ARCHIVED DISCUSSION FROM 1/19/2003
All times are U.S. Mountain Time
(Yesterday's Discussion.)
Trojan
(01/19/03; 23:09:25MT - usagold.com msg#: 94981)
I Detect A Sea Change In Attitudes To Bush
I was just reading a column in the NY Times by Frank Rich called "Joe Millionaire For President"
I think it reflects a much more critical look at the President's Policies.
The same critical look other countries around the world have had for months. I also think this problem is not helping confidence in the Us Dollar.
The end of the Article:
Nor does anyone know what vanquishing Saddam and then governing Iraq will cost in either dollars or lives.
Lawrence Lindsey, the chief White House economic adviser, was fired after he put the bill at $100 billion to $200 billion. But William Nordhaus, the Yale economist, puts the Lindsey estimate at the low end, with the high end being $1.6 trillion over a decade.
Whatever the number, the cost of the war isn't being factored at all into the budget proposal the White House will send to Congress, according to USA Today.
Yet even with that huge sum unaccounted for, the tax cuts and deficits are already so out of control that budgetary allotments for homeland security are being cut back.
As for the American troops to be thrown at Saddam, remember those leaked Pentagon war plans from last summer that capped the total at 250,000? This week ABC's John McWethy reported that the number had escalated to 350,000 before the battle is even joined.
Mr. Bush's rhetoric says we can have it all — lower taxes, better schools, a war or two or three, civil defense — without pain. But the numbers don't add up, and when the expanded war becomes a reality, we'll see a bottom line that not even the smoothest politician's bedside manner can obscure.
While we wait, an anxious nation whiles away the time with "Joe Millionaire," a "reality" TV show in which a sweet-talking con man charms a bevy of credulous women into believing he will give them a fairy-tale ending.
And why not? It's a perfect reflection of the reality of this moment, right down to its predictable, all too inevitable, denouement.
Black Blade
(01/19/03; 22:29:23MT - usagold.com msg#: 94980)
Low inflation? Only if you're an economist
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/print_story.asp?print=1&guid={A9664F72-7233-41ED-895D-1B49666C08DC}&siteid=yhoo
Snippit:
NORTH PALM BEACH, Fla. (Bankrate.com) -- The second consecutive monthly decline in the core Producer Price Index has spurred more concern about the potential onset of deflation. A lack of inflation? Hardly! An increasing rate of inflation amid a further decline in nominal interest rates has anyone living on a fixed income understandably uptight. All figures are unadjusted data, which as stated on the Bureau of Labor Statistics Web site "are of primary interest to consumers concerned about the prices they actually pay," as opposed to seasonally adjusted data that eliminates fluctuations due to climate, holidays and production cycles.
Although the core CPI, which excludes the volatile sectors of food and energy, was up 1.9 percent in 2002 vs. a 2.7 percent advance in 2001, I don't know too many people exempt from food and energy costs. Food costs were up 1.5 percent last year, but the index for fruits and vegetables increased 4.9 percent. Who said it doesn't cost more to eat healthy? Energy costs accelerated 10.7 percent last year. Since it gets mighty cold this time of year in most parts of the country, my guess is that many households are feeling a draft in their wallets every time they turn the thermostat up a few degrees.
Transportation costs rose 3.8 percent, but gasoline costs were up a staggering 24.8 percent in 2002. Presumably much of this is attributable to unrest in Venezuela and uncertainties surrounding potential war with Iraq. Nonetheless, think about that the next time you're tapping your foot at the pump while filling up the SUV.
Housing costs were up 2.4 percent, and even water, sewer and trash-collection service costs jumped 3.2 percent. Many families send their kids to private school and are trying to save for a college education. Education costs climbed 6.6 percent, including a 6.2 percent jump in the category of "tuition, other school fees and child care."
Medical care is another staple of every household, and costs have increased here, as well. Somewhat surprisingly, the index for prescription drugs was virtually unchanged, though I'm sure there are many that will dispute that. Hospital and related services led the charge, advancing 9.8 percent.
Black Blade: YES!!! I have been pointing out for years that the BLS is BS. The statistical massage with phoney baloney filters, hedonic deflators, seasonality, etc. renders the BLS data utterly useless and meaningless. It has been used to deceive the US public and rip off elderly citizens on Social Security while absconding with the tax for the General Account while paying out a few miserly crumbs to the Alpo eating recipients.
TownCrier
(01/19/03; 22:17:07MT - usagold.com msg#: 94979)
The investor's bottom line
For those who can't find the time necesary to read through Jim Puplava's expansive commentary, here is the bottom line that might be of most interest to you.
----Excerpt--------
The economic and financial risks are high. However, the geopolitical risks are even higher. I can't think of a year where there are so many wild cards that overhang the market.
The US survived 9-11 by expanding the printing presses at full throttle and going deeper into debt as a country. Since 2001, M3 has grown by $1.5 trillion. It is simply mind-boggling to consider all the permutations and possibilities that exist with so many wild cards hanging over the economy and the markets. With this many what-ifs on the table, it would be by the grace of God and a miracle if none of them are played. I will name the major ones. Any single one of them could throw a forecast way off course. Each one is a major confidence shaker.
War with Iraq and/or North Korea
A major terrorist attack that follows a war with Iraq
A broadening Middle East War
The fall of the House of Saud
Sovereign debt defaults, i.e. Brazil
A spike in energy prices due to terrorism or war
A major default of a money center bank or major US financial institution i.e. Fannie/Freddie
The failure of a major derivative player such as a bank or hedge fund
A spike in credit spreads due to growing bankruptcies
Given all of these uncertainties, where should one invest this year? I believe the "Next Big Thing" is going to be in "things" such as commodities. The big winners in this decade are going to be gold, silver, and energy. Other commodities from sugar, coffee, cocoa and grains, to other soft goods will also be winners. Commodity prices will rise because of two trends: a declining US dollar and rising populations and industrialization of developing economies.
The time for paper is over and the rise of "things" has just begun.
------end excerpt-----
Waverider
(01/19/03; 22:13:02MT - usagold.com msg#: 94978)
Japan appears headed to 0% yields on bonds
http://www.iht.com/articles/83818.html
Snipppit:
"If you think yields on Japan's government bonds cannot go any lower, investors beg to differ. Most are betting that deflation accelerates and yields fall even further toward zero percent. While good news for punters, the trend could cause problems for Japan's economy. A big drop in long-term interest rates could wipe out income gains for financial institutions, which invest primarily in bonds, and leave them and the economy in even worse shape. When investors speculate about financial crisis here, it's a surge in bond yields they fear. Japan's public debt load is nearly 40 percent bigger than the economy. Deflation, which increases the inflation-adjusted value of debt, makes Tokyo's debt load even larger. If investors get antsy about the government's balance sheet, they may drive up rates and slam the economy. But then a plunge in yields could be bad, too. We think a financial system crisis would more likely be the result of an extreme fall in long-term interest rates wiping out income gains for financial institutions, than the more orthodox causal effect of a sudden surge in long-term interest rates," said Takehiro Sato, an economist at Morgan Stanley. With the market expecting deflation to worsen, it's a pretty safe bet that Japanese yields will grind lower this year. Mind you, they don't have very far to go. The benchmark 10-year is yielding 0.88 percent, not too far from the all-time low of 0.73 percent reached in October 1998. The two-year bond is almost at zero percent, yielding 0.06 percent.
Waverider: Meanwhile the Nikkei's not a pretty site tonight - off 2%.
a nation of one
(01/19/03; 22:01:16MT - usagold.com msg#: 94977)
kmart
And they call it 'equity.'
Cytek
(01/19/03; 21:24:16MT - usagold.com msg#: 94976)
BLUE LIGHT SPECIAL
Read in Sunday morning's news that KMART's board is going to vote on dismissing all common shares, over 519 million. That's right folks, everyone that invested in KM over the last few years gets "0", worthless paper. They will issue new stock to secured creditors, banks and bond holders and then emerge out of bankrupcy. The investors who bought and held in their portfolios and IRA's get the big BLUE LIGHT SPECIAL. Hmmm, wonder if those investors will shop at KMART ever again.
TownCrier
(01/19/03; 21:24:02MT - usagold.com msg#: 94975)
Black Blade, here is that Puplava article, a bit closer to home