LogoHeader Coinstack
USAGOLD Menu BAR

Welcome to the USAGOLD Gold Discussion Archives. The archives of this gold discussion forum are a treasure trove of information to educate investors about protecting their wealth through portfolio diversification with private gold ownership. The discussion forum also covers the wider issues of the past, present, and future role of gold in international monetary policy and the dynamics of the modern gold markets...

 

(Discussion Forum Hall of Fame)

(The Gold Trail)

("Thoughts!" by ANOTHER)

 

The opinions posted by all guests are expressly their own and do not necessarily represent the views of the management or staff of USAGOLD - Centennial Precious Metals. The hosting of the public discussion shall therefore not be construed as an endorsement by USAGOLD - Centennial Precious Metals of any of the opinions posted here.

 

FORUM ARCHIVES
Select date of the archive you wish to view

Month Day Year
Archives date back to September 22, 1998


WELCOME TO THE ARCHIVES!

(View Today's Discussion) (View Previous Day's Discussion) (View Next Day's Discussion)

ARCHIVED DISCUSSION FROM 6/22/2001
All times are U.S. Mountain Time

(Yesterday's Discussion.)

Journeyman (06/22/01; 22:36:44MT - usagold.com msg#: 56683)
P.S @Camel (6/21/01; 23:01:42MT - usagold.com msg#: 56616)

P.S

Camel, would you care to attempt a defense of real-world socialism as it played out in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia, etc.?

Regards,
Journeyman


Journeyman (06/22/01; 22:33:34MT - usagold.com msg#: 56682)
Yur a bit misinformed about libertarians @Camel (6/21/01; 23:01:42MT - usagold.com msg#: 56616)

Hi Came!

Ah, yur a bit misinformed about a few things, libertarian philosophy among them.

Also so-called social-security.

And as far as "Oreo," you'd better plan on a few years of study before you can make any points that even interest him.

When I get a chance, if your interested, I can give you a few clues where you can find out about REAL libertarians, instead of the straw-man you've been attacking.

There are some libertarians that favor big business, just as there some democrats that do. But libertarians don't favor big business, and in fact only free markets, which you won't find anywhere in the world, because mainly big business, in cahoots with big labor and big government don't like competition.

I've made some extensive posts about this elsewhere, but since I'm on the road, I don't have the facilities to post them right now.

Most of the propaganda you've absorbed about free markets is just that, propaganda. For example, the first anti-child labor laws were passed against local governments who used children as chimney sweeps.

Many other things we all know about nasty business are either not true or actually true about big businesses supported by big government so they have monopolies.

Business are not necessarily good - - - but keep in mind, they supply most jobs.

If you believe in freedom, you're a libertarian. If you don't, you're something else.

Regards,
Journeyman


Black Blade (06/22/01; 21:45:05MT - usagold.com msg#: 56681)
More On Drill Rigs - Gold vs. Petroleum
I should have said that the number of US drill rigs in the US has more than doubled. I have seen some drill rigs and support vehicles for mining exploration companies that I have worked with who are based in Nevada and Montana drilling in Wyoming lately. The situation is going critical and now the NG people are looking to "beg, borrow, and steal" to keep up with NG demand and it appears to be a losing battle. The energy crisis is coming to a crossroads where production can not keep up with demand.

This also brings up another point. With metals mining exploration concerns bailing out of gold country and into energy, what does that mean for gold mining when the turnaround occurs and no more exploration drill rigs are to be found? It only means that US gold exploration and mining is in serious jeopardy. The major gold companies are their own worst enemies. Ultimately it also means that gold production will drop off even as high grading ramps up in the struggle to avoid failure and gold reserves are not replaced. In other words, US gold mining is toast.

Of course a recent NY Times poll has revealed that the vast majority say they will gladly pay higher energy costs to save the environment. We shall see soon enough. The reaction of the Grasshoppers on the left coast indicates otherwise. Protesters "pied" an energy company executive in California today. I guess that proves that when it comes down to high prices and the environment, the environment loses no matter what psuedo-environmentalists say now.

- Black Blade


R Powell (06/22/01; 21:38:54MT - usagold.com msg#: 56680)
auspec
I wonder who is buying (from the Midas report) and before I get my question posted you have a very plausible and probable answer for me. Very nicely done. The Cassandra part of your personna is working perfectly.
Thanks
Rich
P.S. We belive your multi personal identity is in a constant state of flux and that your composit makeup may sometimes also include other well known posters from many internet sites and some government agencies. Sleep well.


Black Blade (06/22/01; 21:27:18MT - usagold.com msg#: 56679)
Baker Hughes - U.S. rig count up 11, Canada down 15
http://biz.yahoo.com/rf/010622/n22487403.html

NEW YORK, June 22 (Reuters) - The number of rigs searching for oil and gas in the United States gained 11 to 1,277 during the week ending June 22, according to oil services firm Baker Hughes (NYSE:BHI). A year ago there were 893.

Black Blade: I was talking to a client this afternoon and he said that there were some drill rigs coming available. I asked where would they come from? He said Canada. I said that Canada was in a petroleum boom as well. He said that rates were better in the US and so they were bailing out of Canada for the US petroleum boom. From the latest BHI rig count it looks like it is quite possible that NG and oil rigs are migrating south. Even though the number of drill rigs working in NG, there has been no net gain in NG production. The production of NG can not keep up with demand. Yet there are about 275 new NG-fired power plants coming online by 2006 (now I hear that number is closer to 300). There will be a need to manufacture several hundred new rigs and train a few thousand rig workers just to keep pace. More likely is that a few thousand new rigs will need to be built over the next few years. The expanding economy and the "New Economy" demands "Cheap Energy" to survive. There is no more "Cheap Energy" and the end result is severe economic retraction or even economic collapse. Gold and silver as portfolio insurance is definitely a must.

Auspec - Oh my! I was impersonated once already, as was Leigh, journeyman, Zenidea, and possibly others. Cheers!


R Powell (06/22/01; 21:26:00MT - usagold.com msg#: 56678)
auspec
Thanks for the report from Midas stating that "over the past couple of months demand to secure physical gold over a period of a year has surged." We know Jipangu, a gold investment fund from Japan, is actively buying XAU stock and probably physical. Also in physical or stock equity form Gates, Buffet and Soros are all moving into precious metals positions. Reports from the neighbors indicate that large block buy orders are becoming more common in the mining stocks. I see this as the presence of large monied players or mutual fund money.
What immediately comes to mind is, How long can this off Comex demand go on before it is noticed and copied?
Buffet bought silver for many months (89 million ounces worth in 1997) before news leaked out early in 1998.
Second question is, Who is buying? Could be gold carry shorts from many years ago who no longer wish to re-lease.
Could it be big money anticipating higher POG? Could it be big time players sensing a squeeze or trying in initiate one? Could it be Uncle Sam trying to replace 1700 tons sold from the New York Fed. in a swop deal?
It would seem that any rumors of big buyers, if/once confirmed, would be our much talked about trigger for much higher POG. Will the market react to the rumor or insist on proof that demand is increasing? Just speculating at this but, if true, then the long side contracts on the future delivery months on Comex have probably been flowing into stronger ownership or are now owned by those less likely to sell on a small rise in POG. Short squeezes don't happen if the longs sell for small profits, short squeezes happen when the longs don't sell until prices rocket upward. Any thoughts??
Thanks also to Leigh for mentioning this.
Note for auspec, calm down, your identity is secure. You are a holographic confluence of Midas, uponroof, Tree, and the clarvoyant Cassandra. Occasionally you are only yourself.
The neighbors were asking today if Midas is Mr. Bill Murphy? I thought this was a given?
Kipling created a character named Kim who repeated his own name in times of stress to steel his courage and resolve and help him focus on the crisis at hand. In this way he reminded himself of who he was and thus what he had to do.
Go GATA and Buy more, Jipangu BC BN and Buy direct
Rich Rich Rich


auspec (06/22/01; 21:23:20MT - usagold.com msg#: 56677)
Leigh
"What might this mean to us as gold investors?" Speaking of an organized bailout of the shorts using official gold.
This is what some refer to as nirvana, checkmate, or the Big Kahauna {sp?}. The gold speaking world will have NO trouble in proper interpretation of this event, should it come about {I say should, but it IS happening now, clearly}.
The bailoutees get to join the ranks of LTCM {hopefully}, and the bailouters get to display their quickly emptying shelves. Oh my! They don't bail em out......gold flies, they do bail them out....... gold flies, which will they do?
This is a very quiet place tonite Leigh, truly 'dull' for sure {smile}. We could pretend to be Black Blade and put up multiple impressive posts, but, alas, there is only one BB and we would surely be found out and prosecuted for impersonating another poster. We only get so many chances around here, you know!
Best to you, thanks for keeping me from posting back and forth to myself.
a {BBwannaB}


auspec (6/22/01; 20:50:20MT - usagold.com msg#: 56676)
Chapman Revisited
From Robert Chapman:
May 14, 2001

"Our intelligence sources have informed us that Alan Greenspan has given the bullion banks until the end of May to clear up their hedging and outstanding gold derivative positions. Evidentially this process has been going on for some time. Furthermore, Tony Blair will try to make available, at the upcoming British gold auction, additional gold which will go to banks designated by Greenspan. We were also told that ****AngloGold will sell forward a designated amount of gold to banks also specified by Alan Greenspan****. Our source for this intelligence has been very accurate in the past. They also said they thought that gold would break out over $275.00 an ounce by Friday." END, {My ***s added}

From tonight's Midas:

"There were all kinds of queries about the AngloGold/Barrick hedging accord alert that Johm Brimlow and I put out this morning as the COMEX gold trading session commenced. The information came from two of Mitsui's {a highly regarded bullion dealer} websites. Hard to say what it means, but it is more curious smoke....."
"Now, we hear of something possibly brewing regarding AngloGold and Barrick, both of whom are very close to J.P. Morgan/Chase. Again, Morgan's Frank Arisman is on the board of AngloGold and Morgan's office in Toronto is on the floor below Barrick's." END

Comments: Seems remotely possible that both these gents {and Mitsui} mentioned AngloGold in relation to hedging of gold in "interesting" times. ****Gosh its going to be terribly difficult to figure out to whom BarAnglo may be sending some future production****. Any clues out there, anyone?? {snicker}. Is there anyone around that is hopelessly overleveraged in gold? Who would JPM/C possibly turn to in times of 'stress'?
Oh well, we'll probably never figure it out. I can't even spell the word BAILOUTT!! Wonder if JPM/C is about to have an identity crisis??
auspec{tacle}



auspec (6/22/01; 20:03:34MT - usagold.com msg#: 56675)
Leverage!
From Midas

"The derivatives on the books of J.P. Morgan Chase are something like 287 to 1 against their assets. Long Term Capital Management was 294 to 1 before they went tapioca."

Whoever said banking stocks were stodgy? I'm gonna load up on JPM/C next week and go for broke with them!
Got JPM/C?? Got an identity?


auspec (6/22/01; 19:57:46MT - usagold.com msg#: 56674)
TIF
Now I'm having an identity crisis! But at least I don't think I'm a plant {chortle}.

Tree in the Forest (6/22/01; 19:36:47MT - usagold.com msg#: 56673)
R Powell
But Rich, I thought you were auspec! ;-)

auspec (6/22/01; 19:20:17MT - usagold.com msg#: 56672)
A Touch Of Midas
Snipping now- Sipping Later
"I will explain in a bit, but first let me delve into what I meant when I declared that the physical gold market is on fire. Over the past couple of months demand to secure physical gold over a period of a year has surged. It is not easy to secure deals of sizeable tonnage and the NEW buyers are scurrying around the world to make these deals."

"As these deals are consummated, physical supply now flowing to help meet present demand will suddenly not be there. That will start to show up in rising gold premiums in the various world markets. By then gold will be flying and it will be apparent to all the gold is "on fire." The important time to receive information such as this is before it is generally known to the gold world. That is why it is coming your way at this point in time."

"By the way, the numbers I am talking about are staggering. They amount to as much as 10% of total gold supply coming out of the mines."

Note: Running around to various mines with Billions of $'s looking for the next years production, eh? Works for me.



R Powell (6/22/01; 17:46:50MT - usagold.com msg#: 56671)
Who am I
Identity
I wish to unequivocally state that I am not Randy. Nor am I Lafisrap. Also neither of these gentleman, whether individually or as a unit, is me.
Rich


Leigh (06/22/01; 17:09:37MT - usagold.com msg#: 56670)
Tonight's Midas Report
Here are two paragraphs from tonight's Midas report by Bill Murphy. What might this mean to us as gold owners?

"If my scenario is somewhat on the money, then the Bush Administration will announce that while they do not agree with the Clinton Administration policies because it hurt so many poor gold producing countries, etc., they had a right to do so. It will not surprise me if they, and maybe other countries, also announce that they are delivering gold to the bullion dealer shorts to avoid a debacle and then tell the public that they are doing so to avoid financial panic.

"What a scene that would be. While it will create a flap, Joe and Jane Investor, who care not of gold or principles, will be relieved that the Bush Administration has taken action to prevent their 401K's from being further decimated. Those that are outraged, such as the likes of GATA and various members of Congress, will be told to direct their venom at the Clinton Administration and the Democrats."


Belgian (06/22/01; 17:05:08MT - usagold.com msg#: 56669)
@ Auspec
Sir, forget about the details. They are not important.
I'll try to explain briefly, how I feel about what is happening from the gold producers site. FWIW of course !

The past 10/15 years, a lot has changed in the goldmining business. Mining has become a high tech enterprise.
The speed of plundering mother earth has multiplied tenfold. Check how most of the mines adapted to the idiotic gold valuation (including hedge appearence). Result : mining gold is not as exclusive as before.

The core goldminers lost their dominance and control of the complete gold cycle. De Beers history is an example as to understand what I mean with "under control". They survived synthetic diamonts (zirkon) and were able to encapsle all brave competitors. Diamont prices have been manipulated for already a very long time. The diamont cartel has never been challenged. The present ethic assault is simply countered with taking it private and go under cover. etc...etc...

In the fragmented (uncontrollable) mining industry, Au has reliable natural allies who can retain their full independance ( Harmony is a South African company). These allies have mutual interests. Eliminate small wild cat goldmining and let the masters rule the amount of gold on offer, in line with their mining plans and developments.

This reorganisation of mined gold on offer is what I conclude out of the scarce and superficial press releases.
I don't use a microscope to analyse every possible arrangement between producers. Relevant is the general teneur and intentions. Once you are in control with having spend the least on financial resources (ex Minorco speciality) you can organise the hedging mismatch at your conveniance ! Gather the survivers and suffocate the ballast. It is evident that this takes time to deploy, especially if you want to realize it with the absolute minimum on ammunition. A typical and very old "modus operandi". An authoritarian approach in contrast with open (more or less honest) competition.

The De Beers analogy is relevant as per example the different challenges that Russia/Zaire/Angola/Liberia, tried to organise to undermine the De Beers control. Kind of Diamont CBs floodding the market with plundered diamonts.
Each time the authoritarian position had to be reconquered.
No extra efforts were made to absorb the excessive offer with marketing tools. The gold consumption for jewelry runs at satisfactory volume. And it would take an enormous effort to stimulate investment demand for the time being.
Thus the only option left is gaining control on supply and in the mean time making sure that you will keep it for quite some time. A ruler's strategy ?

As you know, I'm strongly relying on my intuition and remain open minded and ready for swift adaption if the chosen theory doesn't make sense anymore.

The above is absolutely not related to the Gold fundamentals and possible future that are discussed here at lenght. It is only a reflexion on 1 of the 3 (underground) holders of gold. But IMO an important one now and later.

My repeating ad nauseum that there are 1 million reasons and arguments to accumulate physical gold, encounters a lot of compassionate smiling, whilst on the GOLD_activism path. I'm getting it slowly but surely "Why". Allow me some time for finetuning these toughts.

It is not because I'm heavily relying on my physical that the actions/intentions/strategies of the dominant goldproducers must be ignored. They are very close to the present and future reality. A microscopic vieuw might put us on the wrong footh. Mirages (fata morganas) in the desert or a Colombus sailor, gone mad, and crying "land in sight", and causing rebellion.
Might be that I'm overestimating the core goldproducers role and awareness of the future for Gold. Still I'll continue to place all the inspiration adsorbed on this forum against or in line with acts and deeds of the core producers.

For example : is it possible that Au got free hands in organising an orderly unwinding of the gold drama ?
Is a Barrick link a conditio sine qua non for getting the job ? Some fantasy doesn't harm, does it ?


Black Blade (6/22/01; 16:57:12MT - usagold.com msg#: 56668)
Is the Fed Flummoxed?
http://www.smartmoney.com/theeconomy/index.cfm?Story=200106211

Snippit:

THINGS AREN'T happening the way they're supposed to. We're six months into the Federal Reserve's aggressive campaign to stimulate economic growth with lower interest rates, and the economy is getting worse, not better. Has the central bank lost its magic? Are policy makers powerless? According to Thursday's Washington Post, some officials at the Fed are growing "increasingly concerned" that the economy isn't responding to lower interest rates the way it has historically.

Black Blade: The FED is in "sheer panic" mode. They're aggressively cutting rates because they and others know that the market is in the crapper. They also know that the contrived and massaged BLS data is not being accepted at face value. The more aggressive the FED rate cuts, the more obvious it is that something is seriously amiss. Many now are questioning what does the FED know that they must cut rates so sharply, so quickly and even between FOMC meetings? It is beginning to look more ugly all the time. More earnings warnings are due out next week.

Waiting for the other shoe to drop.


auspec (6/22/01; 16:39:02MT - usagold.com msg#: 56667)
Gentlemen
Nothing dull about that exchange.

Randy (@ The Tower) (6/22/01; 16:30:40MT - usagold.com msg#: 56666)
To Lafisrap (msg#: 56659), regarding HoF for ORO (01/13/01)
http://www.usagold.com/halloffame.html
Lafisrap: "If the candidate post is actually in the Hall of Fame, I apologize for my mistake"

R: I accept your apology.

Lafisrap: "I recall you posting a statement as to which qualifying candidate posts are selected for inclusion into the Hall of Fame. As I remember it, you stated that not all qualifying candidate posts are automatically included. Am I mistaken here also?"

R: I would surmise that is indeed how you remember it.

To be sure, I have (again) provided you with the URL so that you may (to your own satifaction) reaffirm all that which "is", and perhaps "is not" on each issue.

Lafisrap: "...the current front-running candidate for the identity of FOA/Another is Randy."

R: Whatever your intention, I can accept this notion of yours in no other regard than equivalent to the highest order of compliments. Thank you for your generous overestimation of my abilities.


Black Blade (06/22/01; 16:13:16MT - usagold.com msg#: 56665)
US Interior Department Looks to Western Energy Resources
http://www.slb.com/print_story.cfm?baid=1&storyid=255298&printable=1

Snippits:

WASHINGTON, June 21 (Reuters) - Amid broad opposition to drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska, the Interior Department is taking a closer look at untapped oil and gas reserves in Western states, a department official said on Thursday. "Within the continental United States, the western part of the country seems the most prospective," Chip Groat, director of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), said at a briefing for lawmakers and congressional aides. Western states like Wyoming, Utah and Nevada have attractive reserves, he said. However, many doubt the Bush administration will have any luck winning rights - as it would like - to sanction energy exploration on national monument lands in the West.

Black Blade: Somehow between sexual encounters with "that woman," Bubba put several prime energy targets off-limits by executive order. One such target was a desolate stretch of desert in Southern Utah called Escalante Staircase that was declared a national park with dictatorial powers. This was done as a favor to environmentalist supporters such as Utah resident Robert Redford and to punish the voters of Utah who twice voted him into third place behind Ross Perot during the general presidential election. It probably does not matter though as the fundamental questions come into play such as - where will they find the drill rigs? Where will they find experienced crews and staff? How fast can they link together the infrastructure before the economy collapses under the high energy costs? Can they avoid prolonged environmental legal action? Etc. etc. etc.


R Powell (06/22/01; 16:10:22MT - usagold.com msg#: 56664)
one fer day
That one being the XAU which was up slightly.
The lease rates were down.
August POG contract was down $0.30 to 273.30 and July silver was down two cents to $4.303. Coincidentially, lumber was down with gold and soybeans was down with silver. The CRB (a commodities index) was down today and is now at 206.20. The dollar remains strong and commodities remain weak. All metals were down today as were all the grains. There was no rally this Spring for corn, wheat or beans. Cotton remains priced about 25% below the cost of production before the costs of fertilizer and fuel went up.
I once thought nothing can remain priced below the cost of production for very long. This is not so. Many commodities traders confess to buying sugar when sugar was shipped in burlap bags and the trading price of sugar was below the cost of that bag. That's a bag of sugar delivered for less than the cost of the empty container it was transported in. Many of those traders that bought at that low price lost money as, you guessed it, sugar prices went even lower!
Most analysts believe that the pre WA POG low will prove to be the lowest POG for years to come but the cost of production for gold, silver or anything else is not necessarily the lowest tradable price. Commodities are often bought or sold on a limit basis, that is only if the price is above a certain level or below one. I wonder if CPM would sell me silver eagles at a specified low price if Michael already had my money in his desk drawer?
What's that you say? Silver trading at $4.20/ounce? Didn't Rich have an order to but 100 coins at whatever price per coin they retail for when POS is $4.20? Yup, and another order for more at POS at $4.00/ounce. It would be complicated and bear watching but this might increase business. Any interest from the money in my account before purchases goes to the CPM Christmas Fund, of course. Enough money in many accounts would allow CPM to also buy stock (gold and silver) on the same "limit order" basis.
I really don't believe I'd like to put a business under this type of pressure but given enough ambition and enthusiasm and advertisement, it could generate a delivery only exchange( no offsetting of positions) in precious metals to rival the Comex. Two exchanges! One for paper trading and occasional delivery called the Comex, located in New York and one for delivery every time called the Kosares, located in Denver, Colorado!!
Michael, I hope you don't mind my playing with a precious metals exchange (exchange of fiat for physical), delivery only business. All in fun and to provoke thoughts about how things are exchanged among us.
Happy weekend to all!
Rich


Netking (06/22/01; 16:01:45MT - usagold.com msg#: 56663)
Lafisrap
Lafisrap(56659)
With the greatest respect to you Sir, does this matter? Is it worth having "bloodied noses" over regardless of who's right or wrong? Lets focus on the great PM analysis, financial and economic debate this site is respected for. I look forward to reading FOA's next post with anticipation, regardless of who his real identity is, or mine for that matter! kind regards to you, Netking.


Black Blade (06/22/01; 15:57:42MT - usagold.com msg#: 56662)
Officials From Western States Analyze Power Rate Caps, Worry They May Face Shortages
http://biz.yahoo.com/apf/010622/power_megawatt_scramble.html
West Analyzes Energy Price Caps

Snippit:

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- When power supplies stretch thin across the West this summer, who will decide whether Silicon Valley computers, Washington apple orchards or Las Vegas casinos get first dibs on what's left?

Black Blade: I vote casinos in Vegas.


Centennial Precious Metals, Inc. / USAGOLD (6/22/01; 15:38:24MT - usagold.com msg#: 56661)
Hard assets... Easy access!
http://www.usagold.com/onlinestore/special.html



"'Good as gold' speaks only of yellow metal:
a Truth lost as often as money
by players in leverage, credit banking systems, and Ponzi schemes."

-- R. Strauss




JMB (6/22/01; 14:45:29MT - usagold.com msg#: 56660)
Randy
Have you ever heard of Sir Permafrost? Your worst nightmare may be coming back.

Lafisrap (6/22/01; 14:37:52MT - usagold.com msg#: 56659)
Randy
Randy said: I cannot say "correct" or "incorrect" because only you can know what you believe or not. But from the
looks of it, I would say "Correct. You DO apparently believe they did not appear in the HOF." And with regard to that belief, your belief would be completely without merit, wrong, and unjustified other than as the product of an ill-informed opinion formed apparently without research. Have I made myself clear without mincing words?

Me: Randy, your tactic is one of deliberate misinterpretation. It does you no honor. The Hall of Fame candidate post I speak of is:

***
Hall of Fame Message nominated:
ORO (01/13/01; 06:27:44MT - usagold.com msg#: 45600)

The last two paragraphs were cut off in posting, reatached in
ORO (01/13/01; 06:31:13MT - usagold.com msg#: 45602)

Nomination:
Parsifal (01/13/01; 12:34:32MT - usagold.com msg#: 45612)

First Second:
Gandalf the White (01/13/01; 14:03:04MT - usagold.com msg#: 45618)

Second Second:
JavaMan (01/13/01; 14:11:48MT - usagold.com msg#: 45620)

Third Second:
Elwood (01/13/01; 16:03:43MT - usagold.com msg#: 45625)

Fourth Second:
auspec (01/13/01; 17:40:55MT - usagold.com msg#: 45631)

Perhaps a Fifth Second at the bottom of:
Looking Up (01/13/01; 19:44:18MT - usagold.com msg#: 45635)
(appears to contain some mangled text at its bottom)
***

If the candidate post is actually in the Hall of Fame, I apologize for my mistake; however, upon searching both Hall of Fame page one and page two for both the date of the candidate post (01/13/01) and the cadidate post's number (45600) I can find no evidence of it in the Hall of Fame. Additionally, I recall you posting a statement as to which qualifying candidate posts are selected for inclusion into the Hall of Fame. As I remember it, you stated that not all qualifying candidate posts are automatically included. Am I mistaken here also?

In your most recent reply to me, you ignored the opportunity I gave you to address several other points I made. Thus, you have the opportunity again:

[In response to SLATT's query as to the origination of the Gold Trail]
***
The answer here can, of course, be spun several ways. The plain truth is that the Gold Trail was erected after one of FOA's upsets as a consequence of the discussion here on this forum. The Gold Trail was the result of just one part of the ongoing drama surrounding FOA/Another and was intended to help insulate him from the unpleasantries that can occur in open debate. FOA had essentially thrown a fit and stomped off, threatening never to return (not the first time), thus, the Gold Trail.
***

Back to the identity of FOA/Another, I have no way to be certain, but upon applying Parsifal's patented analysis of rhetorical styles (less of an analysis of usage, syntax, etc., and more an analaysis of phychological techniques used in analyzing rhetorical motives (read Kenneth Burke)), the current front-running candidate for the identity of FOA/Another is Randy.

Carry on.

Lafisrap/Parsifal




dragonfly (6/22/01; 14:21:51MT - usagold.com msg#: 56658)
ANOTHER's Thoughts
Lately there have been a few posts that have stated something to the effect that the thoughts of ANOTHER have been ambiguous or mysterious. I thought I'd go back into the archives so generously provided by our host Michael and maintained by his stalwart companion Randy, to see if said allegations have merit. The following excerpt hopefully is sufficiently representative of what I think is an extremely clear expository style. Granted we might want to argue about the content, but the clarity is hardly in question.
I'd like to question the allegations of nefarious motives in a later post that draws upon the archives as well.

Here are the relevant thoughts of ANOTHER. Judge for yourself.

<<<"The urgent drive to create a new "reserve currency" began in the early 80s, after the last small "gold war". The road to making this new Euro did never include gold in large amounts, until the last few years! Even one year ago, the news would say, 5% or less. Today, we speak of a much greater amount! This is interesting, yes? The BIS did "hatch" this deal in a very late fashion! The future of the Euro was found to be "weak", as the Middle East oil imports onto the continent would continue in dollars! This was so from the dollar being made strong in gold. Gold priced in dollars at near production cost, offered a "no switch currency" position, for oil. This position has been unstable for the last year, and the alternative of a switch to gold was in progress! You have read my "Thoughts" before. Now the BIS does offer to "change the rules of engagement", a real reserve currency is offered!

Few do grasp what is happening and why! They think the holding of gold reserves by the Euro is of a little point, as to what good are gold reserves? One cannot use gold as Marks or Yen to intervene in currency market to support the Euro. My friend, the BIS has played the, as you say, "big poker hand"! The holding of large reserves by the ECB and the withholding of sales from the market will not only bring the end of the London paper gold market, it will, thru a high USD gold price, "make the dollar weak in gold"! From this position, the dollar will lose the "oil backing" from the Middle East! At first, all oil for Europe will be in Euro's, then all producers want "strong currency"!

There is more: Many say, how to defend Euro without much currency reserves? If gold go to many thousands US, what will be used to bid for Euro as defense? I say, these persons will find a problem on their computer screens! You see, the Euro will start as "nothing", no holdings of size, anywhere! The dollar is held as reserves as "the stars in heaven"! It is to say, "the dollar will bid for the Euro", not "the Euro will bid for the dollar"! All currencies will "flow into the Euro for trade". But, if the Euro becomes so strong, how to compete in world trade? It will be the price of oil that will make the "trading field" level! The soaring US$ price of gold will make even a 10% Euro reserve be as 100% today, in USD! Oil will become, very, very cheap in Euros and allow that economy to do well! Many other countries will see this and also want to join the new "world reserve currency" that has become"the new world oil currency"!

The politics of the ECB? It is as a "side show"? We watch this new market, yes? Sir, my words take time. I did receive two E-mail's from you.">>>


goldfan (6/22/01; 14:13:11MT - usagold.com msg#: 56657)
ORO (msg#: 56624)


ORO thanks for your reply to me, and the Rothbard book link.

Some questions:

>>>Another's early message included an explicit message to the effect that when "someone important" is buying gold, its price is maintained artificially low, and when the time is right to sell, the price is artificially high. FOA calls the presumed "gold bubble" price the "world class wealth asset" value. The presumed purpose being to justify and warn of an upcoming intended market manipulation by the ECB in order to placate a gold favoring and gold holding party, Arab oil. The latter would support the currency of the Central Bank that does this for them with denomination of the oil trade. The alternative being settlement of oil trade in gold, or the purchase of gold by Arab oil with any (net) currency payments they get, as per Another's original proposal.<<<<<

So the arab world suddenly has access to a lot of US$ as the $POG increases dramatically, and the rest of the world must earn Euros in order to get arab oil. I guess I wonder how this really helps the arabs. How is it a safety net better than the alternative you mention, get gold for oil directly from the gold producing countries, and let them redistribute the oil for their own currency?

>>>So far, however, the opportune moment to "strike" has not come. I suppose the "US side" is still coming up with gold reserves with which to displace gold deposits from both CBs and private holdings at bullion banks, which keep the gold price down (meaning that this gold keeps the paper gold at par, thus maintaining the paper's ability to dictate price).<<<<

I don't understand this. The US side is selling gold reserves so the CBs and bullion banks don't have to? I thought that the manipulation was the sale by the CBs and bullion banks. ( a lot of it short).

>>>>> Thus the US side might be retaining <<<< >>>>My recent study of reserve growth shows a 4.7% annualized growth since 1995, up from near no growth from 1985 up to that time.

Retaining what?, a word missing....



>>>>The argument of gold prices falling if not used in contract transactions and in <<<<< >>>>>does not apply in this "gold bubble" scenario, where prices are pushed up
artificially.<<<<<

contract transactions and in what? A word missing....

LETS systems: Local Area Exchange Trading systems. I wonder if you have ever investigated these?

Some info at http://www.gmlets.u-net.com/design/home.html
or http://www.u-net.com/gmlets/resources/sidonie/home.html

They started in Canada as small area trading systems, where people would trade their work or goods amongst each other for a proportion of "green" money, and a proportion of cash. Bookkeeping of who owed who what would be done by central registry. Varying degrees of success, but I gather they are still gradually spreading around the globe. I'm finding it fun and instructive to play with the spreadsheet of who owes who what, imagining what happens with defaults, and if gold were substituted for the cash part of it. Also the influence of the cash or gold outside the area on those inside who have access to more or less of the outside "money".


Thanks again

Goldfan


megatron (6/22/01; 13:54:50MT - usagold.com msg#: 56656)
Gold article
Just got my copy of the biggest commie rag of them all, National Geographic, and there is a fabulous article and map of the ancient gold/silver treasures of the world. It's fantastic! The earliest manufactured gold pieces were found
in Bulgaria and were from 4000BC! The map alone is worth it for goldbugs.

Ironically, the article before it is about the ceaseless expansion of urban housing. Guess why that is?

Do you think 'one person in a thousand' will make the not-so-obtuse connection between the articles? I really doubt it.


JMB (6/22/01; 13:18:32MT - usagold.com msg#: 56655)
Stock Lies and Ticker Tape
#55076
I'll second that.

Stocks, Lies, and Ticker Tape (6/22/01; 13:14:33MT - usagold.com msg#: 56654)
IronHead
Peter Asher HOF post #55076, 5/31/01
The post that supplies the solution! IMHO

auspec (6/22/01; 13:03:58MT - usagold.com msg#: 56653)
Belgian
???????????
The gold 'DEBeers' wannabees watch continues and only questions arise for me, no answers apparent. What % of diamond flow did/does Debeers control? Anglo sells off assets {ounces} to Harmony, yet wants acquisitions of entire companies, GOLD for example? Selling the ounces gives ability to pick up market control/influence? Does Anglo need physical to cover hedge risks like Barrick, yet unloads precious? Must not be in as precarious a position as Barrick.
"Harmony {who} will join the "control" directives."?????????
Anglo has tentacles that reach deep into Harmony? Doesn't seem the Harmony Way? How do you see Harmony's 'independence'?
No surprise whatsoever that we would see something cohesive out of BarAnglo, but will have to dissect carefully what comes forth. They stand little to gain via a merger because they are already acting in conjunction with one another. Some joint strings, no? But you take BarAnglo and add a GOLD or a FN or another big player{s} to this fold and Debeers starts coming into focus. Did I mention Rio Tinto, who recently gobbled up North? And some wonder why so few miners stray from their cages?
I think Barrick is the one on the ropes and we look for their motive/payoff. Joe 6-puck may need another gold knight in tarnished armor to replace the flagship!
Final question....BarAnglo finds its way out of current mess intact, picks up another equivalent company, are we there yet?
Future production of gold is quite the prize, no?
Looking thru the auspectroscope


IronHead (6/22/01; 12:33:43MT - usagold.com msg#: 56652)
Peter Asher; Anyone? - Sir Peter's HOF post
Sir Peter - I've lost your excellent/recent HOF nominated post, and would like to review it intoto with respect to the current debate. The post number, or possibly a repost, please? It doesn't seem to come up from the HOF archives on my computer.

Thanks,
IronHead


sector (6/22/01; 12:31:42MT - usagold.com msg#: 56651)
Speaking of International Trade...
Computer chip demand to dive; sales projected to be worst since 1985

By Bloomberg News

PARIS - Demand for personal-computer chips will fall 55 percent this year as the market heads for its worst collapse since 1985, according to a market researcher.

Dataquest, a unit of Gartner, expects DRAM sales to fall to $14 billion this year from $31.5 billion in 2000. DRAM, or dynamic random access memory, are chips used in personal computers.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/134309376_chipcrash22.html

**********************************

The fools keep buying Dell, MSFT, IBM...
It will all come d-o-w-n ! Banks dragged down with the swaggering techies...and the Master of the Universe all too well knows it.


Randy (@ The Tower) (6/22/01; 12:21:16MT - usagold.com msg#: 56650)
Concise recap of yesterday's U.S. International Trade Report (msg#: 56558)
After accounting for gold imports, the United States was a net gold exporter for the month of April. According to data from the Department of Commerce released yesterday, a net 60 tonnes of gold was transferred from U.S. ownership in April to be received by international interests. (In March, this net outflow of gold was 54 tonnes.)

To put these numbers in perspective, the our miners extract only about 30 tonnes of gold each month from American soil.

For additional perspective, consider this. Our monthly trade deficits in goods and services have been consistently so massive, that to balance the deficit of April alone (at $32.2 billion) through the use of gold would have required an additional transfer of ownership of 3,780 tonnes of gold for that single month. But instead, we send dollars which were probably largely sent back to New York for bonds in return. How much longer will this privilege remain?

I suggest you get (gold) while the getting's good.


Belgian (6/22/01; 11:39:38MT - usagold.com msg#: 56649)
@ Auspec
B.Godsell : was certain the gold industry consolidation (mergers and acquisitions) would gain momentum, partly owing to the "relentless low level of POG".
Consolidation will create companies that produce what the world needs (in terms of Gold supply) rather than what it can take ! (me: touching isn't it ?) !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Au to increase its market value or size as well as increasing its liquidity. The day of the loyal shareholder is over ! (me : well, well, well...oh dear).

Au to merge with Barrick or a joint take over ? ( cfr. Gold Fields attempt). And why not taking the expanded F.N. ?
Whatever they are up to. Au wants regain control and dominance as I stated already long ago. It is in their very nature to do so. And as you said...the benefittor is "GOLD".
The 2 million ounces (underground) that Au sold (will sell) are in the good hands of compatriot Harmony who will join the "control" directives.

Au doesn't want to cartelize the fragmented gold producers.
They just want to DEBeers it. The winner takes it all !
As to the hedging questions. What do we know about the magical tricks that are hidden in the books or off the books ? The major handicap of Ashanti is the govnmt's participation in it. (cfr. Zambia's copper and Anglo American). It is a cruel world outside.


Clint H (6/22/01; 11:36:15MT - usagold.com msg#: 56648)
Sierra Madre msg#: 56642

<<Out of sight of land, nothing but salt water all around, with the THEORETICAL objective of reaching Cathay, the fabulous East, and lands loaded with riches.>>

A gold coin in hand is something to hold on to while we are out of site of land.


Peter Asher (6/22/01; 11:21:48MT - usagold.com msg#: 56647)
Rules of Engagement!

I would like to nominate the following construct derived from ORO (6/22/01; 03:06:46MT - msg#: 56626) into the posting 'Guidelines'.

<<<< When disagreeing with another poster, if you think XXXX, describe how that is so. Show what the chain of causation is from X to X',X'' etc. >>>>


Mr Gresham (6/22/01; 11:09:14MT - usagold.com msg#: 56646)
Oro, FOA
Thanks for hanging in there. I'm watching two chess masters at the peak of their game, and now I lack the greatest wealth of all -- time! -- to adequately follow your words and reasonings.

You have also shown remarkable patience with our sometimes dim understandings of your presentations. IMO, you each would likely surpass a top-level graduate school teacher in economics.

At times like this, I feel like I'm sailing a very small boat in very high wind. One minute, exhilaration; next minute, I'm underwater...

Sierra Madre has given the Columbus analogy perfectly for us, and as Lafisrap (I believe it was) said, the Market will someday make us all geniuses (and then we can argue about how THAT happened) or leave us all fools floating in our rowboat together.

There's plenty of room for humility in all that, and only RESPECT amongst us can keep our little boat moving forward, humble as it may be. If we lose that, then much of our work is torn out and tossed away in a moment's carelessness...


JMB (6/22/01; 10:57:38MT - usagold.com msg#: 56645)
The debate continues as the excitement builds in the paper market.
While gold is jumping around, the Dollar Index appears to be dropping down out of a dual widget formation or whatever. Is this the BIG weekend?

ORO (6/22/01; 10:39:48MT - usagold.com msg#: 56644)
Now online, a marvelous book from Rothbard
http://www.mises.org/money.asp
For a quick and easy read on money and monetary history, this one has no equal.



Stocks, Lies, and Ticker Tape (6/22/01; 10:27:19MT - usagold.com msg#: 56643)
Sierra Madre
Of Columbus and Gold bugs
Great analogy!

Sierra Madre (6/22/01; 10:19:25MT - usagold.com msg#: 56642)
Causes of bickering...
It seems to me that lately, discussion has become rather acerbic and some are getting hot under the collar. What's up?

I think of Christopher Columbus and his crew, sailing West in 1492. Out of sight of land, nothing but salt water all around, with the THEORETICAL objective of reaching Cathay, the fabulous East, and lands loaded with riches.

A problem for Columbus was to repress the grumblers who wanted to turn back, because they feared they might come to the end of the world, and fall off.

Here we are, the goldbugs, a tiny minority, sailing across a vast ocean of paper, perhaps limitless. Day after day, year after year, no land in sight!

Is it any wonder there is impatience, grumbling, bad humor and even fights breaking out? All because of a THEORETICAL objective, the land where gold "goes to the moon". We have nothing but theory to guide us. Present experience screams we are wrong. But still, we sail to the golden land.

And the final irony: Columbus didn't reach the East; he reached a New World, and he didn't even come to understand that that was what he had done.

We're sailing East. We hope to reach a fabulous land of immeasureable wealth for all. And when we get there, will it really be that land? Or maybe some place we didn't know we were going to find?

Have a peaceful weekend!

Sierra


ge (6/22/01; 10:02:51MT - usagold.com msg#: 56641)
ORO
You are the sure winner of the debate. The only way out left for your opponent, is to make you angry, using any available tool (including misquotations). As the Journeyman says, keep cool.

There are only two sets of arguments that paper money advocates use:
-US did so.
-That is what the modern society wants.

And they repeat, and repeat, and repeat these until, they hope, you get bored and stop responding. I would be very surprised if you persuaded a fiat money supporter to talk about the relation between the business cycle and money/credit creation.

Best regards,


miner49er (6/22/01; 09:58:02MT - usagold.com msg#: 56640)
Interest Rate Wars...
From MarketNews International 6/21/01:

Duisenberg: ECB Rates Appropriate; Remain Vigilant On Inflation Jun 21 / 10:02 EDT

By Christian Distasio

DUBLIN (MktNews) - The European Central Bank's current interest rate levels remain "appropriate" for the achievement of eurozone price stability in the medium term, and the ECB continues to be "vigilant" on inflationary pressures, ECB President Wim Duisenberg said Thursday.

Duisenberg also denied that current interest rates are restrictive or hampering eurozone economic growth, which he said the ECB still expects to be "broadly in line" with trend potential this year and next. A recession is not expected in Europe, he said.

The comments appear to reinforce a growing impression that while the ECB may cut rates again in the coming months as inflationary pressures recede and the economy weakens further, such a move could come at later point than the markets have been expecting.

"Against the background of available information, the current level of ECB key interest rates remains appropriate to ensure that the euro area economy will be able to maintain price stability in the medium term," Duisenberg said in his opening statement at the ECB's latest press conference, held this time in Dublin.

"Sometimes you reach a point where the monetary stance you have achieved is appropriate for the inflation prospects over the medium term," he later said in response to a reporter's question and in reference to the ECB's recent rate cut on May 10.

Asked later whether he would describe the ECB's current policy stance as 'wait and see,' Duisenberg repeated that "I would describe it as appropriate."

---- end snippit ----

(ref. beginning of my post #56584 yesterday)

Seems that the FED, while receiving tremendous pressure to ratchet rates down again 50 basis points from our market power-players, is trapped with very clear indications from the ECB that they will keep rates where they are for now.

Can't not please the kids in the playpen on Wall Street, but the divergence continues 'tween the Euro/USD. Maybe soon, a Dollar->Euro carry trade develops? Not a very restful weekend ahead for Mr. AG...

One thing easing lease rates in AU do, if they stay low, is provide wiggle room in the AU->Dollar carry. A drop of nearly 50 bp in rates, at least at the short end, takes some of the bite out of the decreasing spread when Greenspan lowers again.



USAGOLD (6/22/01; 09:32:31MT - usagold.com msg#: 56639)
Today's and Other Reports.. . . . .
http://www.usagold.com/Order_Form.html
Note: If the type of analysis you read below interests you, you might have an interest in our Daily Commentaries and hard copy monthly newsletter which are available by a one time, easy to do registration at the link above. Running late today. . ..Thanks MK

6/22/01 (www.usagold.com). . . . . . . . Gold continued to rally quietly this morning as we moved one more day into the first sultry week of the summer doldrums period -- a perennial event usually two weeks to a month in length characterized by reduced international volumes but given at times to fairly significant price swings. Sometimes while Europe is at the beach and America is on the highways, the gold market suddenly and inexplicably rallies. Those in the acquisition mode might be well-advised to keep one eye on the markets while the other happily concentrates on that little white ball or bobber.

Friend of the firm, Jeffrey Christian at the CPM Group (no relation) buttresses that view this morning with his observation that the $250 to $290 trading range of the past two years represents an "unsustainable low." Canaccord Capital's Rhona O'Connell provides some behind the scenes conjecture saying "Although it looks as if some near-term shorts have been rolled forward. Lease rates have eased, which would point either to an increase in liquidity or the unwinding of short positions - be they mine hedges or speculative. If the former, then this would tend to confirm rumors in the market last week of hedge lifting." You can bet such analysis is not lost on the gold accumulator.
Please note above this morning's emphasis on monitoring the markets. We are keeping an eye on the U.S. interest rate situation which will become clearer at next week's Fed meeting. The consensus opinion is that rates are going lower yet again with tall the implications that will have on the gold carry trade (outlined below). In Europe indicators point to fears of recession. According to reports out of Europe, recession fears are taking root among the populace with Germany reporting business confidence at a two year low. This prompts many to think that the European Central Bank might cut rates as well. The net affect of this interest rate dance (accompanied with the precision of a Bach minuet)will be to depreciate both currencies against goods and services, and keep the dollar theoretically (and for all appearances) strong against the euro. In reality, residents on both sides of the Atlantic are losing the battle against the cost of living and this will end up further enhancing gold demand as the investor in both economies looks to protect his or her assets against the ravages of inflation.

We are also watching the situation in South America where Brazil has defaulted on $1.8 billion payment to the International Monetary Fund and the devaluation of the Argentina peso. Quite often devaluations and loan defaults go hand in hand in South America. These maladies transform quickly to the crisis mode which in turn spills over to Wall Street where the stocks of the international banks affected by this sort of thing are traded on a daily basis. Brazil is seeking more money from the IMF and it won't be long until Argentina finds itself in similar straights. After years of trying to maintain a peg against the dollar, it appears that Argentina may be in for a weaker currency, inflation, bank runs, loan defaults and economic stagnation. In other words, Argentina may resurrect fears of the Asian contagion in places where American banks have significant exposure. That came back to the United States in various forms in the late 1990s during the last contagion -- most notably the Russian defaults which took down Long Term Capital Management and nearly precipitated a stock market crash. This financial storm forming up in South America as you read this Commentary may carry similar implications.

With that perspective in place, we would like to wish all a restful weekend. We'll leave up last week's summation for our new readers. That's it for now. MK
Commentary (6/14/01)

Two large groups in the gold market which have benefited from the "old" gold market will have to change their thinking with reference to the "new", if in fact this trend to normalcy holds:
1. the shorts (and all those associated with them)
2. the accumulators

With respect to the first group, covering might be the order of the day, though it will not be an easy process (once again we direct you to the analysis below). There are hints, for example, that Barrick might be challenging its long addiction to fast and easy gold loans. As a matter of fact, the strong buying we are seeing on recent gold dips could very well be a major mining company, or companies, covering.
With respect to the second group -- the accumulators -- a change of thinking might be in order. Cheap gold (gifted the market by the manipulators) could quickly become a thing of the past. All good things, as the saying goes, must end. In real gold market rallies, the price moves quickly and waiting it out for that right price often becomes a frustrating enterprise. So a change in psychology and tactics might be in order.

Some trends accruing positively to gold in the early summer of 2001 deserve to be briefly restated:

1. The unwinding carry trade: Much has been said about this already here. Gold lending rates remain historically high (in the 2% range) and Treasury yields continue to trend lower squeezing the profit out this arbitrage arrangement which has hurt gold and boosted the dollar.

2. Equity market weakness: A global development characterized by price stagnation and in some sectors rapid depreciation. The investor is encouraged to diversify out of paper and into alternatives. Gold looks like the best buy among primary assets.

3. Inflation: Pushed by rising energy, this isn't going away. Even if the government fiddles with the CPI and PPI like it did during the Clinton administration, it won't erase the hard reality of inflation at the gas pump and the supermarket.

4. Real Rate of Return: You do not have to be Robert Mundell (a recent Nobel Prize Laureate in Economics) to understand that if inflation is 4% and rising and the return on your certified deposit is 4% and declining that you are losing money on your savings by the time you pay the tax man. Inflation is a wealth tax and if you just sit back and let it erode your asset base, you will find yourself poorer by the day.

5. Systemic Risk: This remains the overarching concern for the average investor. Overexposed in leveraged derivative positions, third world and technology-based debt (just to mention a few hot spots), the financial system exists today by the grace of God and easy money. It wouldn't take much to throw this fragile and tenuous system into chaos. The frequency of incidents seems to be accelerating and the size of the problems once exposed seems to be growing. This is not the sort of trend that inspires confidence in the financial system. Most serious analysts worry that there are more LTCM's (Long Term Capital Management is the leveraged hedge fund that almost brought down Wall Street a few years back.) out there and that any one of them could surface at any time without notice and be enough to throw the system into turmoil.

All of the above speak to the inclusion of gold in your portfolio if you are goldless or moving quickly to attain the level of ownership you deem appropriate if you've already begun an accumulation program. Every once in awhile I think it useful to check our premises and the checklist above briefly covers the high points. If I were to sum up today's message it would be that the developing trends haven't changed much with respect to the economy and the investor, but the nature of the gold market has changed significantly over the last few months. I wouldn't be surprised to see the price of you portfolio insurance rising, and perhaps rising significantly in the weeks and months ahead.

I will be away for a few days and may or may not write depending upon events. MK

----------------------

Commentary 6/11/01. . . . . . . . Gold is giving back a good portion of its Friday gain in early New York trading. Friday's over $7 run-up began in a quiet, thin market when funds hit bullion trading desks with large physical orders. If the reports are correct, that would indicate that some major buyer may have been in the market to cover a gold loan(s) vis a vis the gold carry trade -- a potentiality we have warned of on several occasions in this report.

The strength and suddenness of the move on Friday is further indication that this is not "normal" market action, or the will of the market masses. What Friday represented was the will of one player or a small group of players. Similarly, Reuters blames "bullion firms" for the sell-off this morning. This fits the pattern, i.e., someone short the market covers with a stealth purchase when things are quiet. Then the bullion banks make sure that added public interest doesn't allow the rally to build any steam, because if it does covering the rest of the loans in their portfolio might quickly become problematic, if not impossible. The worst outcome for the bullion banks and their gold loan portfolio would be a protracted gold bullion bull market, so rallies must be squelched with impunity, until they can be squelched no more -- a day we believe is coming.

In this era of mega-funds and huge trading organizations where capital has been pooled and concentrated to such a degree it can move markets (whether those deploying it want it to or not), the small commodity investor doesn't have a chance. Not unless getting churned, whipsawed and separated from your capital are experiences you relish. We are witnessing in gold the same circumstances that have caused several stock mutual fund trades to bow out of the investment business. Their positions were so large that they couldn't move in the market without causing either major breakouts or major breakdowns. With the extreme leverage factor of derivatives added in, that pooling effect and market-mover conundrum has been greatly magnified. Who knows where it all ends, let's just say I wouldn't want to be in the gold shorts shoes. We have some simple advice: Buy physical, not paper. Better to own the metal outright and sit back and watch this battle between the longs and shorts play itself out, then get ground up as a weak participant. The traders will do what they have to do. You should do the same.

As we have said on numerous occasions, the purpose for the Washington Agreement was to rein-in gold lending practices at the level of the "commercial" banks all over the world. That policy was given teeth when long term loans were called in at the end 1999 with the most visible result being a quick rise in gold lease rates and retrenchment at higher levels. In practice, the ;policy is beginning to have its effect. A quick glance at the gold chart beginning in 1999 and ending last Friday tells you very quickly and convincingly that we are in a different market now than we have been since the early 1990s, particularly when you take into consideration that last week's return to the $275 mark isn't shown here. What the chart is telling us is that gold is slowly being let out of the cage and the carry trade is being quietly settled. This is a freer market today that has been in the recent past and it will be a freer market in the months to come if our analysis holds any water (and we think it does).

In the end, the bullion banks will come to a loan loss level that they feel can be absorbed. Then they will deftly move out of the way of gold, the way the London Gold Pool did in 1971. When that becomes evident, the bull market for gold will begin in earnest. MK

Note: Due to the importance of today's report, I will leave it up for a few days. Next report Wednesday or later. Thank you.


Gandalf the White (6/22/01; 08:53:06MT - usagold.com msg#: 56638)
SPOT is "awaking" again !
Don't look now, but SPOT is getting ready to JUMP after 12:00 NY time. JUMP SPOT, JUMP !!!
<;-)


auspec (06/22/01; 07:42:58MT - usagold.com msg#: 56637)
Hedging Accord?
"....an announcement of a hedging accord between Anglo and Barrick is imminent."
Can't for the life of me figure out what these two 'mining enterprises' have in common {smirk}. Looks like a white flag faintly flying in the distance though. One thing is for certain, this is not an announcement of increased hedging. Any speculation out there in regards to what BarAnglo might be up to? Figuring a way to both survive this hedghog meltdown?
In regards to US Banks heavily buying calls, how many will be available and sold by whom? Someone else going to take on this full responsibility? Never! Just doing what they can, in as many angles as possible, to survive.
Stay tuned


Stocks, Lies, and Ticker Tape (06/22/01; 07:24:54MT - usagold.com msg#: 56636)
Turnaround
Thanks for the background information and your insight. I am in complete agreement as to CPMs prerogative in acceding to the Petition, and OROs for acceptance.

I enjoy and appreciate the debate! This debate in various forms has been around the forum for a while. ET and Randy come to mind. The posts of Peter Asher, ET, Journeyman, and others regarding the need for gold as money exclusively, rings true to me. The last 10 days os so debate between TG/FOA and ORO has been IMHO tremendous!

The Petition was offered with a knock at the Tower gate. No battering ram or catapults have been employed by yours truly. And to the Towers credit, boiling oil has not been used in reponse.



auspec (06/22/01; 07:15:50MT - usagold.com msg#: 56635)
Cafe Snippet
Subject: GOLD ALERT
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 07:19:37 -0500
Reply Reply All Forward Delete Previous Next Close


Le Metropole Members,

From The Cafe's John Brimelow:

The various Mitsui conduits are putting out the
story today that an announcement of a hedging accord
between Anglo and Barrick is imminent. The story of
Godsell moving to Canada denied yesterday, and the
recovery in gold is attributed to this.

UBS Warbug remarks that there has been heavy call buying
by (to) US Banks which might break gold out of its range
in the near future.

http://www.thebulliondesk.com/downloads/ubs/ubs.pdf

A day to stay alert! I am going to a 3rd grade play.

J

This fits in with the information being sent your way
way in Midas commentary - will get into that later.




<A HREF="http://www.LeMetropoleCafe.com/entrance.cfm"> Le Metropole Cafe</A>

All the best,

Bill Murphy
Le Patron
www.LeMetropoleCafe.com

Comment: Can they get out of this mess by merely buying calls?? Of course not, but it can help some along with the other methods of extrication. Favorite is >POG!




dragonfly (06/22/01; 06:49:22MT - usagold.com msg#: 56634)
miner49er @msg#56584
Hey miner49er - Great Post !!! It's my 'print it out and pass it around to the guys' post of the week. Some keen insights like <<< "One might say, socialism is already discounted by the system." >>> and <<< "...and (we) may still be reaping the harvest of a more prudently sown past.">>>

You have made the consequences of US monetary profligacy accessible to those of us who cannot follow the technical dissertations. A very well reasoned and CLEAR post.

Thanks.


Turnaround (6/22/01; 05:51:11MT - usagold.com msg#: 56633)
ORO section

Stocks, Lies, and Ticker Tape (6/20/01; 06:15:16MT - usagold.com msg#: 56485)
ORO @ #56455 Humanity's interactions: volition and violence, and Petition to Tower

"In post #56391 I presented a petition to the Tower requesting your being granted a "platform equivalent to the "Gold Trail"". I find your posts extremely valuable for seeing through the smoke constantly laid down by those who profit from the status quo. As Leigh pointed out, and I certainly agree, due to the length of your posts, it would be easier to follow your work removed from the gold discussion forum. From the responses received thus far regarding your debate with TG/FOA, it is clear there are many people in your corner. However my not knowing your opinion towards this, if offered such a platform, would you accept it?"

ORO mentioned a long time ago the purpose of his posting was to a) put the mechanics to the Another/FOA scenario (which is now appearing in rather stark clarity) and b) garner commentary to help hone his theories and scenarios. He has shown little interest in having his past posts immortalized for all time, but has occasionally directed the reader to "the archives" for further information. He may prefer it this way, as the work has been indicated to be ultimately for commercial purposes, such as a book. There was a discussion a few months ago on implementing a general search engine; this does not appear to be currently feasible. Maybe if we all joined hands we could sift through and pick out the ‘best of’.

In my perspective, ORO's work and online contributions are the most remarkable and far-ranging I've studied this side of von Mises, but this is of course only because I am a semi-literate, ignorant dolt. Some of it is so terse and condensed it slips right by, back into the bitstream. Perhaps his dream is to reduce the description of the entire Universe to a single sentence ending with "..., ergo."

There are quite a few ORO posts buried back there that opened eyes and worlds to many of us, providing a quite different way of looking through the glass. Several appeared to be original, world-class contributions to the field of economics itself. I would agree that a section similar to Trail Guide's would be quite apropos, but this is the proprietor's decision firstly and would require ORO's consent to boot.


Netking (6/22/01; 05:42:44MT - usagold.com msg#: 56632)
ORO - Gold/Silver
ORO Re you comment(56544): ". . . Silver, and Plat, Plad, and Rhodi, would be much more stable as they rise to match general price levels and would increasingly obtain a transfer of monetary premium from an inflated gold price and an over-printed currency. . . "
------------------------------------------------------------
Netking replies > Your assumption and inference herewith is that gold alone will reflect this overheated premium, initially.

I believe this may warrant another think, learned ORO. Silver as you know is at close to a 5,000 year inflation adjusted low price & has a unique market dynamics model, right now.

Silver has in place extreme market supression characteristics to an "extent" like no other market in ANY time frame we have evidenced or have record of.

The shortage of physical silver will be so fundamentally pronounced and acute in the days ahead that recovery to a "normal market" in terms of dynamics & pricing will not happen quickly.

Silver will be the one I suggest that will reflect a hyper-premium of the previously known historical pricing equilibrium.

When the silver leasing stops, and when the silver shorts unwind. . . . raw, aggressive and unrestrained power will be unleashed on the laws of demand and supply . . . and this will be reflected to you and I by the price buyers are prepared for our physical silver, comment ORO?
regards Netking
-----------------------------------------------------------
I have learned so much over the last few years from this forum.(I started lurking here years ago to read FOA's posts!). More power to MK & CPM(and staff)for making it possible. During this time I have had an impartation of knowledge or a perspective of looking at the issues given to me from every poster(without exception)that has sometimes challenged my own strongly held viewpoints or knowledge base. . . and this is one of it's truly golden qualities for us all.


Stocks, Lies, and Ticker Tape (6/22/01; 05:16:38MT - usagold.com msg#: 56631)
Journeyman
On the "Rope a Dope"
If one employs the "Rope a Dope" as a strategy, they have to be able to land the knockout blow in order to prevail.

SteveH (6/22/01; 04:33:58MT - usagold.com msg#: 56630)
repost
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20010621/pl/markets_dollar_dc_1.html
Date: Fri Jun 22 2001 02:21
offal (Strong dollar? Greenie and O'neill scratching their heads -) ID#242184:
Copyright © 2000 offal/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved
Well hold on a minute!! let me make sure my Pension is
indexed to inflation first, hohoho


LONDON ( Reuters ) - The head of a U.S. industry group called on the U.S. government to abandon its strong dollar policy, the Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday.

International Paper Co. chief executive John T. Dillon, head of Business Roundtable, put his case at a private meeting with U.S. Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill on Wednesday, the newspaper said in its European edition.






Hi-Hat (6/22/01; 04:15:54MT - usagold.com msg#: 56629)
State of the Statists
Statists wait for direction, resolutions, and their
continued sustenance from, "on high". Always you give;
we take.

Mouths uplifted in supplication to the cinematic, collective
tit.

Only to find in a horrible end, That, the TRUTH
is not entertainment.


Randy (@ The Tower) (6/22/01; 03:41:27MT - usagold.com msg#: 56628)
ORO
---"There is an exasperation of sorts in seeing one's words quoted, and seeing the response implying that the statements quoted mean something oddly outside any meaning intended or deemed perceivable in the sentences."---

Very well expressed! I can completely relate to this item as it happens to me all the time. Only recently did it dawn on me that this might be an innocent yet unavoidable feature of this particular form of interaction. Either that, or everyone is out to get me, yourself included!! <ha ha!!>

Somewhere around here there awaits a hammock with my name on it...


Randy (@ The Tower) (6/22/01; 03:29:39MT - usagold.com msg#: 56627)
Lafisrap: "...I believe those posts did not appear in the Hall of Fame. Randy, correct?"
http://www.usagold.com/halloffame.html
I cannot say "correct" or "incorrect" because only you can know what you believe or not. But from the looks of it, I would say "Correct. You DO apparently believe they did not appear in the HOF."

And with regard to that belief, your belief would be completely without merit, wrong, and unjustified other than as the product of an ill-informed opinion formed apparently without research. Have I made myself clear without mincing words?

Sure, each post may not have been entered over night. It may have taken up to a month to process it through The Tower. But each and every fully nominated ORO post has long since been coded into the Hall. Have you checked the index??? There is more than one page of content I hope you know.

<sigh> Maybe one of these sessions I'll be able to discuss gold again and address several outstanding items directed my way -- instead of this time and toil to maintain an atmosphere of decorum in the face of petty bickerings taking root at the Forum.


ORO (6/22/01; 03:06:46MT - usagold.com msg#: 56626)
Journeyman, Randy - the verbatim mis-quote
The critiques I did not post were not intended as personal attacks, but there is only so much criticism of factual presentation, economic argument, and discussion of manners of presentation and reasoning that could be put forward without them becoming such attacks, even if no harm is intended to the other side's online persona, just "harm" to his arguments.

There is an exasperation of sorts in seeing one's words quoted, and seeing the response implying that the statements quoted mean something oddly outside any meaning intended or deemed perceivable in the sentences.



Finally, for Camel
Why don't YOU discredit capitalism by reasoned argument rather than just claim that somebody did so in the enchanted past. Furthermore, libertarian ideology of a debater does not discredit an argument posited. If you dislike the arguments, think they are false, then put forth a counter argument and display an opinion.
If your mother ever told you that classic "if your friends jumped off a cliff to their deaths would you do so because 'everyone is doing it'?" She was right. Popular opinion as expressed in a vote or a poll is not a substitute for having an opinion and making a reasoned argument in its favor.
You might remember that the "democratic" revolution of the period just before and after WWI saw the enaction of "Jim Crow" law in the south by popular demand, "temperance" in the whole country, and the passage of myrriad laws, regulations and ordnances meant to harm an unfavored minority.

If you think all ills from slavery to cholesterol arise from capitalism, describe how that is so. Show what the chain of causation is from the "capitalist" principles or from features of the "capitalist system". Or perhaps a reasoned argument is a form of "Libertarian ideology", perhaps logic is too much of a "Western cauvinist capitalist" method of argumentation? Perhaps it is not "green" enough for you because spotted owls can't do it, and we must have a "level playing field"?



Lafisrap (6/22/01; 02:31:53MT - usagold.com msg#: 56625)
SLATT
SLATT asked: Was there ever an election for the "Gold Trail"? Or was it by decree?

Me: The answer here can, of course, be spun several ways. The plain truth is that the Gold Trail was erected after one of FOA's upsets as a consequence of the discussion here on this forum. The Gold Trail was the result of just one part of the ongoing drama surrounding FOA/Another and was intended to help insulate him from the unpleasantries that can occur in open debate. FOA had essentially thrown a fit and stomped off, threatening never to return (not the first time), thus, the Gold Trail.

To verify my description, as Randy is so fond of saying: "check the archives."

On a related subject, material included in the Hall of Fame is by decree (Randy's). If a specific post is nominated and
shown to have the required support, it may or may not be entered into the Hall of Fame. It depends on what the powers that be decide. I know because I nominated one or more of Oro's posts, gathered the ample evidence of support, submitted in email to Randy the nomination and the required seconds, thirds, etc., but I believe those posts did not appear in the Hall of Fame. Randy, correct?

About things that matter: POG is still pathetic. Farfel's last message here to this forum spoke of U.S. military power and the likelihood that the U.S. dollar would remain strong until a time at which the U.S. military is no longer dominate. Yes, think about it. Force or threat of force, what does history tell us? How has force or threat of force been a part of the world economy in the past? How has it been a part of the transfer of gold? I remember something about the the new world, the spaniards, and gold. And just how was it that the english acquired all that gold? Not from gold mines on that little island, was it?

Until the POG explodes, we can all be somewhat more accurately described as deluded than as clear thinking and forward looking. If/when it explodes, well, we are geniuses, of course.

Lafisrap


ORO (6/22/01; 02:13:01MT - usagold.com msg#: 56624)
Goldfan, less to worry about future gold prices
The early post on the "gold bubble" scenario is what I am trying to get FOA and Another to confirm or deny. I think it is coming to some 2 years soon since I first broached the subject and it had garnered responses at the time along the lines of "things are still in flux", "nothing is set in stone" and the like. The confluence of political motives FOA puts forward, those he seems to avoid, and points that FOA touched on in his presentations as to the thinking on the ECB side and the Oil side seem to indicate some intent towards a "gold bubble".

Another's early message included an explicit message to the effect that when "someone important" is buying gold, its price is maintained artificially low, and when the time is right to sell, the price is artificially high. FOA calls the presumed "gold bubble" price the "world class wealth asset" value. The presumed purpose being to justify and warn of an upcoming intended market manipulation by the ECB in order to placate a gold favoring and gold holding party, Arab oil. The latter would support the currency of the Central Bank that does this for them with denomination of the oil trade. The alternative being settlement of oil trade in gold, or the purchase of gold by Arab oil with any (net) currency payments they get, as per Another's original proposal.

So far, however, the opportune moment to "strike" has not come. I suppose the "US side" is still coming up with gold reserves with which to displace gold deposits from both CBs and private holdings at bullion banks, which keep the gold price down (meaning that this gold keeps the paper gold at par, thus maintaining the paper's ability to dictate price). Thus the US side might be retaining My recent study of reserve growth shows a 4.7% annualized growth since 1995, up from near no growth from 1985 up to that time. Of course, gold companies may publish suspect data, but that is very unlikely since it only affects share values on the margin and opens up the risk for lawsuits, and the data is audited.

In the case of the "gold bubble" scenario, there is nothing to worry about as to the gold price being low. It would definitely not be that. But then, I can't get a direct answer on that.

Another proposed that the new, "better", gold reserve system would be such that allows currency to be supplied into a contracting fiat debt market by supplying the currency through increasing reserves.
That was in contrast to traditional gold reserve systems that forced the central bank to let out its gold reserve into the market. Thus a loss of confidence in a fiat fractional gold reserve money would bring about a loss of reserves as currency accounts were liquidated into gold. Thus creating the very same weakness in the system that the public feared.
The problem remaining in the system that Another proposed is (1) discounting of the currency against gold because the gold can't be accessed, thus the currency can continue to devalue in real purchasing power even as gold backing increases. (2) If it is understood by substantial market players that the system would pick up gold in this way, they would rather hold gold, and would drop the use of the currency. (3) Because this approach has the monetary authority attempting to change the gold price upwards relative to real goods and productive assets, these would have to be released from within the central banks' country (region). Which at the time of a credit deflation would mean that assets would be lost in cyclycal downturns, when they are at their cheapest. (4) To the extent that gold assets are outside the central banks' country, they would exert a pull towards exports as the currency value falls while it is printed, and thus impoverishes the people of the country. (5) It retains all of the problems of central bank's inducing economic error by obfuscation of market information on short term interest rates and "money supply". (6) to the extent that gold assets are within the monetary authority's region, they would exert a pull inwards on imports and follow classical bubble dynamics. (7) Whether enforceable or not, a gold collaterlized debt would still be most attractive way to capture capital gains out of its appreciation, which would cause a barrage of excess currency as short gold-inflating currency - long gold would be the trade of a lifetime, and lenders galore would take it, provided they can keep the gold collateral in hand.


The argument of gold prices falling if not used in contract transactions and in does not apply in this "gold bubble" scenario, where prices are pushed up artificially.


LeSin (6/22/01; 02:09:50MT - usagold.com msg#: 56623)
THE GREAT DEBATE
TG/FOA & ORO - THANK YOU - Both For Your "THOUGHTS"

Thanks also to All the contributors to this great forum.

A Special "Thank You" to Randy & MK -- <(;-))

"S"

Apologies for my numerous errors - to many mistakes - I'll proof the next one. "S"








Randy (@ The Tower) (6/22/01; 01:53:10MT - usagold.com msg#: 56622)
I received this today by e-mail from an eloquent visitor to our site. An excellent perspective builder.
Dear sirs,

I have been an avid lurker on your site for over a year. Over that time I have considered myself very fortunate to have read and learned from such a courteous and knowledgeable group of posters.Despite my comparatively shallow knowledge of economics, I have found no other place where my expectations for intellectual stimulus on matters gold and economics have been fulfilled so satisfyingly. I will emphasize here and now that my respect applies equally to all who contribute, not just those who perhaps by virtue of knowledge, experience, intellect, commitment to cause, or even perhaps they just have more time to post, post here more often or at greater length. A discussion group is nothing without the ebb and flow of differing opinion. In that regard you have created an environment in which this flourishes. Higher understanding on any issue challenges and uplifts not only the individual, but also ultimately society as a whole.

Your discussion site is unique in that it has provided an outlet for the writings of contributors posting under the identities of Another, F.O.A., and Trail Guide. These people, and we do not know how many they are, have consistently provided perspectives, opinion, information and discussion with patience, politeness, evident worldly knowledge and experience, humor and in my humble opinion, most importantly,have done so with great respect for the questioning, and also dissenting opinions of other posters. By this last point I mean that they have given much time to respond to the probing questions raised by others, and have elaborated ,I believe, with sincerity to points on which they have been challenged.

Does this mean that because I have so much respect for the writings and the presentation of these people known as Another, F.O.A., and Trail Guide , that I follow their writings in the same way that a devout Christian would literally follow the writings of the new testament? Of course not. Neither do I believe that these fine people intend to have their presentation read or followed in that way. Contrary to what some may believe, I do not believe they are looking for disciples, rather they are presenting scenarios of unfolding events in a manner which challenges our normal expectations . They have offered us a new way of looking into a global economy , one which is deeply clouded by the politics of this world. My own previously rather simplistic view of the workings of the gold trade, the oil trade and even the stock market have been profoundly changed by the writings of these people.However as my mind is constantly exposed to the thoughts, opinions and the logic expressed by A., F.O.A., and T.G., I do not simply substitute them for my previous understandings and self developed conclusions. They are a welcome new contribution and challenge to the never ending search for understanding which thankfully all humans possess.

Just as I have been so interested and stimulated by A. FOA. and T.G., I must also mention the contributions of O.R.O. This contributor has a thirst for knowledge that is truly inspiring. He also , and I must admit I rely mostly on the posts of other people to confirm this , has an intellect to match. I am in awe of this man. He is so well, organized both in his access to information and in his presentation. I could probably spend weeks on end reviewing his arguments and still not fully absorb the mass of information and logic he presents. But absolutely the very crowning glory from my point of view is that he has substantial differences of opinion with your other major posters. What more could anyone in search of knowledge, like myself, ask for?

Why am I writing this E. Mail you may ask? It is because in the past few days I have become concerned that the writings of A. FOA., and T.G. and ORO are becoming the catalysts for a coalescing of opinion on the forum into two separate and distinct camps. OROs post of 56545 caused me quite a shock. and somewhat of a disappointment.

Despite OROs warning in that post I do not believe that it really portents personal attacks, and I will be the first to say that if it does then it has absolutely no place here. However , the fact that the two emerging camps of thought , or support, here seem to be growing somewhat more antagonistic troubles me greatly. It has not been typical of past months of posting and I really do not understand why it is happening. Perhaps it is because of Spring and testosterone levels are up. Perhaps it is because of the great wealth of knowledge that ALL posters to the Forum have contributed in the past that people have now so much more knowledge that they feel capable of establishing well defined positions and opinions in their own minds in a way that they previously dare not.

To these people I respectfully say: do not see the world in black and white terms. Only the Creator knows the truth and He is not sitting on the FRB. Keep an open mind and acknowledge that learning will never end, that your own expectations and conclusions will constantly change. The greatest disappointment that I could envisage would be that suddenly all posters would see the world the same way, and Randy would be able to close down the Forum because these great posters had foreseen the future and their work is ended.

In conclusion, please keep educating me. I need the intellectual stimulus. Do not let the challenge to ideas and thought stop, but let it not degenerate into a ' them and us' kind of confrontation.It may seem selfish and impertinent of me to suggest but I personally would appreciate a prolonged discussion of the similarities between any opposing poster's points of view than a focus immediately on the differences that separate them. I believe that this always leads to a more civil and intellectual debate. Perhaps if the dialogue is tempered and sympathetic to my level of knowledge I could be persuaded to participate.

I believe that I am an unbiased onlooker. I am not a good writer as most of your posters are. But if my E. Mail touches a sensitive nerve then perhaps you may use my concerns to indicate on the forum that something is changed and possibly not for the better. Believe me , if any of your great posters were to leave then we would all be the worse for it . Please use my post in any way if it may be helpful.

Sincerely,
[Name Withheld]


LeSin (6/22/01; 01:52:56MT - usagold.com msg#: 56621)
"Political Will" @ Economic Change & Convergence
Communism & Capitalism - BOTH FAILED Their Founders

It is no little wonder that many Americans actually beleive that they live in and are governed by a Capitalistic system of Government & Capitalistic Economic System. The USA maybe more Socialist than the current Russia Government. Shock Horror - Shudder the thought. Much truth to that statement if you car to know. That statement is very hard to make, but has much truth. If Americans really understood & their economic system and government, they would understand just how very Socialist they are. The Truth is often a bitter pill.

The Perception of Peace, Green Movements, Fairness of monetary exchange, the chance to rid the world of a hegemony,(maybe to just create another one) the idea to put power back in its Euorpean cradle - will and is apealing to the mases East & West. Sadly their will be a loser. The USA economic system (hegemony) does not have much experience in losing. Time will provide for that experience of change. It is upon us Now.

Cavan Man: 6-21-01 21:26 #56609 - Excellent & Sobering Thoughts of Gentle Reason - Thanks

Camel: 6-21-01 23:01 # 56616 - The very same as I said to Cavan Man - Thanks for your contribution.

"S"


Black Blade (6/22/01; 01:14:45MT - usagold.com msg#: 56620)
Blackout Forecasts' Dark Side
http://www.latimes.com/news/state/20010620/t000051130.html

Snippits:

Already Californians anticipate power outages when temperatures rise. By August, the occasional annoyances endured so far--stoplights gone dark, computers, air conditioners and elevators idled--could seem almost quaint. At best, they say, Californians can expect some gridlocked intersections, an occasionally overloaded 911 system, perhaps some business bankruptcies, certainly inconvenience. At worst, the Western power grid could crash, causing uncontrolled blackouts that might lead to looting, contaminated water supplies, even civil unrest.

Black Blade: The social fabric will be ripped apart if the energy crisis in California goes unchecked. With rolling blackouts come rolling riots with looting and mayhem. It will likely be Watts and Rodney King riots all over again. The articles discusses various scenarios and possibilities. An "interesting" analysis and commentary. Who needs Y2K when we have the energy crisis?

BTW, John Lee Hooker died yesterday. Bummer - though I am more partial to Chicago and Texas blues, when it comes to the Delta Blues, John Lee was the King.

Golden Dreams All!




ViewYesterday's Discussion.


Permission to reprint is hereby granted where the USAGOLD name is cited along with our web address, mailing address and phone number. For electronic reproductions, citing the post heading and the http://www.usagold.com/cpmforum/ website address as the source is sufficient.


P.O. Box 460009
Denver, Colorado 80246-0009

1-800-869-5115 (US)
00-800-8720-8720 (EU)

303-399-6759 (Fax)

admin@usagold.com


Office Hours
6:00am - 5:00pm
(U.S. Mountain Time)
Monday - Friday

American Numismatic Association
Member since 1975

Industry Council for Tangible Assets

USAGOLD Centennial Precious Metals is a BBB Accredited Business. Click for the BBB Business Review of this Gold, Silver & Platinum Dealers in Denver CO

Zero Complaints

 

Thursday February 9
website support: sitemaster@usagold.com
Site Map - Privacy- Disclaimer
The USAGOLD logo and stylized gold coin pile are trademarks of Michael J. Kosares.
© 1997-2012 Michael J. Kosares / USAGOLD All Rights Reserved