gold coins and bullion
Centennial Precious Metals, Inc: Serving Gold Coin & Bullion Investors Since 1973
Open for business 6am to 6pm Mountain Time
(Home Page) (How to Buy Gold) (Gold Coin Images) (Daily Market Report) (Live Gold Price)
(First-time Buyers) (Gold Discussion) (ABCs of Gold Book) (Gold IRA) (Buy Gold Coins Online)
(European Clientele)

Online Information Packet
(About Us)

 

Welcome to the USAGOLD Gold Discussion Archives. Looking to buy gold coins and bullion? The archives of this gold discussion forum are a treasure trove of information to educate investors about protecting their wealth through portfolio diversification with private gold ownership. The discussion forum also covers the wider issues of the past, present, and future role of gold in international monetary policy and the dynamics of the modern gold markets. To join the debate request a discussion password here.

The opinions posted by all guests at this forum are expressly their own and do not necessarily represent the views of the management or staff of USAGOLD - Centennial Precious Metals. The hosting of this forum shall therefore not be construed as equivalent to endorsement by USAGOLD - Centennial Precious Metals of any of the opinions posted here.

 

FORUM ARCHIVES
Select date of the archive you wish to view

Month Day Year
Archives date back to September 22, 1998




WELCOME TO THE ARCHIVES!
(MAIN) (Post a New Message)

(Forum Archives - Hall of Fame)

(Gold Trail - Thoughts!)

(View Today's Discussion) (View Previous Day's Discussion) (View Next Day's Discussion)

ARCHIVED DISCUSSION FROM 1/5/2006
All times are U.S. Mountain Time

(Yesterday's Discussion.)

Knallgold (1/5/06; 23:51:47MT - usagold.com msg#: 140149)
@TC
The arrgh was not your fault as you found out-when I copied this line,I changed a little bit intentionally (and noted that in my comment afterwards),in the hope of being able to make a point subcutaneously.Hmm,not sure if I failed.

TownCrier (1/5/06; 23:27:14MT - usagold.com msg#: 140148)
Sundeck, thanks for the continuing contributions
Among the very finest.

(Usually it takes a contest to wrest such a gem from your desktop.)

If I ever owed you a compliment, it is now paid. Until the next time...

R.


Sundeck (1/5/06; 22:48:31MT - usagold.com msg#: 140147)
Personal IOUs, FRNs and Gold. Nothing new...just a reminder.
Supposing I met one of the knights or ladies from this round table and, after a bit of friendly banter, it was agreed that I should buy from them some item which we both valued.

It might be anything across the spectrum of human values, but we both agree that, whatever it be, it has value to each of us. Therefore the exchange involves an agreement within which I undertake to deliver to you (the knight or lady) something of comparable value as agreed between us.

I offer you four modes of settlement:

(1) an IOU written on a scrap of paper and signed by me,

(2) federal reserve notes totalling an agreed sum,

(3) a digital transfer to your bank account of agreed sum,

(4) pure gold of an agreed weight.


Which of these modes of settlement would you be most CONFIDENT in accepting?


(1) Personal IOU. Now, you don't know me from Adam.... and apart from my sparkling personality (capped by wit and an honest countenance) you have no way of knowing whether I would honour an IOU to be settled in the future. You, and most people, would consider this to be a very risky mode of settlement, but nonetheless one that may be chosen under certain circumstances. Still, nearly everyone would agree that this would be the riskiest of the four modes of settlement. One might say that your CONFIDENCE in the transaction would be low.

(2) Consider settlement with FRNs. If our chance encounter and our deal was conducted in the USA in present times, then most people would be comfortable accepting FRNs as settlement. Concerns that may arise include whether the notes were counterfeit; or that they may be the profits from the sale of stolen goods or illicit drug deals. There may be other concerns as well, but few people would worry (at least in present times) about the extra THIRD-PARTY RISK implicit in such a mode of settlement: that is, the risk of default by the backer of the notes - the Federal Treasury of the USA.

So trusted is this "legacy" arrangement, that I could offer you (a non-US National, say) US FRNs in many other countries (Costa Rica, Canada, Thailand, Mexico, Russia, to name several) and you may still be comfortable with the arrangement. Then, your additional concerns may include increased uncertainty about the authenticity of the notes, the inconvenience of being able to pass-on the notes in other personal transactions, or your ability to readily exchange them for local currency. Nonetheless, most people would consider this mode of settlement less risky than a simple paper IOU from me. Your CONFIDENCE would be higher than for a personal IOU, but in effect, whether you realised it or not, you would be accepting an IOU, not from unknown little-ol' me, but from the mighty Treasury of the USA. Not a difficult decision, you might think...

(3) Digital transfer. In this case, if you could witness the transfer and see that the balance of your account had altered accordingly, then you may be reasonably comfortable. You may have concerns about the authenticity of the details that you are viewing on the computer screen (from cyber-shysting of various kinds), but if you could overcome this, then your CONFIDENCE would be that which you have in your bank combined with that which you have in the US monetary system. In this case you are effectively refusing my paper IOU in prefernence for the IOU of the Federal Treasury as well as whatever guarantees are provided by your bank regarding digital transactions and accounts generally. Again, not a difficult decision, you might think...

(4) Gold in the hand. You would be rightly concerned that the "gold" I am giving you is pure and that the weight is correct. However, these are simple things to verify in this day and age...unlike hundreds of years ago. Upon my giving you the agreed weight, your CONFIDENCE would be that which you have in gold alone as a store of value. Perhaps there would still be concerns about theft or inadvertant loss (problems in common with FRNs or personal IOU), but there would be absolutely no second- or third-party risk associated with settlement. I could be eaten by a lion, your bank could fail, or the US Treasury could disappear into the sea and it would not affect the value of your transaction one iota.

...........................................

Notice how I have emphasised CONFIDENCE in the above text...because it is confidence above everything else that underpins settlement; be it in the form of personal IOUs, government IOUs (FRNs), digital transfers of "nominal" FRNs, or gold itself.

It is largely because of this CONFIDENCE problem (that had to be overcome) that gold became the preferred means of settlement between traders... especially for trade with foreign lands. No problem with that...easy to understand.

What about the IOUs (the "currencies") of one country or another? These are inherently risky. Not only may their value be pushed and pulled by the enormous FX flows that course around the globe, but their value may also be altered arbitrarily by the custodians of the currencies involved - the national treasuries of the governments concerned.

Governments always act with their own interests in mind, so when you accept an IOU from another country you knowingly or unknowingly accept all of their idiosyncrasies. If they are loose or wiley in issueing you their debt, then you bear the risks...just as you would if you were dealing with me and one of my IOUs. And if they happen to carry a very large stick and have demonstrated a willingness to use it then you can whistle for settlement...just as you would have to do with Sundeck if he packed a pair of pearl-handle six-shooters and was a crack shot.

Sooo...in fact, the IOUs of a nation may well be MORE RISKY than the simple IOUs of an unknown soul that you meet in a bar somewhere...and there may come a time (if it is not already here) where lowly Sundeck's IOU is held with greater confidence than the IOUs of the Federal Treasury of the USA.

Let me say that again..."There may come a time (if it is not already here) where lowly Sundeck's IOU is held with greater confidence than the IOUs of the Federal Treasury of the USA."

Nearly everyone would scoff at this, but it is true. Sundeck is unencumbered by debt, his honesty can be verified from numerous referees and he does not have a punitive arsenal with which to fend off, intimidate or destroy those coming to claim upon his IOUs. Sundeck's IOUs never overstate his worth and his credit is good. Unfortunately the same may no longer be said of the USA.

In truth, CONFIDENCE in the USA and its monetary system is eroding rapidly. It is being talked about more and more...not only behind the scenes, but in the mainstream media. Since most other monetary systems have been strongly coupled to the US dollar for fifty years or more, loss of confidence in the US dollar will likely infect these other "derivative" currencies. Indeed, the custodians of these other currencies may be unable to stand against the flow away from the US dollar - even if they wanted to...they may just have to go along with it. Under these circumstances it is tangible "things" (goods, sound businesses, commodities) - amongst which gold is pre-eminent - that will be sought by small and large players alike in exchange for the IOUs of all countries alike, but especially the IOUs of the USA.

Nothing new under the Sun here...

:-)

Sundeck





Goldilox (1/5/06; 22:48:17MT - usagold.com msg#: 140146)
News sequence
@ TC,

Ain't it the truth?

The Newshounds are nearly the last to know.


Goldendome (1/5/06; 22:41:42MT - usagold.com msg#: 140145)
More Middle Eastern intrigue

Yesterday, saw the Israeli PM afflicted with a severe stroke, leaving him gravely ill.

Last night and today saw about an $8 drop in the gold price and a leveling off of the dollar after a big fall. Coincidence? Probably. But with the U.S.'s hands full in Iraq, it's been rumored that Israel might be the designated Iran attacker. An attack, we are told, that would be prompted by nuclear activity -- in the headlines, and by the Euro-oil bourse, on the back page.

Now with Prime Minister Sharon down and Israeli politics in a state of uncertainty, could the gold market be dropping the odds on an attack taking place? I don't know -- but it's only about 9 weeks away to the opening of that market (early March, I believe.)

Some have opined that some of the gold run-up of late, may be attributed to nervousness over the Iranian issues now and in March. If an attack is less likely, I would expect continued weakness for the dollar going forward, and growing strength for the Euro as more demand is anticipated for that currency; and hopefully, steady to rising gold prices.


Flatliner (1/5/06; 20:44:30MT - usagold.com msg#: 140144)
@TownCrier and However…
"International trade with that country will falter" – ah, yeah… That's what I wrote. Did I really mean that? Now that you've pointed it out, I'm not sure.

At the time I wrote that, I was thinking about long term business decisions. In an environment where the currency is unstable, business can't plan for the future with as much confidence as they can in a stable environment. In a stable environment, you can borrow currency at a known fixed rate and spend it over time knowing that it will depreciate at some small constant rate over the life of the loan. Likewise, and probably more important, the creditor can lend currency at a rate above inflation knowing that they will make a little profit. In an unstable environment, any money that you borrow, may not have the purchasing power in a few months that you'd planned your business around thus, driving you out of business. Or, credit just dries up because no one is willing lend - long.

Businesses usually need investment capital to grow, stay current and get more efficient. In a society where stability can not be found with the currency means that businesses will suffer. If business suffers, it's going to be really hard to actually manufacture something to export.

Also, everyone on the outside looking in is going to think twice before investing in a business in that type of environment. The risks are just too great. Sure, they will look for things to buy, but they will not invest.

So, in a Fiat system where the value of the currency is determined by the economy of that county, those in charge of printing the currency will want to think twice about how they manage it. If they print little, their currency will be strong for business attracting investment capital for long term decision making and fundamental business support. If they print a lot, they will undermine the ability for business to function in any long term fashion.

It seems that when it comes to exports and imports, it might be a matter of – does anyone want what they produce? If building the hottest car on the market will improve exports, then the country will have to have a monetary policy that will attract big business investment. Then, in time, exports will happen. (maybe…)

I'm glad you called me on that tidbit and I'm sure you'll call me on something that I've written here. Keep in mind that I am a student, at heart, and look forward to broadening my understanding though this change in this great forum.

Oh, two more things. I'm looking forward to the day when traveling with a gold coin is the norm and the compliments that I've seen lately in this forum. It has lightened the mood a little.


TownCrier (1/5/06; 20:38:47MT - usagold.com msg#: 140143)
Goldi
First there is the conception of a goal.

Then there are stirrings in the shadows.

Then there is writing on the wall.

Then there are headlines.

Then there are newscasts.

Then you one day awake and marvel at how so much could have happened 'overnight'.

R.

PS. Flatliner, I liked your comments about TIME and the brew analogies that followed.


Goldilox (1/5/06; 19:39:14MT - usagold.com msg#: 140142)
China investment atmosphere
@TC,

Given how much China has invested in infrastructure, production, and resources in the last years, it's tough to tell if this release is a "continuation of a trend" or just an official announcement of something they've been doing for a while.

Huge purchases in Canadian and South American resource projects, large purchases of Boeing and John Deere equipment, and the offer for UnoCal are all indicative of them wanting to put some of those excess dollars to work. They may not be ready to stop propping up the US Treasury, but they sure aren't going to put all their eggs in that one basket.


TownCrier (1/5/06; 19:15:59MT - usagold.com msg#: 140141)
China relaxing grip on dollar
http://yahoo.reuters.com/financeQuoteCompanyNewsArticle.jhtml?duid=mtfh62561_2006-01-05_11-23-01_pek63223_newsml
BEIJING, Jan 5 (Reuters) - China's foreign exchange regulator said on Thursday it would abolish foreign exchange quota limits for outbound investment as one of its key tasks in 2006.

It also said it planned to explore new ways of using China's foreign exchange reserves and broadening their investment scope. Most of the country's foreign exchange reserves, which hit $769 billion by end-September, are invested in U.S. Treasuries.

"We will abolish foreign exchange quota limits for outbound investment to give more support to companies investing overseas," the State Administration of Foreign Exchange said.

The move will offer a boon to domestic firms as they seek to strike out onto the world stage and help the country to offset a rapid accumulation of foreign exchange reserves.

...also reiterated the government's goal of reducing China's balance of payments surplus, saying it aimed to promote a balanced international payments position.

^---(from url)---^

Take a moment and try to understand what this signifies that China is going to let its companies SPEND their earned dollars in the first place -- rather than having the People's Bank continue to ABSORB the dollars in exchange for renminbi.

Secondly, try to reconcile to your own satisfaction how the other two goals can work in harmony; one being that China wants to "broaden the investment scope" of its vast dollar-dominated foreign exchange reserves, and the other being that China wants to promote a "balanced international payments position".

Choosing gold (technically an import) is a NATURAL way to achieve a balancing of the books while at the same time sacrificing nothing with respect to the size and strength of their reserve position. In fact, with an eye to future performance of dollars vs. gold, with MTM gold they emerge all the stronger.

The transition to freegold... slowly happening right before your eyes, folks.

R.


USAGOLD Daily Market Report (1/5/06; 18:04:42MT - usagold.com msg#: 140140)
Page Update!
http://www.usagold.com/DailyQuotes.html
The Daily Gold Market Report has been updated.

If you are considering investments in gold we invite you to request our free introductory information packet detailing the products and services offered by USAGOLD ~ Centennial Precious Metals. We welcome your inquiry and look forward to working with you.

THURSDAY Market Excerpts

January 5 (from MarketWatch) -- Gold futures closed with a loss of over 1% Thursday after gaining more than $40 an ounce in the past eight sessions.

"Gold was overbought and the first quarter is a seasonally weak period for gold, so no surprise there's profit-taking," said Peter Grandich, editor of the Grandich Letter.

"But this powerful secular bull market in gold has a history of sharp but short corrections so any sustained weakness is not expected," he said.

The COMEX February contract has climbed $40.30 since its close at $495.30 on Dec. 21. On Wednesday, it traded at a three-week high on an intraday basis but closed at the highest level in almost 25 years.

The contract finished Thursday at $527.80, down $7.80 following a low of $524.

Indeed, "gold has [been] hit with a round of profit-taking as the dollar found some legs and crude is trading soft," said Charles Nedoss, an analyst at Peak Trading Group.

"Keep your seat belts buckled. It's going to a wild ride as volatility remains high," Nedoss warned.

---(see url for full news, 24-hr newswire, market quotes)---


silverton3 (1/5/06; 17:41:06MT - usagold.com msg#: 140139)
Increase Margins

Chicago Board of trade raised margins on Gold and Silver Futures.

-------------

The following margin changes are effective with the closing of business January 5, 2006.

I. Changes to Margins on CBOT Futures

From Initial/Maintenance/Hedge
To Initial/Maintenance/Hedge

100 Oz. Gold $1,418/$1,050/$1,050
$1,823/$1,350/$1,350

Mini-Sized Gold $473/$350/$350
$608/$450/$450

5000 Oz Silver $1,620/$1,200/$1,200 $1,823/$1,350/$1,350
Mini-Sized Silver $324/$240/$240 $365/$270/$270

In setting margins levels, the Chicago Board of Trade Margin Review Group along with the CME Clearing House monitors current and historical price movements covering short-term, intermediate and longer-term data using statistical and parametric and non-parametric analysis. Futures maintenance margin levels are typically set to cover at least the maximum one-day price move on 95% to 99% of the days during these time periods.


TownCrier (1/5/06; 17:02:09MT - usagold.com msg#: 140138)
Knallgold, that's odd...
Just now I was scrolling through the forum and ran across my original post... where I now see I hadn't actually misspoke. Turns out that your translated quote was out of kilter, and it was that translation that I subsequently responded to.

[The 'Copy&Paste' feature of the mouse is a very quick and handy tool to avoid that sort of thing.]

Regards,
R.


TownCrier (1/5/06; 16:42:43MT - usagold.com msg#: 140137)
Fed still buying more Treasuries outright
http://yahoo.reuters.com/financeQuoteCompanyNewsArticle.jhtml?duid=mtfh69935_2006-01-05_15-46-42_n05196240_newsml
Following yesterday's outright purchase (monetization) of $844 million of government debt, the Federal Reserve was at it again today. [see yesterday msg#: 140076]

Today, depsite a tame fed funds market, the trading desk of the Federal Reserve bought another $448 million, upping the 'permanent' money supply in the process. This time the focus was upon TIPS across the spectrum, taking maturities from January 2007 to April 2032.

In additional open market operations today the Fed added temporary money through $11 billion in two-week repurchase agreements, and a further $5.75 billion via overnight repos.

When you see how easily money is made, you question the wisdom of various parties (especially foreigners and CBs) who have for so long been willing to hold onto it as though it were a reserve asset of particular merit.

To be sure, there was a time for it, but that time is now passing. The international move is onward to gold.

R.


Goldilox (1/5/06; 15:43:00MT - usagold.com msg#: 140136)
Dad's Booze "conundrum"
Or maybe, being smarter than the average Dad, he moves the good stuff to the garage filed under "automotive lubricants", and lets the kids keep acquiring more and more diluted booty from their illicit enterprise. He might even add some color to the liquid in the bottle (a little flat cola will do) to make them think they are still getting real hootch!

Now there's a Dad that understands "market spin".







Whitewaterwoman (1/5/06; 13:48:55MT - usagold.com msg#: 140135)
Gold, please, Mr. Knife
...because unlike the Google company, I know gold's fundamentals and I like them very much. I'm not saying Google doesn't have good fundies, but I don't know them or their management.

What I love about physical gold is that I know the manager intimately: it's ME! And I have great trust in myself.

On a wonkish note, Google's value depends on people being online. If energy costs soar, or anything else causes rolling blackouts...no computers, except for laptops rechargable by solar or hand-crank.

Happy New Year, all!




TownCrier (1/5/06; 13:45:54MT - usagold.com msg#: 140134)
Knallgold, msg#: 140118
Arrrgh! (And by that I also mean, "Ooops!!")

"There's really not much we can do, personally, to control our monetary system or its controllers. But we CAN take control of our money, by making sure it is as secure as solid gold"--TC

I beg your many pardons for my confounding grammatical slip. I'm sure you'll have an easier time following my train of thought when I offer the corrected version below, which is what I MEANT to type.

"...But we CAN take control of our SAVINGS, by making sure it is as secure as solid gold"

R.


Liberty Head (1/5/06; 13:19:51MT - usagold.com msg#: 140133)
Dad's Moonshine

Dad's kids are more clever than Dad. They dilute the moonshine and finger the maid. They beat her up. Dad says with pride "That's my boys". Dad brings in more moonshine, finds another maid and the cycle repeats until the kids all drop dead with cirrhosis.
Anyone who tries to tell Dad the truth is accused of treason, anarchy and terrorism. If there is a trial at all, it will come after the sentence has been imposed.
Welcome to the USA.


Best Wishes


USAGOLD / Centennial Precious Metals, Inc. (1/5/06; 13:01:41MT - usagold.com msg#: 140132)
The art of converting your seasonal fruits into everlasting value!
http://www.usagold.com/gold-coins.html

Swiss gold francs

Harvest
Whatever it is that you may have sown,
we'll give you the power to reap GOLD.

1-800-869-5115
USAGOLD-Centennial has three decades of experience in the field



canamami (1/5/06; 12:51:37MT - usagold.com msg#: 140131)
Gold-backed currencies
One alternative is that allowed by US law: Insert gold clauses of some sort in private contracts.

The entire monetary system is not based on gold, so there is no need and little incentive for the government "to go off the gold standard", or to outlaw the gold clauses. However, private parties who agree to use gold clauses as part of their contracts can do so. This permits a private party to a long-term contract to look to a gold clause to protect their interests (long-term asset value protection), perhaps in the context of a long-term commercial lease. The flipside probably would be to allow one party to walk away from the arrangement, if the other party triggered the gold option in the contract.



Flatliner (1/5/06; 12:18:06MT - usagold.com msg#: 140130)
Moonshine? Maybe?
Ah… I see. I like how dad is deceived in this example. Very nice.

It would still do dad good to buy his liquor closer to the time that he wants to use it. That way, when the kids open the cabinet to rob him, there is nothing there to steal. The problem here is still time. The longer dad holds the bottle, the higher the probability that the kids will party at his expense.


Goldilox (1/5/06; 12:15:16MT - usagold.com msg#: 140129)
Liquor Cabinet
I yield to Silverton3's awesome analogy!


silverton3 (1/5/06; 11:47:37MT - usagold.com msg#: 140128)
Beer is the wrong example.
A currency is much more like a bottle of hard liquor that is in Dad's liquor cabinet.

The teenagers have a party, and drink half the liquor. Then they fill it up with water, so that anyone looking at it does not know it has been consumed.

Then there is another party, and the remainder is consumed. Still, the teenagers refill the bottle, which is now all water. But until dad checks the bottle, nothing happens.


Flatliner (1/5/06; 10:37:58MT - usagold.com msg#: 140127)
Homebrew?
I don't think *I* emptied enough bottles of beer to clearly see the analogy presented in a previous post.

Does the beer represent the ‘value’ where as the bottle represents the ‘currency’? If so, I have to ask, how did the beer disappear?

What is very interesting here is that in these discussions the element of time is quite often overlooked. How long does it take for a currency to be devalued? How long does it take before the failures in the system cause confidence in the system to be reduced? How long does it take to count to infinity?

Let's take counting to infinity as a starter. Here, let's consider counting from 1 to zero by always cutting the number in half. Thus, the sequence starts: 1, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, 0.0625, … Anyone that has explored this puzzle will find that there are an infinite number of entries between 1 and zero and, even though we may continue to try to solve the puzzle day in and day out, getting to the end is impossible and it will take an infinite amount of time. To speed up the process, if you can apply some calculus and determine that given that you've counted an infinite number of times, you will come to zero as your answer.

Calculus is great because it removes the element of time. Reality is a little different. We are stuck with time.

Now, let's look back to see what happened to that beer – over time. If, the owner of that beer drank it, well, they got to enjoy the full value of their beer. That would be like selling your car for 10k and turning around and buying new living room furniture. Very little time elapsed between the opening of the transaction and the completion of it. During that time, as with counting to infinity, only a few steps can be taken along the devaluing path and it may not even be perceived as having an affect during that time frame. But, what if the owner of the beer wanted to enjoy it over a long period of time? Well, here we've got problems. One problem is evaporation. Left in the bottle uncapped, evaporation is slow but rot steps in. Spread thin, evaporation comes into play. The amazing part here is that once the beer is opened, everyone knows that you either enjoy it *now* or it becomes worthless.

This same principles of rot and evaporation can be applied to currencies where time is the currency carry trade. Once you open a transaction thus acquiring currency, you have an open beer. If you use that currency right away, it trades at full value – it's a full beer. Everyone sees it as a full beer. Everyone will accept it as a full beer. But, if you hold that beer long, it will ether evaporate of rot. Thus, anyone that has studied beer knows that you don't buy beer and put it on the shelf in the garage with the intent of keeping it for a long period of time. It goes bad. Currencies are the same way. Either there is outright inflation (Evaporation of value) or the system of preservation is flawed allowing rot to consume it over time.

We could debate all day about which is worse – evaporation of value or rot in the system, but the reality is that it just goes bad over time. It's that simple. Don't buy and save beer. Buy it when you want it and use it before it before it goes bad. Keep the period of time where you're into your beer transaction at a minimum and find things that don't rot to use as your savings.


contrarian (1/5/06; 10:05:13MT - usagold.com msg#: 140126)
Gold Standard--Oil in Euros
http://www.raisethehammer.org/index.asp?id=133
Gold Standard--
please read link above for explanation of how important keeping oil traded for dollars is for maintaining dollar as international reserve currency.


Goldilox (1/5/06; 09:25:50MT - usagold.com msg#: 140125)
$6 limit
Watching the POG correction this morning brought up an interesting question. Are we seeing the $6 limit imposed on the downward side in this phase of the golden bull?

Goldilox (1/5/06; 09:20:47MT - usagold.com msg#: 140124)
The End of the Grid
snip:

[Huck Finn's Electricity Hut is regulated by the State. So Huck can only charge his customers a moderate fee for service. But one day, Godzilla comes to town, already in possession of a hundred similar operations. He offers a pile of money for Huck Finn's Electricity Hut, and now Godzillacorp has a hundred and one subsidiaries all over the USA. Clearly, Godzillacorp is an interstate entity, so it is not subject to the regulations that kept Huck's prices so low in the past. The laws that once prevented Godzilla from buying up large numbers of small independent utilities were largely repealed during the legislative bonanza that brought you Enron. The coup de grace was the repeal of the Depression-era Public Utility Holding Company Act last fall. And while the giant lizard is buying up all the small utility companies, the natural gas needed to generate electricity is running out. Scarcity will impose cuts in energy use, and whoever controls the generation and delivery system will be choosing where to cut. If the weather is harsh (perhaps because of a radically destabilized climate), access to energy is a matter of life and death. And if Godzilla is in charge, will Huck and his dirt-poor client base be around much longer? Deregulation + arbitrage = hypothermia.

And whom do we find at the heart of all this? Warren Buffett

-Goldilox

I have always maintained that Buffett's pennies-on-the-dollar public gas and pipeline purchases were of much greater import than his silver and dollar side bets. It looks like Michael Ruppert agrees.

Whether or not one agrees with Michael's conclusions, the questions themselves are important, and get little airtime anywhere.

Basically, if Peak oil [energy] is either a reality or perceived reality, how does that drive geopolitics, given hydrocarbon's already very political nature?

I think a similar question can be asked of Belgian and TC's "politicos are engineering freegold" statements. Do you mean the same good-natured "politicos" that are "engineering" gold and silver price suppression? Is this practice really "for the good of all", or just to line their own pockets during the "global transitions".


Rook (1/5/06; 07:58:37MT - usagold.com msg#: 140123)
.,.
Invisible hand, feel free to leave comments like, the us invaded a -poor defenseless country iraq- on the link you provide and not on the forum.

Ten Bears (1/5/06; 07:53:59MT - usagold.com msg#: 140122)
RETURN TO CONSTITUTIONAL MONEY
http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/vieira/vieira.htm
Worth a look.

The Knife (1/5/06; 07:48:24MT - usagold.com msg#: 140121)
An oz. of gold or a share of Google?
Here's a question I pose for the forum. If someone offered you an oz. of gold or a share of Google stock, which would you choose? Why?

Consider that gold is $526 per oz. and Google is reaching a new high this week at $445 per share.


Belgian (1/5/06; 04:06:55MT - usagold.com msg#: 140120)
Trust in politicos and central bankers ?
It is NOT at all a matter of "trust", Goldilox ! It is about the global owners and producers of REAL wealth ! GLOBAL ...not local !!! Forget the island view - tunnel vision. Don't generalise (globalise) the $ standardisation.
Politicos + central bankers have to and are "structuring" the needed and wanted transition...out of the fake wealth standard into the real one. This is NOT a matter of trust but bare nescessety.

The $-gold-standard(s) IS (are) as socialist/collectivist as can possibly be. Freegold IS (real) capitalism !!! And the global wealth giants are not intimidated if and when some factions are going to label it as "unfair".


Belgian (1/5/06; 03:44:44MT - usagold.com msg#: 140119)
Gold standard versus Freegold
The non US-$ factions NEVER felt comfortable with the "evolving" $-gold-standard as fundamental of the $-IMS !

Idem dito for the parallel $-oil-standard as another fundamental of the $-IMS.

And it is not accidental that Russia has become very vocal about this "feeling uncomfortable" with these different forms of $ standardisation (Goldreserves-Gazprom !).

And herein lays the answer of Smeagol's question : The "new" producers and owners of wealth don't wish to be standardised with (by) the means of a $ unit of account (fiat money) as the expression of their (real) wealth !

Like it or not...but a fast growing and coherent coalition wants a regime change from the $ standard to a wealth standard.

Any IMS will have to adapt-restructure to this change or decline in -global- "use".

The reasoning is VERY simple : Stop plundering our wealth by the means of the $ standard (IMS)! The solution (change) is even simplier : Restore the notion of real wealth in a structured manner.

This globalizing world (the non US-$ factions) is definitely in the fast proceeding process of re-defining universal "WEALTH"...not the $ standardised mutant. No military power or killing is going to stop this evolution, anymore.



Knallgold (1/5/06; 03:23:02MT - usagold.com msg#: 140118)
@TC
Starting as a financial novice here at USAGold,now after all these many years of studying the monetary concepts I think I'm coming very close to hit the G-Spot (pun intended) on the matter and formulating my own conclusions.But a complete change in the 5000year old monetary (Gold) history makes it necessary to pedantically think through the remaining grey areas/potential flaws-it will be something for a weekend post and I still need further read of "Geld,Gold und Gottspieler".But you touched already on it with the following:

"That's why gold must exist outside and away from the controllable aspects of the currency and monetary system. That way it will not share in the vulnerability to corruption."--TC

KG:do you see the contradiction here?Particularly with the next statement:

"There's really not much we can do, personally, to control our monetary system or its controllers."--TC

Next:

"But we CAN take control of our money, by making sure it is as secure as solid gold"--TC

KG:Admittedly I changed a small bit.

"Fortunately, a coalition of deep thinking politicos and central bankers have apparently seen the light.."--TC

KG:then,they could as easily operate something like a Goldstandard,no?

It all somehow boild down to corruption (morals) and the Gestalt (and value or not) of money'some things might be semantics and I try to sort this out from now on.

Randy,no need to answer now (guess you deserve a good sleep anyway) nor later,I posted this just that your knowledge about my thinking gets a more solid foundation and that you will understand my future posts.And frankly I have to more carefully read all the great posts from yesterday.




Goldilox (1/5/06; 03:13:07MT - usagold.com msg#: 140117)
Purchasing power
Your quote, "Don't let a few zeros confound your thinking. A currency can lose half of its purchasing power, or even 99 percent, over and over again, an infinite number of times."

I care not for the number zeroes, but a person can only starve to death once. Are you really so "collective" oriented, that the survival of a paper system is more important than the survival of the species?

This is where we really differ. Your major concern seems to be that the currency retains some flicker of life after having the stuffing stomped out of it. I believe the real issue is that a relatively few money changers suck up all the stuffing, starve a major segment of the populace, completely hinder real technical progress to shelter their friends' "franchises", and spend more than half of the world's productivity for weapons to retain their yoke upon civilization . . . and for some reason we seem to be too "civilized" to guillotine then for doing it, so they repeat it generation after generation, and we call them "Royalty".

The best most people can muster is to "stay out of Massa's RADAR", caring naught for arresting the slide of civilization into the next "Rishi-style" bye-bye.

OK, I'm an idealist, but I've been called worse, especially in the last few days!


Goldilox (1/5/06; 02:51:41MT - usagold.com msg#: 140116)
Deep thinking politicos
TC,

"Fortunately, a coalition of deep thinking politicos and central bankers have apparently seen the light and are taking giant steps to take gold all of the way out of the dollar-IMF deep-freezer of official control so that it will finally be able to serve us all in the above-stated manner as the savings/reserve asset par excellence."

You're obviously a lot more trusting of these "deep thinking politicos" than most of us are. Some remember how they used gold confiscation to bail their bankster butts out of sling in 1933, at the price of prolonging the depression by about ten years - and still needed to "cull" the world's workforce by another 50 million souls during the decade after that.

I've also been thinking about your example of WWI as a war under the gold standard. While the gold-standard was in effect, it was at the prodding of JP Morgan who bet on the wrong side that the US entered the war to bail him out of Britain's ultimate financial collapse. Without the massive debt engine, it might not have been a "world war" at all. So while the gold standard was ofiicially in place, the Keynesian principle of rule by overwhelming debt was already in play, and the destruction of the gold standard was more than likely the result.


TownCrier (1/5/06; 02:43:14MT - usagold.com msg#: 140115)
Goldilox,
Don't let a few zeros confound your thinking. A currency can lose half of its purchasing power, or even 99 percent, over and over again, an infinite number of times.

Usually the managers knock off a few zeros for convenience sake, and the system keeps on truckin'.

Imagine if we didn't have a numerical based pricing system for our currency, but used something like a spectrum of colors (like the cheap plastic poker chips you played with as a child). Then, there wouldn't be any of this 'zero' dilemma between us. We would quickly agree that, as the prices tended to get larger due to depreciation of the currency, the colors of the chips in primary circulation would tend to evolve along down the spectrum, always heading in the direction that represented an adequate degree of purchasing power.

Forgive me if that's too abstract. I don't know how else to put it.

And again, don't loose track of my primary point. Money depreciates, and there's nothing to be gained in whining about that fact of life except earning a degree in self-humiliation.

So the thing to do is preserve our energy, gather up our currencies, and use them to choose gold as our means of savings. There's really nothing else for it.

And with that, I relinquish the floor to the night shift. Tidings, good fellows!

R.


TownCrier (1/5/06; 02:26:12MT - usagold.com msg#: 140114)
Knallgold,
Since you're apparently apt to agree that currency SYSTEMS are vulnerable to corruption, why can't we use that as an instructive premise to solve our problem at hand?

Nobody wants to risk losing their life savings.

Nobody wants their savings to be corrupted.

Nobody wants their savings to be even remotely vulnerable to corruption and loss.

That's why gold must exist outside and away from the controllable aspects of the currency and monetary system. That way it will not share in the vulnerability to corruption.

There's really not much we can do, personally, to control our monetary system or its controllers.

But we CAN take control of our savings, by making sure it is as secure as solid gold.

Fortunately, a coalition of deep thinking politicos and central bankers have apparently seen the light and are taking giant steps to take gold all of the way out of the dollar-IMF deep-freezer of official control so that it will finally be able to serve us all in the above-stated manner as the savings/reserve asset par excellence.

R.


The Invisible Hand (1/5/06; 02:12:29MT - usagold.com msg#: 140113)
Iran is Cheney's Next Target
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_allen_l__060104_iran_is_cheney_s_nex.htm
SNIP
It's the financial threat of Iran introducing a euro-based energy exchange.

http://www.raisethehammer.org/index.asp?id=133

SNIPS
Ironically, America originally invaded Iraq - a poor, defenseless country - partly to send a message to other oil producing countries not to rock the petrodollar system, but the real message for small countries is that they need to present a credible deterrent threat or risk being ignored and/or invaded.
+
Iran may, indeed, be attempting to acquire nuclear weapons. However, it also has a "legitimate" interest in developing nuclear power, since its own oil reserves are already post-peak and it aims to continue in its role as an energy exporter. Iran is a signatory in good standing to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and has openly informed the International Atomic Energy Agency of its intentions as requried by the Treaty.
However, Iran's presumed attempt to acquire nuclear weapons is only the politically acceptable excuse for America's threats.


Goldilox (1/5/06; 02:11:58MT - usagold.com msg#: 140112)
clear, but still circuitous
"To be sure, the result of that management 'failure' is ultimately that the purchasing power of the currency unit falls to nearly zero, but other than that the currency as a utility is alive and kicking, same as it ever was."

When my bottle of beer is empty, the bottle may retain its utility, but the beer is still gone.

Your currency of "near-zero value" may also retain its "utility" as a concept, but the value is still gone.

As a living being, the basic "utility" of that currency can be measured in its acceptability for goods. If that is "near-zero", it has lost its function as far as I'm concerned, if it no longer purchases what I need to sustain life.


TownCrier (1/5/06; 02:11:44MT - usagold.com msg#: 140111)
Liberty Head, it was SO self-evident you apparently miss-identified it
I guess the next time I consider 'asking' a rhetorical question, I need to bear in mind that the written word does not convey the sentiment as clearly as the spoken word.

Despite your handling of the affair, you did at least arrive close to the intended target zone. Namely, it boils down to finding the mechanism by which one can deal with one's would-be controllers -- and if a suitable degree of outright control is unachieveable, then the next order of business is probably closer to finding a means to survive/thrive the best you can underground.

Gold is useful in either event.

R.


TownCrier (1/5/06; 01:33:33MT - usagold.com msg#: 140110)
Goldi msg#: 140106, short memory
Your forgetting our intermediate discussion.

Technically it isn't the currency, per se, which fails, but rather it's the management of the monetary officials which fails.

To be sure, the result of that management 'failure' is ultimately that the purchasing power of the currency unit falls to nearly zero, but other than that the currency as a utility is alive and kicking, same as it ever was.

Let's not miss my overarching point which is this. Money (supply), irrespective of the type of currency unit chosen by the sovereign, has a tendency to grow as the economy grows, and atop that feature the sovereign management has a Keynesian tendency to fight monetary contractions associated with downturns in the economy (à la the classic "business cycle"). The consequence is a ratcheting effect that, as Flatliner would readily agree, points to perpetual inflation (and depreciation of the currency unit) to one degree or another.

Hence the prudential motivation of industrious people to choose physical gold -- gold outside of the monetary system -- as their means of secure saving without fears of being taken down with the currency depreciation as would affect any such coinage that trades at par with the currency unit itself.

Is there a way for me to make this any clearer?

R.


Knallgold (1/5/06; 01:22:19MT - usagold.com msg#: 140109)
@GoldStandard/@all
It must be the power they can excercise through these paper currencies.Like the pattern of the flag ruling was of utmost importance in the old times.Now we come nearer to the moral imperative questions TC likes to avoid.But I'll help him:who says the PTB can't be more moral?Who says the Goldstandard needs a fixed price,must be a "centrally governed" standard?Why not a personal Goldstandard?

Liberty Head hit the nail with that one: "since any currency system will eventually fail once it is corrupted, perhaps it would be more instructive to ask what currency system would offer the most resistance to corruption? "


Goldilox (1/5/06; 01:16:14MT - usagold.com msg#: 140108)
Benefits of being the "reserve currency"
@ Gold Standard,

"I simply cannot understand how pricing a commodity in a different currency can cause any such concerns - surely it is simply a matter of clicking a mouse on the unit of international transfer (be it USD, Euro, Yen, CHF or whatever)."

Ah, but you are forgetting who gets the benefit of those mouse clicks. Remember, 96% of the dollar inflation has been "absorbed" back by the creators as their "commission" for control and creation. Once the widespread use deteriorates, the built-in profit of the creditor is disrupted, and the game table is releveled. Worse yet, the debt might have be repaid, instead of inflated away.

One analogy is the "bank" in BlackJack, always owned by the house, vs. the "bank" in Bacccarat, which moves around the table, player-to-player. If one assumes that the "bank" has an advantage, the IMF-dollar system hardly wants to "share" that advantage with other currencies, as it is the very size and continued growth of the international debt that is keeping the US $ afloat.

Once the international debt stops growing, the pyramid scheme begins to unravel.


Liberty Head (1/5/06; 01:11:25MT - usagold.com msg#: 140107)
TC Questions
TC
"How exactly does a gold standard prevent a war when the standard is so easily suspended in accordance with the political will to do so?"

Liberty Head
TC, must you persist in asking duplicitous questions?
If a gold standard must first be suspended than it must be preventing something, right?
So the gold standard isn't the problem, it's something else.
Your question is like asking; How exactly does the Constitution prevent a war when it is so easily suspended in accordance with the political will to do so?
These questions lead to no useful understanding. They are camouflage.
A more useful question would be; How do we contain the gov't?

Best Wishes




Goldilox (1/5/06; 01:01:53MT - usagold.com msg#: 140106)
Axioms
@ TC,

"Revisiting square one, the premise was that a fiat currency NEVER fails, but a gold standard (currency) ALWAYS fails eventually."

Ain't buying this one, for reasons I already proposed.

Your explanation of why FIAT never fails only work for the outside oberver, not for the participant.

Absolutes, while great for armchair quarterbacking, never take the hits dealt in a real game.


Gold Standard (1/5/06; 01:01:47MT - usagold.com msg#: 140105)
Oil in Euros

It is often published that the intent to sell oil in Euros (e.g. Saddam Hussein 2000, Iran 2006) is deeply offensive to the World Oil Powers That Be, and that armed intervention will occur soon afterwards.

I simply cannot understand how pricing a commodity in a different currency can cause any such concerns - surely it is simply a matter of clicking a mouse on the unit of international transfer (be it USD, Euro, Yen, CHF or whatever).

It's not that oil will be priced any <b>differently</b> in Euros or whatever, as the price must take cognisance of the world market price.

Then again, maybe I am being simplistic. Can anyone on the forum enlighten me?




ViewYesterday's Discussion.


Permission to reprint is hereby granted where the USAGOLD name is cited along with our web address, mailing address and phone number. For electronic reproductions, citing the post heading and the http://www.usagold.com/cpmforum/ website address as the source is sufficient.

usa gold coins and bullion
Centennial Precious Metals
Gold coins & bullion since 1973

P.O. Box 460009
Denver, Colorado 80246-0009

We educate first-time investors!

We invite you to contact our trading desk
for quotes and purchase information.

Buy gold in U.S. 1-800-869-5115
Buy gold in EU 00-800-8720-8720

6:00am to 6:00pm MtnTime; Mon-Fri

admin@usagold.com

Remember: It's your purchase of gold from USAGOLD-Centennial Precious Metals that nourishes these pages

Click to verify BBB accreditation and to see a BBB report.

Friday November 21
website support: sitemaster@usagold.com
site map - site index
The USAGOLD logo and stylized gold coin pile are trademarks of Michael J. Kosares.
© 1997-2008 Michael J. Kosares / USAGOLD All Rights Reserved