ARCHIVED DISCUSSION FROM 8/8/2005
All times are U.S. Mountain Time
(Yesterday's Discussion.)
Goldendome
(08/08/05; 23:53:09MT - usagold.com msg#: 134759)
Sirs Goldi & Ned
Goldilox: Isn't it interesting how the inflation or hyperinflation arguments clash with the deflationist views? Yet they both travel the same direction--toward disaster, along what may be parallel paths within sight of one another.
As J. Puplava has stated many times on his Financial Sense Newshour, he feels that we will suffer both inflation in required items (food, energy, health care, etc.) and deflation in leveraged financial items (real estate, bonds, stocks, etc.) both at the same time!
The question has been asked: How can you have deflation with $60 dollar oil? Why not with $100 oil? I think we can see that this could happen. The price of oil affects the pricing or profitability of a highly leveraged entity, group, or risk exposure, causing a large "hole" to appear where once was perceived a great fiat currency valuation---that is a deflation!
And should it spread, affect other markets and participants...well, who can say how many financial dominos could be threatened and fall. I have come to think that a deflationary "event" could cause a great knee-jerk movement into the monetary metals, faster than an inflation. So, yes, I think Puplava may be largely correct in his assertions that high rates of inflation and deflation may be able to exist together.
I was going to post a link for Ned, to a June 18th interview by Puplava with Robert Prechter at the Financial Sense Newshour, but my computer is acting up, not wanting to show URL's and I may need the assistance of second offspring to correct the mal-function. You know how that can be with we older technophobes. I listened to that interview again yesterday. Thought it good; it's little wonder that they agree on many and most things. Just how things progress and develop is a friendly point of controversy. So, Ned, if your interested, go to the "Ask the Experts" then click the 2005 Experts and look for the date 6-18-05 with Prechter. You can either listen or get a written transcript of the interview.
Have a great evening. Gdome
Goldilox
(08/08/05; 22:50:46MT - usagold.com msg#: 134758)
Simmons
@ Goldendome,
I especially liked the irony in his globalization remarks.
Increased localization being empowered by stifling fuel costs.
Who says market self-balancing principles are dead?
If this somes about, obviously, some new energy algorithms are gonna be needed.
Goldendome
(08/08/05; 22:33:05MT - usagold.com msg#: 134757)
World economy may well decline.
Sir Mas: Remove 25% of world consumption and we will certainly have a different economy; not necessarily for the better prosperity of all. But your points are well taken and may happen in the natural course of events.
Matt Simmons made a point in the interview, that I don't think has been presented here yet.
It is, that the developed nations, in particular, have deluded themselves forever about the perpetual supply of cheap fossil fuels. They have developed cities, mass infrastructure, and business and industry that will now, in the near future, be unsustainable, as fossil fuels inexorably increase in price. By not insisting earlier on, that real prices be higher--by forcing production ever higher--developed nations have built their economies on false cost structures that may shortly lead to disaster.
He further opined that the Globalization of trade is coming at precisely the wrong time. His view, that soon companies aren't going to be able to afford to outsource world wide for every facet of their production components. Localization will be coming back into vogue.
Goldilox
(08/08/05; 21:37:41MT - usagold.com msg#: 134756)
Ilusions
@ Flaccus,
Interesting that use the word "illusion" in this "Made for TV" world situation.
Don't know how much time you've spent in third world countries, but I found just getting off the plane quite an experience. The mass migrations from "poor" agrarian lifestyles have filled the city streets with hungry beggers in most major cities. At least as poor farmers they had a chance to feed themselves.
I guess the bottom line is whether we really want to "build self-sufficiency" or just make everyone "beholding" to the IMF/WB model.
The IMF history (well documented) as been to "advance" huge sums to friendly junta governments - the lion's share of which is used for "police weapons" to protect the generalissimo's power. Little of it actually goes to "development". Once the locals realise thay have been hood-winked by those in power, the junta is overthrown and flees, leaving behind huge debts to the banks that propped up the generalissimo in the first place. The "renegotiations" of that debt includes "privatization" of their resources (selling them to foreign interests) so the process can begin anew.
NAFTA and CAFTA hold great promise to reduce the US work force to similar conditions of debt burden as soon as foreign interests decide to stop funding the "consumer miracle". ARMs have reached 40% of new home mortgages, setting new home buyers up for a serious ravaging of their last vestige of "savings".
The bottom line is that the 20th Century, aside from being the bloodiest in human history, with over 100M deaths by human hands, in addition to some of the most deadly famines in history, has actually aided the transfer of more assets to the smallest percentage of individuals in history.
While those of us with some open eyes on this forum struggle to obtain what we hope to sustain us in later years in a "safer" form of savings, our taxation resources, originally earmarked for domestic services, are being redistibuted to the collaborators of world-wide resource plunder. How much of our SSI contributions have funded the oil admin's resource wars?
Now that admin wants to give the SSI proceeds to the same brokers who destroyed our 401k's with their ENRON facade and "Y2K bubble. I get no sense of financial security from that plan.
I recommend you find a copy of "Confessions of an Economic Hitman" for further documentation.
mas
(08/08/05; 21:05:09MT - usagold.com msg#: 134755)
Flaccus
Remove 25% consumption from the world today and what do we have? Lower oil prices? Better economies? Stability? No war in Iraq, thats for sure. No reserve currency? Pollution, no melting Greenland Ice lake. What else?
Take your pick. I may have it wrong, but that's the way I see it. We need better conservation methods, and that all points towards lower consumption. Or maybe we are reading this all wrong, could it be that the oil price isn't going up but the dollar is going down?
We wait and watch. Fed should have dropped the gold price yesterday by at least 10 USD's, will they be able to do it tonight? Be interesting if the gold price went up, that would really start to raise some questions about what is really going on with interest rate rises. (Junk bonds comes to mind).
Flaccus
(08/08/05; 20:52:58MT - usagold.com msg#: 134754)
Goldilox
I would argue the opposite. American consumption elevates the world's workers, moreso than Marxist dogma could have dreamed. For every skyscraper built there are thousands in Africa fed. As for the debt, how much of this economy is an illusion; how much reality? Would you rather live in a prosperous illusion or a poverty stricken reality? Now there's a question the philosophers hanging on the periphery of this table might take pains to address.
R Powell
(08/08/05; 20:16:31MT - usagold.com msg#: 134753)
BB
Thanks for the link..!
R Powell
(08/08/05; 20:12:45MT - usagold.com msg#: 134752)
Basic silver fundamentals
http://www.silverinstitute.org/wssum05.pdf
I've always been a believer that over the long, looong term, the law of supply and demand would set prices or, at least, highly influence them. In extreme situations, higher prices should be necessary to curb demand or channel smaller supplies to those who need that supply the most. Conversely, lower prices (sometimes below production costs) should discourage production when that production becomes too excessive. Coffee prices from about 2000 until mid-late 2004 are an example of a commodity priced below the cost of production. But the longer I study economics, the more convinced I become that I know very little.
But I'll post this link for what it's worth + for whoever is interested. The sources are suspect, as usual, but there isn't much of an alternative for number crunchers like myself. Anybody got any others..???
rich
Goldilox
(08/08/05; 19:31:15MT - usagold.com msg#: 134751)
Less oil consumption
@ Flaccus,
Fewer skyscrapers and less debt, perhaps?
One thing the economic boom of the Strong Dollar Reserve has enabled is the transfer of more wealth to billionaires and the nearly constant lowering of living conditions for most of the workers of the world (first world included).
With rebellion from the IMF/WB strangleholds growing in third world countries, we are now seeing a second wave of resource transfer in the NAFTA and CAFTA debacles, that also further erode US manufacturing strength.
The RE bubble exhibits some very concerning risks, as struggling US homeowners will likely find the banks owning their property and renting it back as in the 1930's.
Hedonistic BLS figures hide the unemployed behind their official epithets of "underutilized" and "not looking for work". Adding these numbers in from the footnotes of their own reports brings unemployment well into double digits - certainly not conducive to stability in an exploding RE market. Latest RE numbers show that upward of 50% of homebuyers are in the "speculative investment" market, not purchasing their own dwelling.
This debt balloon thingy will likely end badly!
Flaccus
(08/08/05; 19:20:21MT - usagold.com msg#: 134750)
mas
Sorry. Misunderstood your post on first reading. Point remains but not directed at you.
Goldilox
(08/08/05; 19:17:59MT - usagold.com msg#: 134749)
Daily Wrapup - Rob Kirby
http://www.financialsense.com/Market/wrapup.htm
snip:
I have gone on enough about oil, but did so because in many regards, I feel the oil story parallels the same type of unsustainable structure we are currently facing in the world's fiat money regime. Too much un-backed money and credit is being produced for currency to maintain its value. Amazingly, there has been no credible audit of the U.S. sovereign gold reserve alleged to be largely stored at Fort Knox, West Point and the Denver Mint – for 50 years, coincidence ehh? The bulk of mainstream economists and media ‘have always assumed’ the Wizard – Easy Al Greenspan has everything under control and the Federal Reserve is really an inflation fighting do good organization. Great efforts are made on the part of officialdom to marginalize folks who challenge these long held views. Gold bugs contend that officialdom is selling gold - rigging its price to perpetuate an unsustainable fiat money system that is doomed to fail and obscuring their actions through obfuscation including everything from creative accounting to fudging numbers to outright lies and deceit. The claims from officialdom center on their proclamations that ‘they too have done the numbers and everything looks fine’ – with official reports of a strong economy, low unemployment and low levels of inflation. If the bugs are correct, officialdom has done the number alright, and the Achilles heel in the illicit rigging game is officialdom's bleeding stocks of physical metal required to perpetuate the game. If history is a guide and the fiat game plays out in the same manner as the oil game, officialdom will sweep the gold cupboard bare – right to the last bar – before they say uncle. If this is really what is happening, by the time the game is over, the price of gold will categorically go up geometrically. Count on it.
-Goldilox
After a powerful commentary about Simmons weekend interview, Kirby compares the state of oil analysis with that on the financial front.
Flaccus
(08/08/05; 19:12:55MT - usagold.com msg#: 134748)
mas
Americans are expected to beat their breasts about that sort of thing in this politically correct world. But let me put it this way:
What if the United States did not consume 25% of the daily oil production? Where would the rest of the world be economically?
mas
(08/08/05; 19:06:52MT - usagold.com msg#: 134747)
Bush sign's massive energy bill into law
http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/050808/bush.html?.v=7
Out of the whole article, I like this bit the best.
"The bill recognizes that America is the world's leader in technology, and that we've got to use technology to be the world's leader in energy conservation," Bush said.
BB, you just mentioned that the last refinery built was when, 1976? Guess getting into the refinery business for heavy crude processing would be a good idea.
Isn't 25% of all the oil is consumed by the USA every day?
Black Blade
(08/08/05; 17:57:53MT - usagold.com msg#: 134746)
re: R Powell
http://p100.ezboard.com/fpeakoilpetroleumandpreciousmetalsfrm1.showMessage?topicID=6.topic
I doubt that this is "the big one". Just a realization among many that we are near "peak production", have refinery constraints, "peaked" on light sweet crude capacity, have at the very least bumped up against "production capacity", and that to keep the treadmill steady we have to pay more to produce "higher cost" oil to meet global demand amid the surge in demand from the world's new manufacturing powerhouses - "Chindia".
Also, note that many producing regions have recently "peaked" - North Sea, Mexico's Cantarell Field, and even Saudi Arabia's Ghawar Field. No new discoveries of "Super Giant" fields have been made since Cantarell in 1976. You need to find several smaller "Giants" to make up for the decline of the easy to find and produce "Super Giants". So far that has not happened as we lose 5 barrels of oil for every 3 we find (a losing proposition).
- Black Blade (Dennis Erectus)
Gotta hit the dojo for a couple of hours (link)
R Powell
(08/08/05; 17:28:49MT - usagold.com msg#: 134745)
Black Blade
Welcome back. You have been AWOL too long.
Your opinions on the approach of peak oil have been known for years. What's your opinion of this current run-up? Is this current move based on real supply/demand fundamentals OR just a majority belief that peak oil has arrived (as in speculative in nature)? Or, is it political in nature?
Rephrased: is this the big one? Real bull markets sometimes don't like to let too many people on board and I doubt that anyone has the nerve to short energy right now. If this is so, is there a down side move ahead? Just wondering as usual.....?????
rich
melda laure
(08/08/05; 17:25:25MT - usagold.com msg#: 134744)
Here's a corker, POG/POO ratio of unity.
http://www.financialsense.com/Market/wrapup.htm
Well talk about your "unredeemable" the sweet little troglodyte behind the banking counter wouldn't cash my paycheck. She said I need a "driver's license". or something like that. I tried to tell here I'm a retired sailor (wink!) and I never took up animal husbandry....
It is increasingly hard to get green stamps. It is almost silly. SNIP:
"If world demand for oil grows to say, 86 – 88 million barrels per day this winter heating season [from its current 83 - 84] without a corresponding ramp in supply, Simmons reckons the price of crude could spiral up in the magnitude of 5 or 10 times"
And that, my duckies, is at a constant dollar index value. The retro rockets are primed and ready. Which will explode first? POG? POO? Comex AG? Well, it wont matter. Orcs love explosions, and once they start, they'll use up the lot. And they wont have Goldman Sachs to call the top at 800 dollars the barrel.
R Powell
(08/08/05; 17:11:58MT - usagold.com msg#: 134743)
Relative to what..?
http://www.mrci.com/qpnight.asp
I posted the MRCI night quotes link for anyone interested in watching the prices of crude, heating oil + unleaded climb. Crude is now over $64.00.
Every once in a while I see ALL the currencies down and it's then that I wonder what the relative values are relative to. They're all down now (site updates every few minutes) with gold up $0.10. I know it's just market noise but still I wonder (who'll stop the rain).
Black Blade
(08/08/05; 16:54:37MT - usagold.com msg#: 134742)
Matt Simmons - Twilight In The Desert
I have the book and am taking it slow to analize the material closely. It is very good and I see a real debate developing between Matt Simmons (Simmons and Co. Intl.) and Daniel Yergin (CERA - Cambridge Energy Research Associates). I tend to lean more toward Simmons on the "Peak oil" issue as he has researched the subject quite well. I think that Yergin is just a bit too trusting of Saudi claims despite the lack of "transparency". One thing is certain - that light sweet crude production has definitely "peaked".
Another book I have, but yet to read is "The End of Oil: On the Edge of a Perilous New World" by Paul Roberts, and a re-read of "The House of Nomura" by Albert Alletzhauser for fun.
- Black Blade
Topaz
(08/08/05; 16:50:21MT - usagold.com msg#: 134741)
Bond/Dollar
http://www.futuresource.com/charts/charts.jsp?s=TYXY&o=DX&a=D&z=610x300&d=LOW&b=LINE&st=
Icessant anti-Dollar jawboning over the last several weeks has "finally" resulted in slightly negative (soft DX-soft Yield) market action.
Not what I'd call convincing though!
Goldilox
(08/08/05; 16:34:22MT - usagold.com msg#: 134740)
Simmons interview
@ BB (aka Dennis Erectus) - there's a blast from the past!
Puplava interviewed Matt Simmons over the weekend for his final pre-sailing spot this summer.
Have you read "Twilight in the Desert" or listened to any of Simmons' talks?
I think I speak for the majority of posters in that we would highly regard your impressions of either or both.
-G
Black Blade
(08/08/05; 16:00:49MT - usagold.com msg#: 134739)
Licking Lips?
WTI Crude at $64 and NG at $8.75
The problem for Crude is that production is at capacity and light sweet crude has hit "peak oil" production. Also note that refinery capacity is extremely tight as we in the US have not built a new refinery since 1976. Most of those refineries handle light sweet crude. We have nice inventories (including the SPR) but it is all heavy and heavy sour crude. It takes more heavy oil to get the same yield of distillate and gasoline than from light sweet crude.
Competition for remaining global oil (and natgas, coal, uranium, etc.) supply is intense with China and India ("Chindia") entering the market as new industrial powerhouses. This along with emerging middle classes in the Third World demanding a piece of the good life (cars, computers, cell phones, household appliances, etc.). Just tell Chang and Raj they can't have the same comforts in life as we do in the west and see where that gets you.
Today the most cited reason for the rise in the price of oil is the closure of the US embassy and two consulates in Saudi Arabia on security threats. Add to this possible terrorism with the change in Saudi leadership (although not considered a problem for US-Saudi relations). Al Qaeda would love to drive a wedge between the two governments now as there is speculation what changes in that relationship may be down the road when the next generation of the House of Saud takes over as the old generation dies off.
NatGas is already a concern due to limited land access to Federally owned lands and limits on drilling permits. But more important this summer is a return to normal summer temperatures that have "natural gas peakers" firing up to generate electricity on increased power demand (mostly air conditioning). NatGas injections are low and Canada's storage levels have fallen fast (they contribute 15% of US winter heating demand). The housing boom has also been a concern in the industry because virtually all new housing is heated with natgas. Meanwhile siting for LNG offloading terminals has been been another problem with NIMBY and safety concerns.
On the bright side, energy investors have made good money and energy workers have been fully employed for the first time in many years. I have been quite busy with up to five drill rigs at a time and running along with a couple of other projects for clients. This is quite a change when I was out of work for over a year a couple of years back (essentially living off dividends and funds from operations from royalties). In the US we have not prepared for the inevitable oil crunch and that has been quite beneficial for those in natural resource investments. In the end it will help to crush the USD and it is imperative to have a bit of "Portfolio Insurance" in Gold and Silver.
As always, get out of debt and stay out of debt, stash enough emergency cash for several months household expenses, accumulate Gold and Silver "portfolio insurnace", and start a storage program of nonperishable food and basic goods.
Licking my lips? You betcha!!!
- Black Blade (aka Dennis Erectus)
TownCrier
(8/8/05; 15:07:19MT - usagold.com msg#: 134738)
Oil hits record on Saudi security threat
http://today.reuters.com/news/NewsArticle.aspx?type=businessNews&storyID=2005-08-08T193715Z_01_L08675543_RTRIDST_0_BUSINESS-MARKETS-OIL-DC.XML
LONDON (Reuters) - Oil prices hit a record high $64 Monday after warnings of militant attacks in the world's biggest oil exporter Saudi Arabia and on worries about refinery outages in the United States.
Concerns over the Saudi security situation coincided with news that another U.S. refinery had run into output problems, adding to pressure on gasoline supplies in the world's biggest consumer during peak summer demand.
News that OPEC's second largest producer Iran had resumed its nuclear work, despite European Union warnings of possible United Nations sanctions, further strained nerves.
In real terms, stripping out inflation, oil is still below the $80 a barrel on average for the year after the 1979 Iranian revolution.
But at an average of more than $53 for the year to date for U.S. crude, prices are well above those during the 1974 Arab oil embargo.
^----(from url)----^
Two things. Although oil ITSELF hasn't changed, there are more USES for a barrel of oil today than there was back then. On the other hand, the dollar, while still the same in name, is certainly not the same in spirit as it was back then.
And by extension of these thoughts, therein can be found the rationale in choosing gold (instead of dollars) as your form of savings. Anticipate the scenario where gold comes more fully into vogue through improved usage as a MTM reserve asset in place of the intellectually and morally bankrupted post-Bretton Woods system.
R.
USAGOLD Daily Market Report
(8/8/05; 14:28:21MT - usagold.com msg#: 134737)
Page Update!
http://www.usagold.com/DailyQuotes.html
The Daily Gold Market Report has been
updated.
If you are considering investments in gold we invite you to
request our free
introductory information packet detailing the products and services offered
by USAGOLD ~ Centennial Precious Metals. We welcome your inquiry and look
forward to working with you.
Monday Market Excerpts
August 8 (from Reuters) -- U.S. gold futures drifted to a softer close on Monday, hit by speculative liquidation as a strike by gold miners began as expected.
Summer volume in the market remained thin before a U.S. Federal Reserve decision on interest rates on Tuesday, dealers said.
At a U.S. Fed meeting on Tuesday, policymakers are seen delivering a tenth straight 25 basis-point increase in the benchmark funds rate, taking it to 3.5 percent.
Gold traders said the market also had priced such a rise.
COMEX December contracts slipped $2.50 to $440.30.
Meanwhile in South Africa, gold miners who are demanding higher wages stayed off work on Monday, bringing gold pits in the world's biggest bullion producer to a standstill.
The strike was the latest action in recent weeks in a nation plagued by huge income gaps between the rich and mostly black poor, more than a decade after apartheid's official end.
One lead negotiator representing gold producers estimated a daily loss of around 40,000 ounces and 130 million rand ($20.2 million) in lost revenue per day due to the strike.
"The strike was priced in and the fund buying from last week in gold and silver stopped -- that's why we came off on liquidation-type selling," said a desk trader in New York.
"It's range-trading now, and we'll wait to see what the dealers want to do," he added. "They might buy a little down here, but you don't know where the next big move is going to be."
---(see url for full news, 24-hr newswire, market quotes)---
Goldilox
(8/8/05; 13:51:48MT - usagold.com msg#: 134736)
Ag action
Silver is "clinging" to Seven bucks today!
TownCrier
(8/8/05; 13:50:58MT - usagold.com msg#: 134735)
Latest arrival from von Braun ---- Central Banks and 'Reserves'