2 $$$$ Frosty (11/05/02; 18:03:57MT - msg#: 88848

$$$$ 317.0 $$$$ Albatros (11/05/02; 08:38:52MT - msg#: 88803

?*?* 316.7 Rule 7 nickel62 (11/06/02; 09:04:02MT - msg#: 88896

$$$$ 316.4 $$$$ HOOSIER GOLDBUG (11/05/02; 16:51:51MT - msg#: 88843

$$$$ 307.5 $$$$ Topaz (11/06/02; 02:55:05MT - msg#: 88883

===

Your Attention Please ! The Master of the Castle, SIR MK is pleased to announce that there shall be a new "PRICE OF GOLD GUESSING CONTEST".

ALL Goldhearts present are invited to enter. The ONLY requirement is that, One must be able to POST to the Forum in order to enter. LURKERS, therefore must obtain a required FREE "Password" by visiting the webpage at:

http://www.usagold.com/cpmforum/tools/guideandsignup.html

and reading the Guidelines and Prohibitions sections, and then completing the REGISTRATION form and submitting. (Rather painless too.)

===
<;-)



ax (11/09/02; 19:23:55MT - usagold.com msg#: 89170)
How much does U.S. Gold Cover?

reference: mas (11/09/02; 18:55:40MT - usagold.com msg#: 89167)
"... government debt of well over 6 TRILLION"

Assuming the figure quoted by MAS of a " 6 trillion dollar
debt" is approximately correct, how much of this is covered
by U.S. Treasury Gold?

6 trillion dollars = 6000 billion dollars

Assuming there are 8000 tons of gold in the U.S. Treasury
and the price is roughly $321/ounce, my calculations
indicate ( please correct me if this is inaccurate ):

$ 82,524,383,000 or 82.524383 billion dollars are
covered by U.S. Treasury Gold.


82.524383/6000 = .0137540 = 1.37548 %


Only 1.37548 % of the 6 billion dollars is covered by
U.S. Treasury Gold.

Is there any doubt that either :

1. The price of gold must rise significantly to increase
the dollar value of the U.S. Treasury gold stock

or

2. The U.S Treasury must substantially increase the
gold tonnage it owns


Either way, it will require massive increases in either
1 or 2 to cover the 6 billion dollar figure more than
a very slight 1.37548 %.

Any corrections to these figures are welcomed.

ax


Golden Bear (11/09/02; 19:21:43MT - usagold.com msg#: 89169)
Max Rabbitz (msg#: 89165)
Hey Max,

No I don't think it is. I did a search and could find no direct affiliation. It's a website offering alternative views on global events, some articles being from Larouche and his staff...

I agree with your comments, I posted the link more for the anecdotal comments from various sources regarding Bush.

Larouche's website is at: http://www.larouchepub.com/eiw/

Cheers.


Shermag (11/09/02; 19:13:41MT - usagold.com msg#: 89168)
$$$$ 324.2 $$$$
"Is buying gold now, like buying it at $35. an ounce in the very late 1960's ?"

Yes and no. Although today's environment bears many of the characteristics of that era, there exist important differences that further support a gold price explosion.

First the important similarities:

1. The world again finds itself awash in U.S. dollars. The breakdown of the Bretton Woods accord and Nixon's closing of the gold window were the consequences of the dollar excesses at that time. We again find that the U.S. has overplayed its privileged reserve currency hand as evidenced by the enormity of the "big float" and the massive current account deficit. At the moment, geopolitical and economic incentives for individuals and nations to hold their dollars seem to be eroding away. Machinations of the Treasury, IMF, and assorted central banks not withstanding, the U.S. dollar is due for a hard adjustment.

2. It's all about oil. In the early seventies, the U.S. oil production peaked. That caused a shift in capital flows and wealth that was partially offset by inflating the currency. The entire world now seems poised to round out its Hubbert peak, with inevitable inflationary reactions to mitigate the pain.

3. It's guns and butter all over again. The U.S. once again finds itself embroiled in external military engagements. The war on terror, as was the war on communism, threatens to be costly, and escalating, with no foreseeable end. Meanwhile, the cradle to grave social promises remain intact. There is again to be no sacrificing of lifestyle to support the war effort, with attendant federal budget deficits as far as the eye can see.

Now the important differences:

1. Its the debt, stupid. The U.S. was then a net creditor nation, supported by a productive capital base built over more than a century. It was a nation of savers. We now see the U.S. bloated with debt at government, corporate and personal levels seemingly beyond what can ever be repaid. Productive capital investment is displaced by consumptive excesses.

Although an extreme in magnitude, the U.S. is far from alone in its debt excesses. National governments around the globe, from first to third world status, are pushing the debt envelope. Argentina is only one of the first to succumb. Personal debt levels, most notably in the Anglo nations, is also at unprecedented levels. Germany's corporate strains of late are just a few examples of corporate excesses around the world.

2. Tottering banks. A fed funds rate at 1.25%, rocketing loan loss provisions, runaway bankruptcy at corporate, national and personal levels, decimated share prices, earnings under pressure, abysmal transparency, and notional derivative exposures beyond $90 trillion. These are not the hallmarks of a healthy sector. Japans banks are on the verge of falling below the minimal capital adequacy requirements to be able operate internationally. The banks of the seventies were models of fiscal probity compared to those of today.

3. Demographics. We are an aging globe, with the populations of western nations about to place some hefty demands on the remaining productive sectors. In Canada, for example, within 20 years each retiree will have only 2.5 working age people to support them, in contrast to the present 6 workers. Pay as you go pension promises will be broken with alarming frequency in years to come.

4. Bubbles galore. We have just witnessed the bursting of what has been described as the largest stock market bubble ever. A U.S. housing bubble is arguably about to burst. The bond markets are looking bubblish of late. The Japanese have yet to come to terms with their massive twin bubbles in stocks and real estate. Add these to the above described debt, balance of payments, and U.S dollar bubbles and we get a not so pretty picture of what monetary excesses can do.

5. The call-the-lawyers syndrome. Although less tangible, there is non-the-less an increased tendency in our society to find someone else to pay for our mistakes or misfortunes. Litigation is a first recourse in many circumstances. This goes hand in hand with an erosion of personal responsibility and self sufficiency.

6. Inflate your problems away. If all you have in your toolbox is a hammer, every problem resembles a nail. The fed's response to all financial problems it encounters is to smack it with its inflation hammer. And hammer hard they do. The nail-like threat of deflation will be no different.

7. Price suppression. Today's price does not closely reflect the supply and demand fundamentals in the gold market. When this over-corrects, as all economic pendulums eventually do, the upside in dollar terms will be breathtaking.

In short, there is a now much more compelling case for preservation of personal wealth with gold than that of the late 60's era.


mas (11/09/02; 18:55:40MT - usagold.com msg#: 89167)
Comment's from The-Privateer
While we are on the subject, something of interest.

We have asked variations of this question before, but in the wake of the Fed's decision of November 6, it is highly appropriate to ask it again. What would you expect would be the fate of the currency of a nation which:

* Had by far the world's largest net external debt
* Was running an annual current account deficit of (+/-) 500 Billion
* Had not run a GENUINE budget surplus for nearly 40 years
* Was spending more than its six largest "competitors" combined on armaments
* Had a citizenry which had no savings whatsoever
* Had a stock market in a bear with prices still around 40-50 times earnings
* Had a government debt of well over 6 TRILLION
* Had a Central Bank "controlling" interest rate of 1.25%


You would expect the currency of such a nation to be losing exchange value against other currencies, would you not? Of course, the nation is the US, the currency is the US Dollar, and the US Dollar IS losing value against other currencies. On Friday, November 8, the US Dollar index closed at 104.68 - down 0.45 points on the day and only 0.26 points above its 2002 low close of 104.42 set on July 19.


The Invisible Hand (11/09/02; 18:53:02MT - usagold.com msg#: 89166)
BoE is model for 'new' ECB
http://www.observer.co.uk/business/story/0,6903,836761,00.html

Faisal Islam, economics correspondent
Sunday November 10, 2002
The Observer

The path towards Britain's possible entry into the euro will be made much easier by a radical French plan for the European Central Bank to be reformed in the image of the Bank of England.
French Prime Minister Jean Pierre Raffarin's Council of Economic Advisers recommends that the ECB adopts three major reforms to its monetary policy arrangements. If adopted, they would allay most of Gordon Brown's concerns about the institutional structure of the Frankfurt-based bank, and make his 'five tests' far easier to pass.
The council's study, by economists Charles Wyplosz and Patrick Artus, was received warmly by the French PM. The reforms would replace the ECB's confusing 'two-pillar' target with an inflation target of between 1 and 4 per cent, entirely consistent with the Britain's target of 2.5 per cent.
It argues that an enlarged eurozone should abandon its unwieldy 18-member decision-making committee, in favour of an executive committee of economists, like the Bank of England's Monetary Policy Committee.
France's position is important. It is almost certain that ECB President Wim Duisenberg will be replaced by a Frenchman in July. The favourite, Banque de France Governor Jean-Claude Trichet, is politically close to Raffarin.
==
What does this mean for gold? Only the inner circle of the executive committee of economists will hold decision power. Is this Trail Guide's hand, mind, idea or system?


Max Rabbitz (11/09/02; 18:32:12MT - usagold.com msg#: 89165)
Golden Bear@ 89161
Is that a Lyndon Larouche web site? It's OK if it is. Doug Noland has even referenced him. It's just that he should be up front about it. Although interesting I am still uncertain how stable/reliable he is. He does not reference anything and so much seems hidden.

kludge (11/09/02; 18:23:41MT - usagold.com msg#: 89164)
Tacitus, et al
My list for the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse are:

1) Y2K
2) The asian contagion
3) The falling US dollar...

Oops, sorry - been reading the archives too much and they rest heavy on my thoughts. How DID we survive against, what seemed at the time, these insurmountable challenges???

To answer your earlier question Tacitus, I guess if I had a BS from Yale and an MBA from Harvard (as our President does) - I would still surround myself with the best advisors I could find, experts in their fields, and listen closely to their advice first.

I also found interesting the posts of late on the new UN resolution on Iraq. I'd only like to point out that the 1991 war has NOT ended, we're in a cease-fire as long as Saddam adheres to the resolution he agreed to then. A quick read of UN Res. 687 will show without a doubt that he is NOT living up to the terms of the cease-fire. Some mention clandestine oil contracts, arms sales, and diverting the American citizens minds from the economy as the cause for renewed aggression with Iraq - OK, maybe - but don't forget firstly that Iraq is in breach of a cease-fire agreement!

To the weakness of the new UN resolution, Paragraph 5 states, in part:

"as well as immediate, unimpeded, unrestricted and private access to all officials and other persons"
[...]
"further decides that UNMOVIC and the IAEA may at their discretion conduct interviews inside or outside of Iraq, facilitate the travel of those interviewed and family members outside of Iraq, and that such interviews shall occur without the presence of observers from the Iraqi government"
[...]
Wonder what those "officials and other persons" will have to say once they and their families are safe?

Lastly, on what appears to me as posts from the "guilty American conscience" for having it so good when others may not; our gov't has the responsibility to see to our "Safety and Happiness" and to "insure domestic Tranquility" - considering our standard of living vs. the rest of the world, have they not succeeded? Do we not assist others when disaster strikes their country? Do they help us? I haven't heard of any "IslamCares" crates of food/blankets arriving to help our victims of disaster.

What's any of this have to do with gold? Maybe nothing, except that if the only adjoining device you can envison is a nail, then every problem might like the back-end of a claw hammer.


Tacitus (11/09/02; 18:13:53MT - usagold.com msg#: 89163)
Thanks for the Responses and now Another Question
Gentlemen,

Thanks for the insights. If you have more insights to share so that when I take over I can get things straightened out, please let me know. I'll make you my advisors if you come up with some good ones.

These past two days in the Forum, there was quite a bit of talk about what has happened in Japan thanks to their government tampering with interest rates. Could any of you get me in touch with a history or monograph or essay on this topic. In might help me find out what to expect in the US of A.

And by the way, for all of you lovers and haters of George W. Bush, check out the new documentary called, Journey's with George, produced and written by Alexandra Pelosi (daughter of Nancy Pelosi, soon to be Democratic minority leader in the House of Rep.) It can be partially viewed at HBO.com under documentaries.

Salve,
Tacitus


Max Rabbitz (11/09/02; 17:26:21MT - usagold.com msg#: 89162)
End of Goldman Sachs Gold Desk
Could the reason be that the miners are no longer willing to play the paper hedging game? GS is frustrated that miners refuse to do what they're advised/told. Without forward selling, what's in it for GS? They can't make money on analysts fees alone. Who listens to them anyway? Remember the rape of Ashanti? Are they having losses on their gold carry trade book? So they drop coverage and pretend gold is nothing and going nowhere, and get free media propaganda. I'll bet "Analyst" McConvey gets a good recommendation and greener pastures soon. He did his job.

Golden Bear (11/09/02; 15:36:26MT - usagold.com msg#: 89161)
Tacitus (msg#: 89139)
Greetings Tacitus,

no need to apologize, this is only healthy debate, which stimulates the mind...

As for...

"...I wish we could avoid the temptation to villianize the Bushes and Gores of the world. I think the vast majority of politicians have good motives. They want to find and impliment the right policies for our financial world. They just have different proposals of how to realize these common goals. Civil discourse is the key to working together to put this country on the right path, whether that be morally speaking or fiscally speaking. Otherwise we may one day degenerate into another Palestine/Israel scenario...."

Bush holding civil discourse? Ya gotta be kidding! Take a read of this and see how Bush responds to ideas foreign to his own...

http://www.bankindex.com/read.asp?ID=1425

Cheers.


Golden Bear (11/09/02; 15:03:19MT - usagold.com msg#: 89160)
Belgian (msg#: 89140, msg#: 89128)
GS nonesense
Sir Belgian,

excellent analysis and revelation of the situation, as always. Thank you.

"The problem with $500 gold is there's so much scrap in the world that any price above $350 would probably lead investors to sell some of their holdings rather than buy more, he said."

Scrap!?!? Reminds me of the story of John Law, the biggest confetti pusher in the history of finance (until Greenspan), and while trying to flee the devastation his scheme created, was supposedly caught with a hoard of bullion.

Cheers.


Belgian (11/09/02; 14:49:01MT - usagold.com msg#: 89159)
@ Tacitus
First of all Sir Tacitus, I do agree with Sierra Madre that the major part of the economical/social house has already been burned and that the remaining parts are on fire.
There is not much left as we can do or do not.
Strong trends went already too far and are therefore irreversable. Economic hyperconcentration, monopolism, regulation and intervention are in full swing. Economics of scale and exploitation/domination are un-balancing and preventing an harmonious development. Debt proliferation and competitive falsifications are murderous...etc...etc !

How would you expect to set all this back on track as to ensure peaceful prosperity for the majority, within an honest meritocraty. I'm making my considerations on a global scale and not only for one continent in particular.
But to be honest with you, I do prefer things going the Euroland way. A nice mixture of sufficient free enterprise and complimentary social engagement without falling into extremes.

But in an effort to answer your question, I would like to suggest the following :

- Decrease economic/monetary intervention drastically.
- Stop all measures that make the economy grow faster than its natural pace. No to unproductive debt and yes to default.
- Stop all forms of blind nationalism and infantilization/de-responsibilization, of the masses.
- Start a crusade to rehabilitate lost values on all domains. Stop wars and put an hold on ambitions to dominate with evil, exploitational, intentions. Live and let live !
- Guarantee genuine justice for all.

PPPfffftttt, what a question, Sir Tacitus...

But I only see extremes, building upon extremes and feel somewhat hopeless with such a naive answer.

As our mentor-host, Sir M. Kosares, talks to a wide variety of his clients about all different economic/financial options, at the stage where we presently are...one must surely find a high dosis of econ./fin., "stablity" in the possession of physical Gold. When the environment is very visibly, overheating, one feels relative comfortable with sufficient water (Gold).

All those economical/financial authorities, never come up with any straithforward strategies to avoid further detoriation or any change of course ! Have you already noticed this ? What good is it to lower 12 times IRs when nothing seems to change and when Japan is a clear to see example ? Why is there so much selectiveness in the defaults (bail outs) ? Why is intervention of all kinds, so omnipotent ? Because having reached extremes can only invite to search for more extremes !

I do realize, this is a somewhat weekend, amateur, philosophy...or an elegant effort for not having to answer your question because I have no, GENERAL, answer/solution to it. That's why I landed on this Gold University here and most probably stickt to it as long as things don't change for the better. Accidently born in 1949 at the start of the Kondratief cycle...I have that nasty feeling that I'll have to live it through the winter period of this entire cycle.
Give me a comforting smile as sign of understanding. Thanks Tacitus for letting me express myself.








Liberty Head (11/09/02; 14:22:41MT - usagold.com msg#: 89158)
Tacitus
If I had the power:
1. I would reinstall the Constitution and Bill of Rights as the supreme law of the land. This would be retroactive and all inclusive.
2. I would stop all government sponsored meddling in the internal affairs of other countries.
3. Our military would be 100% devoted to defending our country and training citizens to defend themselves.
4. All peaceful private business and mediums of exchange would be conducted at the mercy of a complete and total free-market.
5. Representation would be proportional as opposed to winner take all.


Cavan Man (11/09/02; 14:16:22MT - usagold.com msg#: 89157)
Cheers Sierra
Few see the world as it actually is. Surely there's
a solution in a political platform or a new slogan?

"What shadows we chase. What shadows we've become!"


Yukon (11/09/02; 14:01:45MT - usagold.com msg#: 89156)
Tacitus
www.nesara.org
I agree with Sierra's message below, i.e. you need more than a 10 point program to fix an entire monetary system that affects virtually every aspect of our lives.

To answer your question though, if it is true solutions to this beast that has been thrust upon us that we seek, then I believe that there is an answer. However, even with both houses of Congress on the same page, what I refer to will probably never become reality because most of our elected reps. have a vested interest in keeping the system going at all costs. Would you want to be a politician and admit that you had a hand in perpetrating great lies and knew that the government to which you were elected was operating outside its constitutional boundaries and you did nothing to stop it or call it into question? (I belive Rep. Ron Paul is the only exception here)

The answer to our problems lies in a little known piece of legislation called the National Economic Stabilization and Recovery Act (N.E.S.A.R.A.). I have studied this act in detail and believe it to be the most comprehensive and total package for providing for the following:

1. Elimination of the private Federal Reserve System and returning monetary control back to Congress where it Constitutionally belongs; which thereby provides for the U.S. Treasury to issue paper currency of two types; first that which is backed by precious metal and second that which is backed by the credit of the U.S. government

2. Restoring gold and silver coin as mandated by the Constitution, though ignored by every state in this republic

3. Providing a means to eliminate all interest on debt

I hope everyone has at least taken a cursory look at what this Bill could accomplish. I would love to hear all the great minds at this forum come out in favor of this potential legislation. I would also love to hear any criticisms of it. For as I stated earlier, I know of no other solution or idea that even comes close to tackling all three problems listed above.

Viva Liberty!

Yukon


mikal (11/09/02; 13:42:53MT - usagold.com msg#: 89155)
@Tacitus
Gloomy? What led you to that conclusion, unless you're speaking for yourself. Why don't you take your own bait and tell us just how the "chief exucutive" will wrest control from his handlers without taking a bullet like Reagan, Kennedy and their hapless forbears. Once accomplished, then give us your cheery assessment of this "recovery" and how to spread American "prosperity". Maybe a start would be to give the country's foremost scholars, scientists and statesman a strong voice in the selection of candidates who run for gov't positions. There are many qualified candidates that have been stymied in the past. Another needed reform is control over electronic ballot boxes that have illegal "back doors". And it goes without saying that most people do not even know why they vote as they do- the winner is usually the one spending the most money to make his name known.

GratefulForGold (11/09/02; 13:34:49MT - usagold.com msg#: 89154)
The virtual door opens a crack...
She first scans the room, alert for signals. Hearing no alarms, she sheepishly enters, feeling a comparable "morning after" chagrin. "Did I really say that?" she ventures. "Yes, dear, you did!"

Thank you, Mr. Gresham, for your continued acceptance. I truly appreciate it.
Thank you, Tacitus, for your gentlemanly response.
And you, too, Cometose! But don't encourage me because one of these days I'll say what I Really feel! ho.

You guys here are great and I appreciate all of you and your wisdom.

GratefulForGold (and GratefulForUSAGOLD!)


Sierra Madre (11/09/02; 13:28:51MT - usagold.com msg#: 89153)
Tacitus, your request for a ten point program, "What to do?"

Tacitus, I think you really have not grasped the problem facing the US, and also the rest of the world.

There has been an enormous malinvestment, a mistaken use of scarce resources in the US, and ALSO all over the world, mainly driven by credit-creation in the US, producing dollars for the rest of the world through trade deficits.

Malinvestment means, for instance, that you built a boat that cannot float in your farm pond. The boat is too big, not enough water depth. That's malinvestment.

Another mistaken use of capital, is burning your house down, to keep warm.

Your questions are rather like, "Propose a ten point program to fix the problem of the burnt-down house."

The house is gone, it burnt down. It is no more. There can be no solution to the problem, no financial alternative to remedy the fact that the house is gone.

All that is left, is to begin rebuilding again, with painful savings, lower standard of living for a long while, and lots of sweaty labor.

People find it hard to understand that finance cannot work magic. When the house has burnt down, it is gone; that is a fact and no amount of number-juggling is going to change the fact.

The world is going to have to go through a terrible, terrible period, and perhaps that is why Mr. Bush is in such a hurry to get a war going: to be able to attribute the decline in living standards, which will be great, to the "war effort" and rally patriotism to cover up the gigantic mess, facing the US principally; but, the whole world is in for very, very difficult times.

There are no solutions. Only work and savings, and a mass psychology more oriented to facts and away from consumerist lunacy.

Sierra


Sierra Madre (11/09/02; 13:14:04MT - usagold.com msg#: 89152)
From "The Thirties" by Malcolm Muggeridge
So MUCH entusiasm in the US about going to war!!!
"It is one of the illusions of Liberalism and all its many offshoots and affiliations, that the way to men's hearts is to offer them material benefits. If this were indeed the case, the triumph of pacifism would be assured, since there is no material benefit more precious than life, no material catastrophe more awful than death. If however, men want to live, they also want to die; and their longing for death is usually the more ardent and more easily played upon of the two, because more rarely indulged. It accumulates through monotonous, disappointing years, a reservoir of death-longing, ready to be tapped, and when tapped, producing wars, revolutions, and other upheavals. Between the two longings to live and to die, men fluctuate, making civilizations and destroying them, formulating beliefs and demolishing them, bringing order out of disorder and then disorder out of order, weaving the pattern of their history."

USAGOLD / Centennial Precious Metals, Inc. (11/09/02; 13:02:48MT - usagold.com msg#: 89151)
Your understanding of gold may well be your North Star as you navigate the future
http://www.usagold.com/cpm/abcs.html

ABCs of Au by MK

The ABCs of Gold Investing

"Gold will play a critically important role in American investment portfolios in the years to come. This book provides investors a basic education on private gold ownership from one of the nation's top experts." --Rep. Ron Paul, Texas, U.S. House of Representatives

Please Remember: It is your purchase from USAGOLD - Centennial Precious Metals that nourishes these pages.



Tacitus (11/09/02; 13:01:37MT - usagold.com msg#: 89150)
Give Me a Solution
Gentlemen,

Things are sounding rather gloomy in this chat room. So let's play a little "make-believe". Make believe that you were in charge. You are president and have total control of the government, your party held the vast majority of seats in the House and Senate and the general public was ready to go in whatever direction you wanted them to go. Mr. Greenspan is at your beck and call etc. You get the general picture.

What do we do, to turn things around. What kind of program would you put in. Lay out at least a 10 point program. In other words, where should we go from here? I think this would be interesting.

Would especially like to hear from Aristotle and Belgian.

Salve,
Tacitus


Gold N Rule (11/09/02; 12:29:25MT - usagold.com msg#: 89149)
To Cobra Too
Yes indeed, the U.S. may go the way of other empires.... not a happy thought!!

Gandalf the White (11/09/02; 12:05:15MT - usagold.com msg#: 89148)
AND NOW the real postings conclusion !!! <;-)
SO SORRY !! First time that I have ever posted something that was toooooo long for the Server !
I do not know where the ADDITIONAL data on VanRip's post came from !!! (please excuse the dangling partciple.)

==
VanRip (11/05/02; 11:34:35MT - usagold.com msg#: 88820)
"Is buying gold now, like buying it at $35. an ounce in the very late 1960's ?"

No. The urgency to own gold now is greater than it was in the 1960's, regardless whether it costs more or less in dollars. Unfolding severe economic and social problems demand that one protect his assets now in the best possible way - gold.
--
rsjacksr (11/05/02; 10:34:07MT - usagold.com msg#: 88815)
AND OF COURSE THE ANSWER TO THE BURNING #7 QUESTION IS NO. Buying gold now is not like buying it at $35 an ounce in the very late 1960's. It's better. Well now, let's see. If I have 1/2 of my information straight, if you divide M3 by the total amount of gold we are suppose to have, the numbers come up to something like $30,000 plus dollars per ounce. At today's prices, that makes Gold a steal.
Gold, get you some.
---
J-Bullion (11/04/02; 12:57:35MT - usagold.com msg#: 88730)
Buying gold now is much better than buying gold at $35 in the late sixties. Back then the gold window was about to close. Now, not only are the economic stresses to the system about to be much worse due to the massive amounts of debt, but gold is starting to come back into use as money. Add to the fact that since the mid-1990's the Fed has been printing $$$ like it's been growing on trees, the huge short gold position time bomb that's brewing, wars, and it's the only real financial insurance you can get.
---
slingshot (11/5/02; 00:39:55MT - usagold.com msg#: 88787)
Missed that boat too! I think it is the same. The attitude towards gold now by the general public is that it is a poor investment at $318.0 for they will not let lose of the paper money. In the late 1960's I do not think most people paid any attention to the POG. Thirty five dollars was plenty of money for the average J6P. I do not remember any gold coins in circulation.
Slingshot-------------<>
---
Liberty Head (11/4/02; 20:25:50MT - usagold.com msg#: 88767)
When gold was $35 an ounce, the U.S. currency was backed by silver certificates and silver coins. Now, the price of gold is relative only to paper, ink, and plated zinc slugs.
Interestingly, 35 Silver dollars are now still worth about one ounce of gold. I think we are now getting a better bargain on gold, then in 1960. Also, I can earn $320 today, easier than I could earn $35 in 1960.
---
GratefulForGold (11/4/02; 19:31:21MT - usagold.com msg#: 88764)
No, buying gold now is not like buying gold at $35/oz in the very late 60's. I don't think I had $35 to spare in the late 60's. Fortunately, I've had many $319's or so to spare in 2002! Phew! (A subjective answer regarding my ability and not gold's value).
GratefulForGold
---
PCV1 (11/04/02; 22:06:09MT - usagold.com msg#: 88776)
Early in my gold bug days, some time in the early '80s, I purchased 2 Krugerrands. Up till then I had held shares only.

I had them in my possession overnight and can still remember the weight in my hand and my feeling of wealth in those two coins. I had been underground at a few of the SA mines so had an appreciation of the sweat in their production.

The Krugerrands went back to the stockbroker's safe and I sold them at a modest profit a few weeks later. I purchased options on 10 more. I held those a couple of months and sold them again at a modest profit. I'm expecting a 'modest' rise in POG again.

I never forgot those coins and intend to buy 4 more, to hold.

The market is different now, I realise now that gold was in a bear market and my gold investments see-sawed over the years. I missed the Internet bubble and started buying mostly precious metal mutuals to add to my portfolio from 1996.

Your competition reminds me of that time and I feel that gold will again show a modest rise in the coming months. The difference from the early '80s though, is well documented by list members.
---
Cytek (11/04/02; 21:48:36MT - usagold.com msg#: 88774)
"Is buying gold now, like buying it at $35. an ounce in the very late 1960's ?" Hmm, lets compare wages. In the late sixties minimum wage was $1.60 an hour while Gold was 21 times minimum wage. Now my Dad got a job at Ford's in 67' making $4.25 an hour as an electrician and was happy as a clam. This brings Gold to 8 times his hourly wages.

Now at present minimum wage is $5.15 which makes Gold 62 times the hourly wage. If you want to compare apples to apples (21x) then the present minimum wage should be at $15. And the 8 times Gold price brings a electrician wages to $40 an hour which sounds about right. However, the guy getting minimum wage is getting ripped of at present, relative to gold.
--
Zhisheng (11/04/02; 21:02:31MT - usagold.com msg#: 88769)
By the late 1960's it had become clear to many of the thoughtful that the US was some way along the old "Road to Ruin the Romans ran", via "panem and circenses" (bread and circuses in Roman times, Government welfare and sports events in our times), and via foreign wars. Inflation was inevitable and the price of gold had to increase. Investment in gold was a way to preserve the value of ones accumulated liquid capital.

Now the US is nearing the terminus of that "Road to Ruin" and buying gold becomes a means for not merely capital preservation, but for personal and family survival. The prospective consequences of buying gold have become considerably higher.
---
Sundeck (11/4/02; 20:36:14MT - usagold.com msg#: 88768)
"Is buying gold now, like buying it at $35. an ounce in the very late 1960's ?"

In Australia, no, because gold now is about twice as expensive in Aussie dollars as it was then. In the US, yes; in fact it is probably a bit better value now than then. However it is good value in both countries because the world financial system is more precariously poised now than then, the excesses have been greater, and gambling in "sewage" wasn't around then. Finally, the US is now heading into the uncertainties of a war, while then we were heading towards stalemate in the Vietnam conflict. Enough said...
Sundeck
---
kludge (11/4/02; 18:41:45MT - usagold.com msg#: 88763)
For certain, gold was a much better deal in the late '60s at $35 an ounce, had it been legal for Americans to own it then of course. de Gaulle knew it was a steal. So why $$$ 321.2 $$$? $285.41 ($20.67 in 1933 dollars adjusted for inflation today) + 356.96 ($35 in 1944, again adjusted for inflation) / 2 = $321.2

Funny how that works out to just about it's value today, huh? Currency pegged or currency floating, gold spikes and gold valleys - over time it will average out to it's historic intrinsic value. Gold will always preserve wealth, if you want to use it to make a profit (off physical, anyway) sell it when the first case of smallpox is confirmed or the first dirty bomb goes off. Buy it back 6-12 mo's later for less. Just my opinion. Good luck all.
--
Believer (11/4/02; 17:28:40MT - usagold.com msg#: 88752)
"Is buying gold now, like buying it at $35. an ounce in the very late 1960's ?"

Well, of course not! There are some thirty years difference between the late 1960's and now. Buying it now is a completely different year. The past is gone forever, so buy it now, but you will never find it for $35/ ounce.
--
steady (11/04/02; 16:50:45MT - usagold.com msg#: 88748)
$$$$ 319.20 $$$$
"Is buying gold now, like buying it at $35. an ounce in the very late 1960's ?"

I don't know if it is or not. I wasn't even in my teens . However the federal reserve sure has printed a lot of fiat dollars since then so it seems like it is to me at the moment.
--
Beach (11/04/02; 15:56:34MT - usagold.com msg#: 88743)
Yes, I feel the price of Gold at $35 in 1960 is the same as now because it doesn't matter what the price of Gold's value is its the most precious of all. Living in Canada at this time of the year we tend to talk about the weather a lot so here's my weather forecast...its going to get *Gold* this winter...very very GOLD...Good Luck To All
--
Kodie (11/04/02; 15:18:14MT - usagold.com msg#: 88740)
"Is buying gold now, like buying it at $35. an ounce in the very late 1960's ?"

No, In My Very Humble Opinion, we are above the low for this bull market. I think buying in the 270's - 280's was like buying in the 1960's at 35.00 per ounce. Gold is still at an unbelievable low price, even now. I bought 30 oz. last week in a private placement at 326.00. I will continue to buy as the price goes up. Buying now has not hurt the weighted average cost of my stash. Buy gold. You'll never be sorry you did, no matter what the price.

My investment money is divide thusly.

Gold Bullion 49%
Natural Gold Nuggets 26%
Cash 22%
Rare Gold Coins 2%
Silver 1%

Go gold! Thanks for the contest!
--
Clint H (11/04/02; 14:04:30MT - usagold.com msg#: 88732)
"Is buying gold now, like buying it at $35 an ounce in the very late 1960's ?" It is! I may be a little early on the price of $3,231.20 but someday soon people will be asking "Is buying gold now like buying it at $318 an ounce in late 2002?
====
<;-)


Gandalf the White (11/09/02; 11:53:02MT - usagold.com msg#: 89147)
TA TA TAAA, TA TA TAAA, TA TA TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA !!!
This is NOT an UPDATE -- but, something far more important !
I have been reading the "Rule 7" paragraphs and FOUND THEM TO BE GOLDEN !!! See if you can agree.
I had been thinking about writing my story about long ago in the GOLD at $35 an ounce era -- BUT, when I read all these postings --- I just reconsidered !!
<;-)
===
This relates to the POG CONTEST "Rule 7", which states ---
"AND MOST IMPORTANTLY as this part MUST accompany the Price prognostication, OR the price entry SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED!"

-- A short discussion (at least a thirty word paragraph) about the QUESTION --

"Is buying gold now, like buying it at $35. an ounce in the very late 1960's ?"

==============
Following are SELECTED RESPONSES ("Disclaimer" -- These randomly selected posts may have been sorted for "ease of reading", education, and "impact" by an opinionated and biased person.) <;-)

---
Crash (11/4/02; 17:29:06MT - usagold.com msg#: 88753)
Gold in the late 1960's vs. gold today . . . was it the same?

In 1969, gold was trading in the low $40's after having been capped for 35 years at $35 oz. This was a significant breakout but was recognized by very few analysts. Owning bullion was still not legal for U.S. citizens. The only way to buy gold was to purchase numismatic coins.

After searching the yellow pages, I located a small coin shop in downtown Los Angeles run by a young man (19 years old) who had been a coin collector most of his life. All of my limited assets were invested in sovereigns and U.S. $20 coins. My motivation was to preserve the value of what I had accumulated up to that time. I had a very negative view of the stock market and little confidence in banks. Gold seemed to be the lowest risk alternative. The differences between then and now are great. However, there are important similarities. Then, as now, there was no way to absolutely predict the future. Then, as now, the desire to preserve the "value" of assets was a strong motivator. My analytical process was to explore and consider all the alternatives and then choose the one that seemed to provide the lowest risk. Gold rose to the top of the list in 1969. Although today's environment is different, the process of elimination once again favors gold. Today, the greatest difference is in the wealth of information and opinions available and gold's price history over the past 30 years. Since the internet and this forum have introduced me to like-minded souls, I am aware that favoring gold today is not as contrary as it was 30 years ago. The detailed analysis, interesting discussion and meteoric price projections somewhat inhibit my enthusiasm. But, times have changed. Today's case for gold is different. It is not a weaker case, but it is a different case.
---
Bound Spirit (11/06/02; 23:58:53MT - usagold.com msg#: 88957)
Just for fun, I performed a little present worth analysis to determine the compounded interest rate between Gold priced at $35/oz in 1969 and gold at $320/oz in 2002. It works out to an annual compounded interest rate for n = 33 years at approximately 6.93%. Now, if the historical average PE ratio for the S&P 500 works out to be about 13.5, the reciprocal of that average ratio represents an average annual equity return of approximately 7.41%.

So lets see, if I bought some gold in 1969 and buried it in my back yard for 33 years, I would have made just about as much if I played the stock market for 33 years. But there's one big glaring difference though. In order to realize a 7.41% annual return in equities, I would need to diligently learn about, apply, and focus intensely on, things like: Technical analysis, geo-political conditions, accounting practices, monetary policy, fiscal policy, market dynamics, corporate dynamics, CEO integrity, quarterly reports, trade imbalances, credit quality, etc, etc, etc. Day after day after day after day.

You know, a great way to create a keen sense of focus in rats is to throw one into a deep glass container and fill it half way up with water.

As far as I'm concerned, our fiat dollar, especially the one created in 1971, has created a populous of keenly focused rats…..er, I mean investors. After 31 years, its truly impressive how much effort they expend to keep their heads above water and how quickly they can react to the slightest perceived change in surface conditions.

Unfortunately, many physical gold advocates, even though they don't need to worry about drowning themselves, have had to jump in that glass container as well - primarily out of their social need to help those who are slowly drowning. They had to jump in because the only way to catch what's left of a drowning persons attention span is to engage them from within their own paradigm. Maybe, just maybe, or so the gold advocates’ hopes go, these highly focused, narrow minded investors have a small piece of mindspace left where they can still be receptive to the idea that life is better on dry land. That they can still hear that it's not only better because you can quit worrying about drowning, it's better because you're free to explore an endless variety of new paradigms - including those lofty realms of love, beauty and truth. Heck, they might even find enough time to start wondering about radical concepts like meaning and purpose. And if that happens, well, don't dwell on the past, everyone has regrets. Philosophically speaking, we all have to tread water for a time before we can find our own way out of the glass jar.

Well, so much for utopia. The truth is, there are very few gold advocates in the water for the right reasons, and far too many people drowning for those advocates to effect any real sea change. In other word's: "you can't be told about the matrix, you've got to see it for yourself" and their just aren't enough red (gold) pills to go around.

Back to the subject at hand. In 1969 the water depth was not quite over our heads and for most, the distinction between gold and dollars was not a significant one. Today, in 2002, we are just about exhausted, death is near, and the idea that our nation can reaffirm the precepts necessary to "insure domestic tranquility" exists only within that most basic of human traits – hope.
--
barnaclebob (11/07/02; 09:35:01MT - usagold.com msg#: 88983)
Back when gold was $35 per oz. a home cost $10,000, a car $2,000, and the average hourly wage was $1.50 per hour. Inflation has grown all prices X10.
The average home today is $100,000+, a car $20,000+ and the average wage is $15.00+ per hour, it's all times ten.

Gold is really a true value using the X10 equation. The equation indicates a POG @ $350, yet we can buy it at the discounted price of $315 - $325. That is until the forces of inflation/deflation and/or fear of systemic economic failure forces capitulation resulting in safe haven demand. When the financial system capitulates, gold will prove the only safe "port of call" as paper burns, X20 will only be a beginning......

Don't wait till the ship leaves port!
BB
---
BlackBart (11/04/02; 14:46:04MT - usagold.com msg#: 88734)
Trading gold in the late 1960's was difficult because it had not yet opened up to the general public but, at $35/oz is was a fantastic buy, even considering the greater buying power of the dollar at that time. I think that it is still way undervalued, which is why I, a person of limited financial means, am holding physical PMs. The silver that I hold I purchased for less than that which I held in the mid 1970's, which means that it is now a hugely fantastic buy. My holdings in the mid 1970's went to over 1000% of where I got in..what a deal! Probably more so than the late 60's, the gold that is left to extract from the earth is, of course, more and more limited, and more and more expensive to get out...IT CAN ONLY GO UP...we all know the manipulating that is happening, largely, I think, to secure the election tomorrow for TPTB. They can only hold on for so long and my figure, my guess is based on the assumption that the charade will start to fall apart after the election is secured...if it is a big win for the Repubs, they wont care what the citizens think, if it is a win for the Dems, the markets will be allowed to reflect the horrible shape of our economy in order to make it look like it is a reflection of lack of confidence in Democratic control...so let's see what the next 48 hours looks like...at any rate..the real time of reckoning is NIGH, as opposed to the late 60's..not long wait (is that 30 words)(hard for me to introduce myself in 30 words)
BlackBart
---
MoonHowler (11/08/02; 10:42:45MT - usagold.com msg#: 89069)
Yes, buying gold now is nearly identical as buying gold in the late 1960's. Gold always has been and always will be an international currency and source of wealth. Regardless of the price that gold is, it will always be a valuable commodity to own and nothing can change that. A nation's currency can rise and then fall, but gold is forever.
--
goldenpeace (11/8/02; 08:59:57MT - usagold.com msg#: 89063)
With the tide of paper currencies and manipulated derivatives far outpacing the advance in the gold price from $35 in the sixties and with the $ now on shaky ground due to the vast current account deficit, budget deficit, and Fed support operations for the banks (mandated by such a weak debt laden economy ), the gold price at $322 is a far, far better deal for savers than that which existed in the late sixties. Go physical gold!
--
Hipplebeck (11/07/02; 05:25:08MT - usagold.com msg#: 88973)
Buying gold now at $320 is exactly like buying gold then at $35. The same perception change is in the works. Wealth is being redefined. We all need a reference point when discussing something, and for now, people are using the US dollar as the measuring rod for worth all over the world. It has replaced the gold standard.

When the perception changes that the dollar is not serving this role fairly, then alternatives are considered. People naturally return to gold because of it's historical role as the surest measurement of wealth. As the consititution says, the dollar is just an adjective describing a certain amount of precious metal. Every so often, people delude themselves into thinking they are gods and can control everything. This virtual reality world of delusion always ends when it is realized that just because you make up some game that fools everyone for a while doesn't mean you have changed the laws of nature, or physics. The world needs ANOTHER way of measuring wealth and cost and value. When people stop defining things in terms of dollars and begin using something like grams of gold, then we will have an economic system that is not subject to these games and manipulations.
---
NTgeo (11/07/02; 18:25:59MT - usagold.com msg#: 89020)
Is the situation for gold today the same as what it was in the 1960's? I am not sure it is. Much of the world (gold) production came from South Africa then, nowadays production is more widely spread around the globe. Central Banks were generally buyers of gold then but many now seem to want to get rid of the yellow metal. The dollar looks like it is going to take a heavy fall and this is positive for gold as well as the falling worldwide production. I think that the gold price will go up but fear that the "powers that be" will have some horrible scheme to puncture its rise. I hope I am wrong!
--
Tevye (11/07/02; 16:28:05MT - usagold.com msg#: 89012)
On the one hand, Yes, the price of gold today is economically similar to the price of gold in the '60's at $35/oz. On the other hand, the ability to own gold is so much easier now, not to mention legal for Americans, that No, there is no comparision. On the other hand, when my good friend Lazar Wolf finally did get married in the early 70's in America, he bought 2 gold rings, each 1oz of gold, to get around the american ownership issue. Actually, thats on his hand. If I were a rich man I could have done the same.
Gold. Its Tradition. ( and cheap at $$$$ 321.0 $$$$ )
Tevye
--
a nation of one (11/07/02; 14:52:32MT - usagold.com msg#: 88999)
Buying gold today is like buying gold at 35 per ounce in the late 1960's in that there is great potential for advancement in price. The price has been too low too long. Inflationary pressures have been building and have not yet been released or realized. Also, the majority of the public are unaware of the potential. Therefore it is much the same. We are presently in the very early stages of a long-term bull market in gold, and this one, like the previous one, is recognized only by a few. That's us, fellows. In coming years we will look back on this and it is likely that we will have real reason to congratulate ourselves and each other. I chose $321.40, instead of say, $327.10, because I think a gradual move upward is both more reasonable to expect, and more indicative of strength, volatility being an indicator not of value but of contoversy. Also, if I say that it can't possibly go to $327.10 by Tuesday, for some reason I feel that it will be more likely to do so.
--
auenboy (11/06/02; 22:37:19MT - usagold.com msg#: 88950)
Just like the late 60's the same cartel is managing the price, the same banks (some names have been changed or merged)are in trouble, the same countries are going broke or in trouble, and the same Fed, BIS, and IMF are trying to but the mess back together, fix the problem they helped create. If they fix the problem like the last time (we can only hope),I have little doubt the pundits that talk > $1000 gold will be right, and as many have said here before, the late comers, still licking their wounds from the dot com era will be lining up to buy gold at their local bank or coin dealer.
----
Blurrmoon (11/06/02; 12:30:20MT - usagold.com msg#: 88908)
As for buying gold now as opposed to buying it in 1960 at $35/oz. i dont know personally, was a young boy. however i would conjecture that to buy today is better as an investment and as a safe harbor. there are more people nowadays you know. gold supply has not grown proportionally. if looking at the price of stamps, inflation is 1,000+% so the cost basis is similar i guess. if looking at the price of gas, inflation is only about 600-700%. the extremely interesting times we have been in since the civil war are only more interesting now, as they will be even more interesting in the nearer future. buying gold now is like buying amazon.com before its' bubble i believe (imho).
--
NEMO me impune lacessit (11/06/02; 12:17:07MT - usagold.com msg#: 88906)
"Is buying gold now, like buying it at $35. an ounce in the very late 1960's ?"

No, much more like a bargain. Today's political and economic forces are going to push (unwillingly) the price of gold to unknown heights not even seen during the early -80. I also think that gold is going to be valued and traded in other currencies than US dollar. It (gold) will become one of the weapons in the future economic warfare of this planet – used by Asian and ME countries in a joint attack on several western countries. By then – in the west - it will be regarded disloyal to own gold.
NEMO
--
drawmax (11/06/02; 07:57:48MT - usagold.com msg#: 88893)
Gold is more valuable to have under your mattress now than it was at $35.00 in the late 60's. Our government and our populace is much more corrupt and we need something real and of value in our possession. Trust only in G-d, your family, and knowlege.
--
Basil (11/06/02; 07:36:14MT - usagold.com msg#: 88892)
Gold was still "remembered" as real currency by vastly more of life's pilgrims when still priced at $35 per ounce.These forums indeed help spread the word to new generations--but Joe Sixpack by and large doesn't have a clue yet. He will regretfully learn.
--
Topaz (11/06/02; 02:55:05MT - usagold.com msg#: 88883)
Is buying gold now similar to the late '60's?
NO!...Back then, the Dollar had an officially sanctioned Gold value of $35, nowadays Gold, in all it's manifestations, has a "freemarket" Dollar value of (say) $320.
The difference is profound fellow goldhearts. The former situation (60's) provided for a comparison, whereas the latter does not. Today, valuing Gold in Dollars (or ANY currency) is akin to ascribing a value of 4 Gallons to a Kilo of Wheat ie: more information is needed.
Gold-----Priceless Today.
--
Humble Pie (11/05/02; 19:09:24MT - usagold.com msg#: 88853)
The ease of buying gold at $35 an oz. in the 60' wins hands down . Sure there has been inflation in almost everything we come in contact with but the powers behind the screen still have the deck and they don't intend to give it up. $320 gold is a lot harder to come by than $35 gold was then .
--
Noble1 (11/05/02; 18:43:59MT - usagold.com msg#: 88851)
Yes, buying gold now is exactly the same as buying it at whatever price it brought in the 1960's. As it is the same as buying/accumulating it in 1860, 1760, 1660, 1560, 1460... You get the idea! Owning gold always makes sense. Over the course of history and time it's value always exceeds it's price
--
Frosty (11/05/02; 18:03:57MT - usagold.com msg#: 88848)
"Is buying gold now, like buying it at $35. an ounce in the very late 1960's ?"

First, if you look at the chart that RobotGuy posted (#88830), it clearly indicates that the 60's were nothing like today's stock market and gold market. $320 gold today will soon look much cheaper than $35.00 in the 60's especially if FOA is proves correct. Cheers to all!
FROSTY
--
HOOSIER GOLDBUG (11/05/02; 16:51:51MT - usagold.com msg#: 88843)
Gold buying now as compared to buying GOLD at $35.00 an ounce in the 1960s???

Gold buying in the 1960s was a sideline game/speculation/coin collector pastime activity! Gold buying TODAY is REQUIRED PRESERVATION OF ECONOMIC STATUS/WEALTH! With a multiply of 100 potential expansion, today's price equates to FIRESALE prices !!!!!!!
----
silvergolong (11/05/02; 16:29:06MT - usagold.com msg#: 88841)
Buying gold at ~$325 today IS LIKE buying gold in the 60s for $35 because:

* Price has been artificially manipulated for a number of years (London Gold Pool in the 60s, Bullion bank leasing & producer hedging today)

* Globe is experiencing a wave of political instability (Vietnam and nuclear standoff in 60s, terrorism and war on Iraq today)

* Runaway monetary inflation (Vietnam war spending in 60s, financial crises in 90s and 00s requiring massive infusions today)

However there are major differences as well:

* US was the largest creditor nation in the 60s; now it is the largest debtor nation

* Corporate debt in the 60s was very high by contemporary standards; Corporate debt today is MUCH higher

* Consumer debt in the 60s was virtually non-existent; consumer debt today is at all-time highs

* In the 60s, the US was the dominant economic growth story, with Germany and japan as the upstarts. Today, US is the dominant financial growth story, while real economic growth has shifted almost entirely to China.

* In the 60s, the US still supplied most of its own oil needs. Today the US is overwhelmingly dependent on foreign sources of oil. Meanwhile the importance of oil in the economy has not been reduced (despite all our fabulous technology)

* Today, a fiat dollar run amok is the world's reserve currency; in the 60s, gold (or a gold-backed dollar) constituted world financial reserves.

The ROCKET forces will be applied to the price of gold TODAY, dwarfing the price move in the 70s.
--
SilverHoard (11/05/02; 16:07:31MT - usagold.com msg#: 88839)
Purchasing gold now is IMHO different than in the Sixties. 15 years after the end of WW II with rising inflation and Vietnam coming into the picture, America still had a strong manufacturing economy. Now it has a service economy with huge balance of payments problem because of the huge importation of foreign goods. Now the purchase of gold is first an insurance policy and second and investment vehicle. With hindsight and Forty years of fiat currency and a weak economy, it is now imperative to purchase gold (silver).
--
Rock (11/05/02; 15:57:42MT - usagold.com msg#: 88837)
Hi all, nice reading all the posts. You guys and gals are awesome! I hate missing some of the postings but I try and visit the castle as often as possible. I think buying gold now IS probably like that in the late 60's because although times change people generally don't change. The majority of investors back then were probably into the fad stocks of that time as they are today thus treating gold like an unwanted stepchild. Although I wasn't old enough to really grasp those times in the late 60's concerning the precious metals I can only assume and we all know what happens when one assumes.

Cheers,
Rock
--
Lothar of the Hill People (11/05/02; 13:13:06MT - usagold.com msg#: 88828)
In the 60's the families of my clan were content with the daily gathering and selling of the bat guano plentiful in our cavern home. This great and seeming boundless (and renewable) resource was seen to all as the store of wealth for my people. Little was know or understood of the wealth preserving power of gold.

Over these years my clan has grown to a great number--we have outgrown our bat population. Every family has acquired cell phones and computers for every person--Electronics which use gold. And many have decorated themselves with gold jewelry. From our years of dependency upon the bat's, my people understand supply and demand.

Today, my clan seeks gold as a more reliable store of wealth and we observe that the guano/gold ratio has remained constant over these many years--as good for us today as it was in the 60s.

We will talk of this again. I am Lothar, of the Hill People.
---
VanRip (11/05/02; 11:34:35MT - usagold.com msg#: 88820)
"Is buying gold now, like buying it at $35. an ounce in the v not gett4(8 ťP4,ę0nterest back4'‚ŕand financing in order to get elected, rather than a constituency that rejects hearing the truth and accepting it). So, where do we go from here? Our president is only a politician that made it to the Big Game. And, in my limited understanding of our current one, he hasn't too many original thoughts so he relies heavily on his closest advisors (and he is very intolerant of dissent...to the extent of having small town newspaper personnel fired for unflattering or opposing opinions). That's where I begin to shudder. I think he's ignorant of practically everything except "telling them what they want to hear, in a good ole’ boy fashion". If he has intelligence, I firmly believe it's all directed to cronyism (his "advisors") and furthering his father's and grandfather's (Prescott Bush, who made his fortune dealing in arms during WWII) (and probably those before them but I haven't studied the Bush family tree) instruction. In my book, the man's main talent is how to con the people and sell whatever is his latest product (which, unfortunately for us, is the fate of the US). I've seen enough to believe that those Saturday Night Live parodies were based on fact, not just an easy laugh. We have a driven man, with a script that many want to hear (after all, scare the American public by having some "war devastation" actually occur IN THE US, ON OUR SOIL, and we're ready to bomb the hell out of the rest of the world to get the SOB who has the audacity to do that to such a peace loving country who much of the world (muslim) resents because we love "peace and freedom.") (BTW, I am SO sick of hearing how they resent our "freedom" and that's why they hate us!) At the same time as the public is roused to go after those terrorists, the administration manages to sneak in a few freedom curtailing new laws or Executive Orders (Homeland Security), it allows a few of its energy buds to get a few new contracts, get its federal judges appointed and approved, etc. Give me a break -- if anyone thinks the current administration gives a rat's about the American public, they are in for a very rude awakening! <br><br>War is a GREAT diversion (it hides a multitide of "sins" (or what they don't want you to look at)). Until it finaly HITS HOME.<br><br>I'm sorry for this tirade. BUT, if we Americans want to survive, we need to start thinking outside of what WE WANT. We have been so spoiled for so long that we actually believe (because we want to) our own (politicians') hype!<br><br>GET GOLD (AND SILVER FOR EVERY DAY PRACTICALITY) NOW! Ignore the hype. Don't buy the BS. Protect yourself...do you think they will??<br><br>OK, Tacitus, you know where I stand in my political beliefs! Unfortunately, I know of no Democrat politician that I think any more highly of, so I can't argue "politics." I am not in favor of the "democratic - socialist" programs of free lunches. Nor am I in favor or policies that favor the upper 1¨f the public ("cronies") which seems to be the current administration's bent. Unless, of course, our PM holdings should ever catapult US into that category! Ha! Ho!.<br><br>Sorry for my rambling...that seems to be who I am!</font><br><br> <!--89129end--> <!--89128begin--> <FONT COLOR


Cometose (11/09/02; 11:27:48MT - usagold.com msg#: 89146)
Grateful for Gold Post 89129
Would you please now tell us how you Really feel!!!!

I agree....Like hearing your posts....

We all learn by releasing....it enables our brains more sythesis of informaiton when we post.

GOLD IS GOING TO BE......

COMETOSE


CoBra(too) (11/09/02; 10:41:43MT - usagold.com msg#: 89145)
@Gold N Rule - Re: War in Italy
GNR - it's not against the US as such and certainly not against Americans.

Though, as an Austrian I see it as a protest against globalization, NWO and hegemonial and imperial demands on the understanding of being the last surviving superpower and the reserve currency - paid up by the poor getting poorer.

Considering that the opposition first formed in Seattle in a meaningful way - it may be time to reflect on what caused this opposition?

Globalization didn't really help Argentina, SE Asia nor Black Africa - The helpful? hand-outs of the IMF and/or the World Bank only meant governance and enslavement for countries having accepted the status quo! only helped the US! ... and that's a fact!

It helped the status quo of the US to keep inflation in check by pricing every product in (future's hedonistic markets)of the gobal reserve currency - albeit the fact that the country has the largest trade, budget and overall deficits in history.

The empire of debt on every walk of life, while still having its great capacity of R&D, military supremacy and pricing power may be on its way to meet the destiny of prior empires.

Killing gold ... will have its repercussions ...

Musings from a pro US -Austrian - cb2



silvercollector (11/09/02; 10:18:36MT - usagold.com msg#: 89144)
There will be war
http://www.nationalpost.com/home/story.html?id={55CF529F-E332-4E04-BD38-08623406AEE8}
"Bush's domestic victory is a foreign victory"

Bush now calls the shots regarding Iraq. An Iraqi minister has already claimed some of the resolutions will be impossible to acheive.


Gold N Rule (11/09/02; 10:04:27MT - usagold.com msg#: 89143)
DEFLATION: THE CLEAR AND GROWING DANGER
http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/nov2002/nf2002118_7388.htm
DEFLATION: THE CLEAR AND GROWING DANGER

snippit:


So far, the Fed has been the economy's stalwart supporter. Chairman Alan Greenspan has convinced his colleagues to
aggressively slash the fed funds rate, by 4.75 percentage points in 2001 and an additional half-percentage point this year.
U.S. fiscal policy has buttressed the economy, too, as a $250 billion federal budget surplus in 2000 was transformed into a
$160 billion deficit in fiscal 2002.

Still, fiscal-policy management has been largely inept. The Bush Administration's tax cut, largely skewed toward the wealthy
in future years, has done little for the economy. Its economic summit in Waco, Tex., was a joke. And both Congress and the
White House have failed to deal forcefully with the recent spate of corporate-accounting scandals.

TOO HIGH A PRICE. Deflation is still considered a remote possibility by many economists and policymakers. But remember
President Herbert Hoover, who famously forecast in 1930 that, "prosperity is just around the corner." At the time, his was a
reasonable bet, since the economy had declined in only seven of the years from 1869 to 1929. Only once during that time
did business activity contract for two consecutive years.

Of course, it turned out to be a disastrous forecast for the country -- and a mistake that eventually cost him the nation's
highest elected office. Now, like then, if America's leaders underestimate the prospects for deflation, the price the nation must
pay in terms of economic damage would be too high. Deflation is a fearful risk. Washington should pull out the stops now to
prevent its emergence.


COMMENT: LET'S SEE THE TYPE OF SUPERFICIAL ANTICS WASHINGTON USES TO APPEAR AS THOUGH THEY'RE HELPING THE ECONOMY


Mr Gresham (11/09/02; 09:56:30MT - usagold.com msg#: 89142)
GfG
You are a treasure!

Gold N Rule (11/09/02; 09:22:22MT - usagold.com msg#: 89141)
450,000 or More Protest War In Italy!!!
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=574&ncid=721&e=4&u=/nm/20021109/wl_nm/italy_globalisation_dc

snippit:

European Anti-War Rally Streams Through Florence
20 minutes ago

By Luke Baker

FLORENCE, Italy (Reuters) - More than 450,000 anti-war protesters from
across Europe marched through this Italian Renaissance city on Saturday,
denouncing any U.S. plans to attack Iraq.

Fired with anti-American sentiment and angered by
a tough new U.N. resolution to disarm Iraq,
European activists joined forces in a carnival
atmosphere and marched together singing
Communist anthems and blowing shrill whistles.
"Take your war and go to hell," one of the colorful
banners read. "No to war," said another.

The rally marked the climax of the first European
Social Forum, which brought together
anti-globalisation campaigners from across the
continent for four days of talks and concerts.

The forum was planned months ago, with tens of thousands of participants
from dozens of countries stretching from Portugal to Russia. Delegates
discussed topics from debt-reduction to support for the Palestinian uprising.

But organizers said the march was given added relevance by Friday's
unanimous vote in the U.N. Security Council, which gave Iraq a last chance to
disarm or face almost certain war.

Authorities estimated more than 450,000 protesters were on the streets, and
people were still streaming in from a fleet of buses and trains hired for the
occasion.

Organizers said the crowd could swell to more than a million people, making
it one of the biggest rallies ever seen in Italy.


COMMENT: If this reflects global sentiment to America then "Made In America" may become a dirty word and our goods could be boycotted and instead of "As The World Turns" It'll
be.."As The Dollar Falls" .......


Belgian (11/09/02; 09:19:01MT - usagold.com msg#: 89140)
@ Golden Bear : GS nonesense
Indeed, fellow Goldmeister, GS's explanations are nothing less than idiocy. But they are definitely "Gold" insiders and belong to the inner core of the gold-club !
So many stocks "decimated" and the handful of goldminers left, on average, trippled their value. But this infinitesimal fraction of the Gold-business isn't of a nature, anymore, to arouse with billions of dollars.
Available physical Gold has become very scarce and is massively derivatized. Soon, the financial brotherhood cannot do business with Gold anymore, under whatever form that is. The Gold market is in the process of being dehydrated (decline in liquidity) in comparaison with what we experienced in the hyper-liquid, stock markets, during the past decades. In simplier words : how do you move so much confetti in such a tiny small Gold market ? Worse, how do you get out of it ?

When there is less and less physical gold available, because of declining offer in proportion to demand, the paper circus encounters more and more difficulties to remain liquid. A renewed physical Gold market is imposing itself. That will happen as Another pointed out.

At the present POG, the 3.000 tonnes of forward sold underground Gold has certainly reached its limits. Add to this the plunder of some private and official Gold stocks and it becomes obvious that the available physical is running short. The bullion banks are outplayed by the prolonged very low POG.

So, why should CBs have to buy Gold when there is already a shortage. This situation is our best guarantee that when POG explodes, no one in the possession of physical Gold will be inclined to sell one nanogram. These things happen with publicly trade stocks of excellent quality, also. Zero liquidity because the ultimate holders don't want to sell an excellent business (valuable). Than this stock is dispised by those who weren't able to accumulate it. Common sense, don't you think so ?

Can we therefore conclude that the best way to exterminate papergold contracts is by drying up the market with practically unmoved price-behavior ? This pattern co-incides suspiciously well with the management of the $/€ exchange rate.


Tacitus (11/09/02; 08:51:08MT - usagold.com msg#: 89139)
Sorry Guys
Dear Golden Bear, GoldNRule, GratefulForGold, and anybody else who wants to get into the fray,

Didn't mean to get people upset. I'm afraid I violated one of Mr. Kosares' rules: not to promote any particular political party. So I will try to be more careful in the future.

First, I do not fancy myself a Keynesian, rather a Hazlittian in process. However, I was looking for the strongest argument the Keynesian's would have for doing what they do, in this case lower interest rates. We can all make straw arguments on behalf of our intellectual opposites and then blow them down. I was looking for their strongest argument so that after addressing it I could be a better Hazlittian. But you didn't give me one. That's alright. But I am trying to learn by this exchange not build up my ego.(and maybe even share a little info.) Last night I had a conversation with one of my neighbors. She is an older lady dependent upon the interest she obtains from her savings. She expressed her dismay at the low rates. Now I have come to see more clearly something I should have thought of before. The lowering of rates takes money, or income from those who have and thus they are being "taxed" again and also they will have less to spend thus keeping them from participating in the market. I think we can conclude therefore, that although there may be some gains in sales thanks to lowering the interest rates there will also be loses, perhaps even a net loss. That is where I am with this topic. Still looking for insights though.


As far as politicians go, I believe there are people of good character in every party, just like I believe there are a lot of good CEOs etc. in the business sector. I wish we could avoid the temptation to villianize the Bushes and Gores of the world. I think the vast majority of politicians have good motives. They want to find and impliment the right policies for our financial world. They just have different proposals of how to realize these common goals. Civil discourse is the key to working together to put this country on the right path, whether that be morally speaking or fiscally speaking. Otherwise we may one day degenerate into another Palestine/Israel scenario.

One last thing, I have only one agenda, and that is to share what I believe to be the truth and be corrected where I am wrong and to learn as much as I can from my fellow philosophers that are on this ship with me.

All the best,
Tacitus




Cavan Man (11/09/02; 08:35:59MT - usagold.com msg#: 89138)
Hipplebeck
Bravo dear brother. You have freedom!!

Buena Fe (11/09/02; 08:33:53MT - usagold.com msg#: 89137)
Hipplebeck
Spot on Cap'

Blurrmoon (11/09/02; 08:17:48MT - usagold.com msg#: 89136)
@ Hipplebeck
Amen, brother. Agreed.

CoBra(too) (11/09/02; 07:37:04MT - usagold.com msg#: 89135)
Excerpt from Doug Noland's Credit Bubble Bulletin
"Data released today by the BIS (Bank for International Settlements) on positions in the global over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives market at the end of June 2002 point to a further acceleration of activity in the first half of the year." Total OTC derivative positions increased at a 30% annualized rate during the first half to $127.6 Trillion (up 83% since June 1998!). Interest rate derivatives expanded at a 32% rate to $90 Trillion (up 112% since 6/30/98), while currency derivatives increased at a 16% rate to $18.1 Trillion. Equity derivatives grew at a 35% rate to $1.9 Trillion, with gold derivatives increasing at a 42% rate to $279 billion."

The explosive pace of gold derivative growth clearly high-lights the desperate and untenable position some bullion banks have dug themselves into. Small wonder that rumors of potential major gold derivative losses surface with renewed fury. Denials without substance may become a bit frayed and eventually may have opposite effects.

Time's a running out - cb2

@CM - thanks, my friend for your kind words the other day. Will be in touch later.


Hipplebeck (11/09/02; 07:16:20MT - usagold.com msg#: 89134)
(No Subject)
What most people don't understand, is that the dilemma for the US is that dollar usage must grow or the whole system dies. The dollar will have to be forced onto people if they will not take it voluntarily. That is how a ponzi scheme works. If it does not grow exponentially, it dies.
No matter what the US or the UK media say, The US and UK have not gotten endorsement for attacking Iraq. The resolution that has passed in the UN says that if Iraq is in violation, then the security council will meet again to decide what action is to be taken. Bush and Blair lost to Chiraq and Putin.
The great whore of Babylon files: If the US is dependent on foreign capital so much, and there is a very large growth in asset backed security sales to keep the mortgage refinance game going, doesn't this mean that foreigners are buying ownership to US homes? Who really owns the title when the mortgage is bundled, securitized and sold?
Now that the republicans are fully in control, I expect that all the reforms that are supposed to take place to make America's business honest again will be a sham.
It is a total hoax when a corporation is fined for wrongdoing. It is a way to let the criminals off scott free while having the appearance of doing something. All they are doing is stealing from the stockholders. It's an outrage, but the common US citizen is powerless to do anything. We count on our leaders in politics and business to be real leaders, take responsibility and keep an honest game going, but it is not the case. The worship of money has corrupted all.


mas (11/09/02; 05:44:32MT - usagold.com msg#: 89133)
Nation of one
Looks like making up your mind means falling off a cliff. Wow what a snap shot. Next week should look look like???????
Got gold?


a nation of one (11/09/02; 04:19:26MT - usagold.com msg#: 89132)
el dollarini
http://quotes.ino.com/chart/?s=NYBOT_DXY0&v=d12&w=1&t=l&a=200

Looks like the dollar is about to make up its mind.


a nation of one (11/09/02; 04:04:15MT - usagold.com msg#: 89131)
deliberate actions

Deflation increases the proportion of loans that cannot be repaid. During bankruptcy procedings, property changes hands. In a fiat currency society, property has some advantages which currency does not have. And if these loans were repaid, all that would change hands would be fiat currency. Therefore deflation has an appeal to a certain type of strategy. Deflation is used for the purpose of causing tangible assests to change hands. Combined with the fact that all borrowing is inherently destructive to a society -no matter what the interest rate, the amount borrowed, or the size of the economy- deflation and inflation offer those in positions to control them a substantial opportunity to enrich themselves and others like themselves, at the expense of the economic system overall, and at the expense of the vulnerable public within that system.



Golden Bear (11/09/02; 03:42:05MT - usagold.com msg#: 89130)
Goldman Sachs Gold desk link... what a load of BS from GS...
http://quote.bloomberg.com/fgcgi.cgi?ptitle=Securities%20Firms%20News&b1=ad_bottom1&br=blk&tp=ad_topright&T=wealthstory.ht&s=APcviCRV_R29sZG1h
Goldman's New York Gold Mining Equity Analyst McConvey Fired
By Claudia Carpenter


New York, Nov. 8 (Bloomberg) -- Goldman, Sachs & Co. gold mining analyst Daniel McConvey was fired after five years on the job as the securities firm halted research on the industry amid a slump in business on Wall Street.

``I was a casualty of downsizing,'' McConvey, 47, said in a telephone interview from his home in Berkeley Heights, New Jersey. Goldman spokesman Ed Canaday in New York said the company has dropped coverage of 12 gold-mining companies that McConvey covered, including Newmont Mining Corp., the world's biggest gold producer.

McConvey joined Goldman in 1997 after three years at Lehman Brothers Inc., and before that he was a comptroller at Barrick Gold Corp. in Toronto. In May, McConvey said gold would have a hard time extending its 17 percent gain this year. Gold prices in New York are now up 16 percent for this year, trading at around $320 an ounce.

A war with Iraq is gold's best chance of climbing further, and even then it probably wouldn't go much over $350 an ounce, McConvey said.

``The problem with $500 gold is there's so much scrap in the world'' that any price above $350 would probably lead investors to sell some of their holdings rather than buy more, he said.

``You're going to need central bank buying to support gold prices significantly over $350, and at this point I think the chances of that are low,'' McConvey said.


GratefulForGold (11/09/02; 02:51:23MT - usagold.com msg#: 89129)
I don't know?
As always, I hesitate to post (after my initial "first blush" of enthusiasm) my uneducated and somewhat naive thoughts on this "august forum," but sometimes I'm emboldened by some inner drive (or is it the wine?). Thank those of you who must cringe at reading (if you do) my grade school level of understanding and tolerating my meager efforts. I've put forth more effort this past year to educate myself (thanks to discovering PMs, which led me to economics, which led me to politics, etc.) than I have in my entire life and I am SO grateful for the guidance I have received.

One reason that I continue to post my sophomoric (not even that – kindergarden?) two cents is that there are probably many like me who are lurking that are new. While I don't want to disrupt this forum by opening it up to bombardment of off-the-wall posters (you've done admirably well in containing/maintaining the content and quality of the posts here) I do want to make those like me feel welcome and free to post, even if their posts seem inadequate to them!

So, that said, my current thoughts on the interest rate cut:

I perceive these factors: the cut accelerates the downturn in US$, which the administration, if it has any brains, wants. I may be projecting intelligence in their motive here – that's possible. A weaker US$ is necessary on many levels but the ramifications on the other side are also huge (which is why people have been saying that AGreenspan was between a rock and a hard place in going either direction).

I'm suspecting that, for reasons (or the ultimate outcome) I don't understand, the Fed reduced rates fully knowing (or wanting?) the US consumer to keep spending and going further in debt. Big ticket items are starting to slow – cars, houses (how much mortgage finance new debt is to actually BUY a house and how much is refi that takes cash out to spend elsewhere?). I suspect that most refi monies received in the last month or two were not even spent to REDUCE credit card debt but rather were spent continuing to live (probably in life styles that need to disappear but people don't make those changes willingly). Hopefully some of that refi money has been spent on necessities like stockpiling food rather than a fancy restaurant tab.

I don't know why I keep going back to the consumer in this scenario – but one thing I read long ago (relatively) keeps ringing true in my ears: (paraphrasing) The US administration keeps taking action in relation to its constituency (the US public) and fails to act as the WORLD’S RESERVE CURRENCY. (Was that FOA??) Is this still happening? I know no other country is in the difficult position to having to economically please both its home base and the world, but maybe that is one advantage the Euro will have over the US$: The Euro is a combination of countries with a different type of "constituency" and can take a broader view and stance. The US, and our pathetic political system that has the politicians prostituting themselves to big business, media, telling the people what they want to hear in order to get elected or re-elected – the US acts as though its main obligation is to the US citizenry (which it is and should be in many ways). But, when it boils down to the US$ and economics, and that the US$ is the global, reserve currency of the entire world...I think the US government should broaden its scope, be unpopular with the US public and try to educate them to some of the "realities" of life (which is going to happen anyway...but that kind of change is always better accepted when it is done willingly rather than forced upon one). I don't know if it was the US who actually set out to become the world's reserve currency (or some "master planning") but it IS, and the US has failed for decades to act accordingly. It just keeps pleasing the US constituency and providing them with the riches of the world at discount.

Our government hasn't even given us a chance to grow because they don't trust our intelligence (we're only "fodder units," mind you) to be able to accept the truth of the global situation and deal with it. Instead, they keep "playing" us and we keep pretending to believe it and the game goes on until harsh reality slaps us in the face. Or, more correctly, deals us a lethal blow. Which it will, probably very soon.

OK – I accept that no politician speaks the truth. They can't, and get elected (which probably says more about not getting the vested-interest backing and financing in order to get elected, rather than a constituency that rejects hearing the truth and accepting it). So, where do we go from here? Our president is only a politician that made it to the Big Game. And, in my limited understanding of our current one, he hasn't too many original thoughts so he relies heavily on his closest advisors (and he is very intolerant of dissent...to the extent of having small town newspaper personnel fired for unflattering or opposing opinions). That's where I begin to shudder. I think he's ignorant of practically everything except "telling them what they want to hear, in a good ole’ boy fashion". If he has intelligence, I firmly believe it's all directed to cronyism (his "advisors") and furthering his father's and grandfather's (Prescott Bush, who made his fortune dealing in arms during WWII) (and probably those before them but I haven't studied the Bush family tree) instruction. In my book, the man's main talent is how to con the people and sell whatever is his latest product (which, unfortunately for us, is the fate of the US). I've seen enough to believe that those Saturday Night Live parodies were based on fact, not just an easy laugh. We have a driven man, with a script that many want to hear (after all, scare the American public by having some "war devastation" actually occur IN THE US, ON OUR SOIL, and we're ready to bomb the hell out of the rest of the world to get the SOB who has the audacity to do that to such a peace loving country who much of the world (muslim) resents because we love "peace and freedom.") (BTW, I am SO sick of hearing how they resent our "freedom" and that's why they hate us!) At the same time as the public is roused to go after those terrorists, the administration manages to sneak in a few freedom curtailing new laws or Executive Orders (Homeland Security), it allows a few of its energy buds to get a few new contracts, get its federal judges appointed and approved, etc. Give me a break -- if anyone thinks the current administration gives a rat's about the American public, they are in for a very rude awakening!

War is a GREAT diversion (it hides a multitide of "sins" (or what they don't want you to look at)). Until it finaly HITS HOME.

I'm sorry for this tirade. BUT, if we Americans want to survive, we need to start thinking outside of what WE WANT. We have been so spoiled for so long that we actually believe (because we want to) our own (politicians') hype!

GET GOLD (AND SILVER FOR EVERY DAY PRACTICALITY) NOW! Ignore the hype. Don't buy the BS. Protect yourself...do you think they will??

OK, Tacitus, you know where I stand in my political beliefs! Unfortunately, I know of no Democrat politician that I think any more highly of, so I can't argue "politics." I am not in favor of the "democratic - socialist" programs of free lunches. Nor am I in favor or policies that favor the upper 1% of the public ("cronies") which seems to be the current administration's bent. Unless, of course, our PM holdings should ever catapult US into that category! Ha! Ho!.

Sorry for my rambling...that seems to be who I am!


Belgian (11/9/02; 02:44:06MT - usagold.com msg#: 89128)
@ Sierra Madre (GS-closing Gold analysis dep.)
What if...It is realized that it is the CENTRAL BANKS (ECB/BIS-?) who are setting the price of Gold !? And that the private Gold-market has lost any <significant> grip on POG .

Official Goldreserves in the midst of the greatest currency transition ever ($ > €) ?

Would you remain into a market where you have no say or grip on prices ?

And wasn't it the WA (CBs) that caused the most significant price-move ?

It were the CBs who caused POG to decline and it were CBs who stopped the decline ! It is CBs who set the interest rates and decide on the appropiate currency exchange rates.
It is the CB who manages the creation of confetti.

The financial brotherhood goes where the action can be organized by themselves with or without political collusion.

POG is NOT moving in compensation for changing exchange rates...but, POG is moved to alter the exchange rates !!!
An enormous difference. The euro/Gold-concept/architecture !? That's how I see POG's behavior translated. Scarcely available Gold is "centrally", managed, price-wise instead of volume-wise.

POG is a tool to the ECB to set the €/$ exchange rate. People must keep on believing that the US$ is still the axis, around wich, POG is turning (compensating for $ decline). The offer/demand force for Gold the metal has been neutralized by official Goldreserves.
Gold will be rehabilitated as the monetary asset par excellence, without disturbing influences of the metal/paper boys ! What else than eliminate these "boys", could be the purpose of the "so called" CB Gold-sales/reshufflements !?

And "WHY" do you think so very little of substance has been said on those Gold-sales ? Yeah, right...nothing seems what it is, does it ?

If only the tiniest of fractions of these gigantic dollar oceans should dare to go for physical Gold...CBs would lose control over their ultimate tool > TOO SOON AND NOT AT THE APPROPIATE MOMENT !!! Keep the Gold *window* and (front)*door* closed for the masses. The Giants are cueing up at the backdoor of the CB-house.


Black Blade (11/9/02; 02:13:54MT - usagold.com msg#: 89127)
Costs hit home for energy crisis - Californians have to pay billions more to bail out utilities
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/a/2002/11/08/MN192456.DTL&type=printable

Snippit:

In a pair of decisions Thursday, state regulators voted to shift as much as $6 billion in costs onto consumers over the next year to help pay for the continued fallout from California's energy crisis. The resulting cost to the average customer of California's two biggest utilities -- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. and Southern California Edison -- will be at least $270 in 2003, according to estimates Thursday. Californians already pay extra on their bills because of surcharges imposed during the state's energy crisis in 2001. The extra charges -- totaling $22.50 per month for the average household -- were to have been eliminated when they were no longer necessary. Now, as a result of Thursday's rulings, consumers will continue to pay them for the foreseeable future. Commissioner Carl Wood explained in an interview, the commission has come to believe that the only way to solve California's energy crisis is to have ratepayers bear the burden.


Black Blade: As I said long ago, the blunders made by the state's re-regulation scheme will be passed on to the taxpayer. The state continues to suffer worse than most with higher unemployment, higher taxes, and a weaker economy. Every postwar recession has been preceded by an energy crisis.



Belgian (11/9/02; 01:41:08MT - usagold.com msg#: 89126)
EXACTLY !!! Dearest Aristotle : # 89100
THE WORLD HAS BEEN CRIPPLED UNDER ITS OWN DOLLARS...w're all in the same boat !!!

Voila, as simple and straithforward as that !

We are honouring each other with pieces of paper that only increase in "debt" un-value. If only I could find a way to "picture" this swelling dollar-debt-berg for all to see and understand. At home, I do this with the monopoly game, but the players enjoy it time and time again. They dislike it when paper is taken away and the remaining confetti increases in value. It is definitely a contra-natural act.

And at the end it is GOLD and GOLD alone that can restore/restaurate this distructive appetite, of all men, for more and more of the same worthless confetti illusion.

Confiscation of the vast oil reserves of Iraq by the "dollar", will give it (the $) some little, temporary, credibility ...again. Confetti, representing something ad repetitum. Only to add some more, again. Permanent Depreciation is the one and only direction and method/system to expand for the modern homo economicus.

And it is not only the price of Gold that is capped. Many other tricks are common practice to hide and avoid the massive price-hyperinflation, that already should have been with us. How brilliant we are !?

What you discribe in #89100, Ari, is the main reason *WHY* the euro not yet recognized as an "alternatif". Each time the financial media touch on the euro subject, I notice some hostile/envious, undertone. Evidence for admitting w're all in that same sinking dollar boat and postpone the launch of rescue boat. The Golden alarm (with many others) have simply been switched off, because of the fearful noise they would produce.

Many thanks Ari for contributing permanently to mine/our deeper understanding of it all. Thank you Sir !



Black Blade (11/9/02; 01:39:31MT - usagold.com msg#: 89125)
US drilling activity falls to 26-week low
http://ogj.pennnet.com/articles/web_article_display.cfm?ARTICLE_CATEGORY=DriPr&ARTICLE_ID=161065

Snippit:

HOUSTON, Nov. 8 -- US drilling activity this week dropped to the lowest level in 26 weeks with 826 rotary rigs working, down 28 from the previous week and well below the 1,010 units that were drilling during the same period a year ago, Baker Hughes Inc. officials reported Friday. Losses were reported in every major category. The number of US land rigs working dropped by 22 to 696 during the week. Offshore drilling was down 4 rigs to108 in the Gulf of Mexico and down by 5 to 110 rigs still working in US waters as a whole. Activity in inland waters dropped by 1 rig to 20. At least some of the loss likely was weather-related. Texas, where more than a week of rain flooded portions of the state, lost 15 rigs with 330 still working. Snow-blown Wyoming was down 6 rigs to 37. Louisiana, which caught some of the aftermath of rainstorms that blew through Texas, had 164 rigs working, 4 fewer than the previous week. Alaska's rig count was down 3 units to 7.


Black Blade: This too will impact energy supply. Drilling season is over and that means less new supply coming into the system and storage while decline rates accelerate. And just as we go into winter. Higher energy costs will kill any hope of an "economic recovery".



Black Blade (11/9/02; 01:28:44MT - usagold.com msg#: 89124)
Falling futures prices ignore market fundamentals
http://ogj.pennnet.com/articles/web_article_display.cfm?ARTICLE_CATEGORY=GenIn&ARTICLE_ID=160984

Snippit:

HOUSTON, Nov. 8 -- Energy futures prices continued to deteriorate Thursday in anticipation of the United Nations Security Council's approval Friday of a resolution stipulating no military action can be taken against Iraq without first consulting the UN. Market perceptions of increased cheating on production quotas among members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries have coupled with reduced apprehension of any immediate threat of war in the Middle East to drive down oil futures prices in recent weeks. "Oil is being moved out of the (Persian) Gulf to fill up producer-held storage closer to market. We suspect that much of OPEC's apparent increase is not actually making its way to refiners. Some is, as oil is also being moved to Asian refiners who have a certain sense of panic that their inventories are too low for normal times, let alone for a period of Middle East uncertainty."

However, Horsnell said, "US heating oil inventories have now passed beyond critical into dangerously low. They are too low for a normal US winter, let alone the lower-than-normal temperatures of late. There will be serious price spikes unless the weather warms up significantly and inventories increase very sharply." US oil inventories have increased recently, with refinery runs still depressed as the result of extended storms along the US Gulf Coast where those facilities are concentrated. However, oil stocks "are still 16.5 million bbl below normal levels, and the extent of the recent increase still fall short of what we would have expected given the refinery slow down," Horsnell said. "The oil market has then not slipped from tight to slack," he said. "If the supposed tide of OPEC oil fails to improve things quickly, then the fundamentals might cause a panic just as the geopolitics start to heat up and just as the speculative short-selling runs out of steam."

The December natural gas contract declined 2.3˘ to $3.83/Mcf Thursday on NYMEX, despite a report by the US Energy Information Administration of the early withdrawal last week of 27 bcf of gas from underground storage. "Year-over-year natural gas storage comparisons should now become increasingly supportive of prices," said Robert Morris, energy market analyst with Salomon Smith Barney Inc., New York. "After eliminating what was a more than 760 bcf year-over-year surplus at the beginning of April, storage levels are now below last year's levels heading into the winter." Moreover, he said, "Despite our assessment that industrial demand is still lagging 1 year ago by around 1.5 bcfd or more, North American natural gas production is projected to continue to decline. Consequently, with just normal temperatures in November and December, we project US storage could end this year at a year-over-year deficit of nearly 500 bcf."


Black Blade: It looks like we are being set up for another "energy crisis". One thing that the power industry has recently found out is that there are so few "dual-fuel" facilities left in operation that a short fall in either oil or gas for power generation will has a serious impact on power supply (can anyone hear say "California Energy Crisis"). Also, it should be noted that there have been a couple of hundred new NatGas fired power plants put online over the last couple of years, so the NG inventory in storage is actually quite small even though it is greater than the 5 year average. Also drawdowns are already occurring ahead of the "normal" winter heating season. A normal or colder than average winter will be a disaster. It just might be a long cold winter.



Sierra Madre (11/9/02; 01:05:15MT - usagold.com msg#: 89123)
Goldman Sachs closing its gold analysis department?

This is very strange and portends something big brewing, in my humble opinion. "Something wicked this way comes."

Rather reminds me of a Power closing its embassy, recalling the ambassador and repatriating its citizens.

In due course we shall understand the reasons for this extraordinary measure.

Sierra


Black Blade (11/9/02; 00:57:41MT - usagold.com msg#: 89122)
Why are credit card rates so high?
http://money.cnn.com/2002/09/24/pf/banking/q_rates/index.htm

Low rates are everywhere except on your credit card. Here's why.

Snippit:

The average interest rate on credit cards has fallen about 2 percentage points since the Fed started its rate-slashing campaign in 2001. But, let's face it, the current average of 14.74 percent hardly screams "Free money!" And credit card rates are actually beginning to creep up again, said Robert McKinley, CEO of credit-card tracker CardWeb.com. "The trend this year has been to raise rates because of the increasing number of defaults among consumers," McKinley said. Defaults, in this instance, include not just personal bankruptcy, but also late payments and going over one's credit limit.


Black Blade: It's called "Loan Sharking".

As always, get out of debt and stay out of debt, stash enough emergency cash for several months' expenses, accumulate Gold and Silver portfolio insurance, and start a storage program of nonperishable food and basic necessities. It's going to get ugly.


Sierra Madre (11/9/02; 00:50:13MT - usagold.com msg#: 89121)
The same old question: "Whither gold?"

Now we have the euro worth just a tiny bit more than the dollar. Interesting situation.

Let us suppose the dollar continues its trajectory downwards. And let us suppose that the price of gold continues to be hammered down every time it approaches $325 - which seems to be regarded as a kind of trigger point which cannot be allowed to establish itself, I guess because it heralds a breakaway up past $330 and beyond, into territory which cannot be easily beaten back, thus spelling disaster for the gold shorts.

That would mean that the price of gold in euros would have to be declining. Envision the euro, worth $1.05, $1.10, and $1.20 And envision gold remaining blocked at $320. That would mean, respectively, gold in euros at e304.76, e290, and e266.66.

Gold, already rather scarce from anecdotal evidence, is going to go DOWN this way, in Euroland? A lower price, will not stimulate further buying? Where will the supply come from?

At parity, gold is $320 and e320.

But, it seemeth to me, that things can go the other way, too. Let us suppose that gold remains at e320, while the dollar continues its decline.

Then, with gold stable at e320, the price in dollars, at $1.05/1 euro, will be $336; at $1.10/ 1 euro, it will be $352; at $1.20/ 1 euro, it will be $384.

What's it going to be, in the showdown dollar vs. euro?

Will Europeans take their cue from the dollar price? Why should they? I don't know the answer but intuitively, I feel that this parting of the ways will allow us to witness a new evaluation of gold, based on European valuations, not on the American bandleader's valuation, as has been the case for decades.

The ino.com graph for the dollar is not comforting for dollar prospects. Within a few months - say six - we may be at $1.10 dollars for 1 euro. Maybe sooner. Depends perhaps on the outcome of - what's that ridiculous name: "Enduring Freedom"?

Sierra





Black Blade (11/9/02; 00:45:32MT - usagold.com msg#: 89120)
The Fed's deflation dread
http://money.cnn.com/2002/11/07/news/economy/deflation/index.htm

This week's dramatic rate cut may have been made with an eye towards Japan.

Snippit:

NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - When the Federal Reserve slashed interest rates this week, the central bank's policy-makers confidently claimed that the economy would get moving again, eventually, but they also probably had a nervous eye on the 800-pound gorilla lurking in the corner -- deflation. The policy-makers said they made the bigger-than-expected cut because of recent signs of economic weakness, a "soft spot" in an otherwise upward growth trajectory. But without mentioning it, the Fed almost certainly had to have another worry, deflation, in mind, some analysts said. "The Federal Reserve is completely cognizant of deflationary tendencies in the system," said Van Hoisington, president and senior investment officer of Hoisington Investment Management. "We would not be surprised to see future aggressive policy moves by the Fed."

Black Blade: "Interesting Times" - That's quite a comparison table at the linked article.


"The United States is not Japan!!!" – Larry Kudlow



Aristotle (11/9/02; 00:37:42MT - usagold.com msg#: 89119)
Mr. Gresham, in my opinion...
...someone should take old sentimental Ed out behind the woodshed and spank the idiocy outta him.

The prosecution rests upon the evidence already presented before the court, Your Honor.

G. Gys. --- A.


Black Blade (11/9/02; 00:34:53MT - usagold.com msg#: 89118)
Home bankruptcies jump 8 percent
http://www.msnbc.com/news/831322.asp

Connection between huge mortgages, personal bankruptcies

Snippit:

Consumer bankruptcy filings of all kinds are at record levels, but Chapter 13 filings — the category that attracts most homeowners — are outpacing other consumer categories. They were up 8 percent in the second quarter from a year earlier, compared with a less than 3 percent increase in personal bankruptcies overall and a slight decline in the more-popular Chapter 7, according to the American Bankruptcy Institute, a nonprofit group in Alexandria, Va. That rise comes as the total amount of mortgage debt outstanding has jumped 50 percent to almost $5.7 trillion in just the past four years. And bankruptcy experts say that is no coincidence.

Elizabeth Warren, a Harvard Law School professor who specializes in consumer bankruptcy, says there is a direct connection between the massive levels of mortgage-related debt that homeowners have taken on and the rise in personal bankruptcies. Her latest research indicates that the number of homeowners in bankruptcy protection has risen "sharply" in the past year to a record 750,000, compared with about 450,000 five years ago. "I think we're only seeing the front end of this wave," she says.

A portion of today's huge mortgage debt is attributable to people who took out large first mortgages amid the recent low-interest-rate environment in order to buy ever-larger and more expensive homes. But a good chunk represents people who are juggling debts and who took advantage of today's easy refinancing and home-equity-loan opportunities to extract more cash from their house. "Homeowners are putting their most valued asset on the line trying to right themselves," says Prof. Warren. "They are playing with fire." Prof. Warren has been a critic of the proposed bankruptcy bill that is designed to make it harder for debtors to file Chapter 7 and force more of them into Chapter 13. The bill failed to pass during the last session of Congress. Congress.


Black Blade: Like we didn't see this coming. Of course I have no sympathy for these people. To put their homes at risk is purely irresponsible behavior. Credit card debt is rising at a very furious clip. Now if the proposed bankruptcy legislation is passed – which is now very likely, these people will be forced to cough up. The credit bubble is about to collapse another house – a house of cards.



Black Blade (11/9/02; 00:18:52MT - usagold.com msg#: 89117)
With economy in doubt, much hangs on U.S. consumer
http://biz.yahoo.com/rf/021107/markets_stocks_consumer_1.html

Snippit:

NEW YORK, Nov 7 (Reuters) - With the Federal Reserve using one of its last shots to shore up the economy and business investment still looking dodgy, a lot is hanging on the U.S. consumer to keep the recovery going. While the Fed's move on Wednesday to cut interest rates should encourage businesses to boost capital spending, rates are unlikely to fall any lower on home loans, credit cards, or other consumer credit. Since consumer spending is the mainstay of the U.S. economy, a sharp decline could spell problems to the economy and put a damper on the stock market. "The consumer has to continue to spend," said Clare W. Zempel, chief investment strategist for Robert W. Baird & Co. "Provided that the consumer doesn't collapse, we can get sustained moderate economic growth, perhaps even tilted to the above moderate side -- the consumer just has to continue to spend and have a positive attitude." Investors are concerned that rising unemployment will prompt a cutback in spending, and that other consumers may be close to exhaustion. Without that impetus to fuel corporate profits, the stock market could be a victim. Cracks already have appeared with U.S. auto sales falling for a second straight month in October to their lowest level in four years. Without auto sales, housing remains the last thriving sector in an otherwise sputtering economy.


Black Blade: Quite the dilemma – pass on the rate cut to the consumer to keep the poor sucker spending and hurt banksters bottom line, or do nothing hoping against hope that the consumer keeps spending while borrowing at the same rate while the banksters pocket the difference. Nahhh, the consumer is about tapped out and can't keep it up. Those who needed new autos already got them and if the banksters won't cut rates then the consumer won't refi their homes to keep spending. In fact home sales are supposedly weakening. It looks like the game is about over. Besides the consumer can see that his friends, family, coworkers and neighbors are getting "pink slips". So he is not likely to rush out and buy another house or take on a lot more debt. It might even be a stretch to believe that the consumer will spend nearly as much this year on holiday spending, so we are now hearing about earnings warnings and declining earnings at retailers and discounters. We are in the "end game".



Black Blade (11/09/02; 00:03:05MT - usagold.com msg#: 89116)
Wall Street Sees Chance To Put Off Reforms
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25443-2002Nov7.html
Pitt's Departure, GOP Win Prompt Go-Slow Sentiment

Snippit:

BOCA RATON, Fla., Nov. 7 -- Harvey L. Pitt's resignation from the Securities and Exchange Commission, coupled with the Republican Party's success in the midterm elections, has emboldened some Wall Street executives to stiffen their resistance to strong reforms that only days ago seemed almost certain, industry and regulatory sources say.

Black Blade: It does not surprise me one bit. I think if Dubya has a sense of humor he could offer the job to Ralph Nader. Now that would get their attention. Hmmm…





ViewYesterday's Discussion.


Permission to reprint is hereby granted where the USAGOLD name is cited along with our web address, mailing address and phone number. For electronic reproductions, citing the post heading and the http://www.usagold.com/cpmforum/ website address as the source is sufficient.

usagold logo
P.O. Box 460009
Denver, Colorado 80246-0009

1-800-869-5115 (US)
00-800-8720-8720 (EU)

303-399-6759 (Fax)

admin@usagold.com


Office Hours
6:00am - 5:00pm
(U.S. Mountain Time)
Monday - Friday

American Numismatic Association
Member since 1975

Industry Council for Tangible Assets

USAGOLD Centennial Precious Metals is a BBB Accredited Business. Click for the BBB Business Review of this Gold, Silver & Platinum Dealers in Denver CO

Zero Complaints

 

Thursday May 24
website support: sitemaster@usagold.com
Site Map - Privacy- Disclaimer
The USAGOLD logo and stylized gold coin pile are trademarks of Michael J. Kosares.
© 1997-2012 Michael J. Kosares / USAGOLD All Rights Reserved