gold coins and bullion
Centennial Precious Metals, Inc: Serving Gold Coin & Bullion Investors Since 1973
Open for business 6am to 6pm Mountain Time
(Home Page) (How to Buy Gold) (Gold Coin Images) (Daily Market Report) (Live Gold Price)
(First-time Buyers) (Gold Discussion) (ABCs of Gold Book) (Gold IRA) (Buy Gold Coins Online)
(European Clientele)

Online Information Packet
(About Us)

 

Welcome to the USAGOLD Gold Discussion Archives. Looking to buy gold coins and bullion? The archives of this gold discussion forum are a treasure trove of information to educate investors about protecting their wealth through portfolio diversification with private gold ownership. The discussion forum also covers the wider issues of the past, present, and future role of gold in international monetary policy and the dynamics of the modern gold markets. To join the debate request a discussion password here.

The opinions posted by all guests at this forum are expressly their own and do not necessarily represent the views of the management or staff of USAGOLD - Centennial Precious Metals. The hosting of this forum shall therefore not be construed as equivalent to endorsement by USAGOLD - Centennial Precious Metals of any of the opinions posted here.

 

FORUM ARCHIVES
Select date of the archive you wish to view

Month Day Year
Archives date back to September 22, 1998




WELCOME TO THE ARCHIVES!
(MAIN) (Post a New Message)

(Forum Archives - Hall of Fame)

(Gold Trail - Thoughts!)

(View Today's Discussion) (View Previous Day's Discussion) (View Next Day's Discussion)

ARCHIVED DISCUSSION FROM 5/11/2001
All times are U.S. Mountain Time

(Yesterday's Discussion.)

Journeyman (05/11/01; 23:58:19MT - usagold.com msg#: 53456)
Regulation & currency controls @Trail Guide (ORO), Randy, Tree, ge, Peter Asher, Mr Gresham, ALL

Must be short!

Hi TG!

Regards more U.S. regulation to compensate for falling dollar: (much more skipped for lack of time)

Because currency controls, in the age of instant electronic transfer & sophisticated fund managers, no longer work (proved originally by Spain about a decade ago and more lately Mahathir of Malaysia, Indonesia, etc.) U.S. will not dare attempt regulations, nor will they work if they are attempted.

ALSO Randy & TG regards corruption of money: 1. It's first and foremost a matter of degree. Central banks turn a scratch into a severed artery as far as dilution of the money supply through fractional reserve lending. Thus while there would be some corruption & dilution in a transactional gold economy, it would simply not be physically possible for it to be as rampant as in a pure megabyte situation where the money supply could simply be doubled or for that matter multiplied by 100 instantaneously. 2. Just because corruption might occur is no reason to quit the field in favor of the greater of two evils, namely pure fiat; Your house may eventually rot and fall to ruin but that's not a good reason to live in a cave!!

Regards,
Journeyman


ORO (05/11/01; 23:37:00MT - usagold.com msg#: 53455)
Randy - JP Morgan was not a CB
What you seem to ignore here is that JP Morgan used his own funds and his own client's money for the purpose of making a profit and avoiding further loss of business if his trade counter parties were to fail and their assets and those of their clients locked up in bankruptcy courts.

Central banks and governments use Other People's Money, without their consent and for both the purpose of imaginary assistance to the financial markets and for the purpose of gaining stature and widening their authority and patronage.

The Abominable Communist Eccles who's name is carved into the Fed building stands as proof final and incontrovertible of the origins and purposes of that institution. These do not include any of the oft stated items of faith regarding its character and function. It was not what it seems today, and its present fiduciaries, however benign, still must contend with the power granted the institution in its charter and the simple fact that such power should never have been bestowed on one organization in any country seeking to enjoy the rich fruit of free trade.

The central bank is entrusted and authorized to do the impossible: make the one single decision that replaces billions of decisions by the whole of a country's people, and to isolate these decisions from those made in other countries. That alone is sufficient to negate any claim of beneficial association between central banks and the financial marketplace.



working-kirk (05/11/01; 23:32:42MT - usagold.com msg#: 53454)
interest rates cuts
As you might have noticed, a lot of people are hoping for a
rate cut next week. One of the claims is a rate cut is anti-inflationary. Can someone explain to a simple working
man how a rate cut is anti-inflationary?


Black Blade (05/11/01; 23:19:12MT - usagold.com msg#: 53453)
Got gold? Asia banks haven't got much
http://pacific.bcentral.com/pacific/stories/2001/05/07/daily39.html

Snippit:

Asia central banks have scant gold holdings compared to their total reserve, a World Gold Council meeting in Honolulu has been told. "They're surprisingly low when compared to those of the United States, Europe and the Middle East," says World Gold Council regulatory affairs specialist Dick Ware. He says Asian central banks typically hold 1 to 5 percent of reserves in gold compared to 34 percent in Germany, 41percent in France, 45 percent in Italy and 56 percent in the United States.

Black Blade: If sentiment should change, and Asian central banks decide that gold reserves are preferable to US Treasuries, then the POG would probably rocket higher. The former Japanese finance minister made that suggestion a couple of years ago. Hmmm...


Black Blade (05/11/01; 23:08:30MT - usagold.com msg#: 53452)
Gold funds shining above the rest
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/yhoo/story.asp?source=blq/yhoo&siteid=yhoo&dist=yhoo&guid=%7BFD69FC24%2D4C57%2D4C48%2DA288%2D8D69122F6913%7D

Snippit:

NEW YORK (CBS.MW) -- Like a phoenix rising from the ashes, gold funds have flown to the top of this year's performance charts, returning 15 percent so far in 2001, Lipper Inc. said Friday.

Black Blade: Gold equities prices usually lead the price of gold itself. This could be positive news.


Black Blade (05/11/01; 22:51:59MT - usagold.com msg#: 53451)
US Energy Secretary Blames OPEC for High Gasoline Prices
http://www.slb.com/ba.cfm?baid=1&storyid=223899

Snippit:

Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham said OPEC was at fault for high fuel prices, conflicting with comments made earlier in the week by Vice President Dick Cheney that a shortage of U.S. refining capacity, not the cartel, has caused gasoline prices to soar.

Black Blade: I'm afraid that Spencer is wrong and Dick is right on this one. The problem isn't so much the supply of oil, OPEC production cuts, or implied threats by certain OPEC members. The problem is the ability to refine and distribute the EPA mandated reformulated fuels that vary in grade and content without any uniform standard from one region to another. Bureaucracy in action and incompetence at the EPA. This does not mean that OPEC is completely out of the picture. They could very well cut production in order to maintain a desirable price for their crude. Who can blame them if they do? The real focus on the energy crisis should be on electricity as that is where the US is most vulnerable. Gasoline standards could be relaxed with the stroke of a pen, electricity is a bit more problematic.


Netking (05/11/01; 22:51:28MT - usagold.com msg#: 53450)
Randy @ The Tower
Randy(53438) - Do you have any more details on this PRC coin issue, sizes & content, prices in local currency, number minted & issued etc?

Black Blade (05/11/01; 22:28:58MT - usagold.com msg#: 53449)
Bonedaddy - again
BTW, you mention that X-ray testing is not such a viable method for testing. How about Dye penetrant or Magnetic Particle (Magnaflux) testing on pipe? It is cheaper and yet can be a quick means of checking welds. On the subject of pipelines, Questar (STR) purchased the ARCO oil pipeline that goes from New Mexico to S. California, and they are converting it to a NG pipeline. I think that the California politics is somewhat screwy and that they will get burned as there is a strange tariff imposed by California on "undesirable" NG, even though they desperately need NG. Go figure.

- Black Blade


Black Blade (05/11/01; 22:19:26MT - usagold.com msg#: 53448)
Bonedaddy
I hear ya! I have been rather busy as well. I closed up my office in Nevada gold country as the mining business has effectively destroyed their own business (forward sales, high-grading, inept management, etc.). Actually I have begun marketing my services for NG in the Powder River Basin (Gillette, Sheridan, and Casper). It looks very positive here. I know that one could not find a drill rig very easy. I have a client who is struggling to find enough rigs and drillers before their leases expire. That is one major bottleneck for NG production. I also have talked to some drillers in the Metals exploration side and they have expressed an interest in getting into the CBM game as well. I talked to one driller/owner who bought his rig 3 years ago. Last year he was 3 times as much by another driller. This year he was offered about 9 times as much. There is very strong demand - but no rigs. I think that NG prices will remain high from here on. There are many NG-fired power plants coming on line over the next few years and that alone should pressure prices further. I guess that we both have interests in the same area of work and investments. Natural resources should do very well for the next several years. The gold price fixing is likely to come unglued as these economic pressures from high energy costs are factored in (squeezed profit margins, inflationary - stagflationary pressures, etc.). Base metals look to do well as infrastructure will need to be upgraded and new infrastructure will need to be added. Times are about to get "interesting." Cheers!

- Black Blade


ge (05/11/01; 22:17:14MT - usagold.com msg#: 53447)
Trail Guide
Trail Guide writes:

Begin Quote

I borrow 100oz of money gold from ten people so as to spend that gold doing commerce business. The hard money theory has us thinking that if I fail and cannot pay back the gold, this little portion of the money supply contracts. Thereby the gold system is perfect, as it slows the economic excess.
This is a minor example of gold banking. On a tiny scale. It works, as long as we don't act out our motions in a political way.

Conversely, if gold was not part of a banking,,,,, credit,,,,, lending system,,,, rather it is just a tradable, non-lendable non-official money asset,,,,, then those ten people would have given me their gold and became part owners in my (ours now) enterprise.

End Quote

The second case would be acceptable if I, as a lender (or owner, if you like) could make claims against the remaining assets of the failed business, as a lender/owner. However that gate is closed since, that would be "enforcement of collateral attachment anytime physical gold is traded, lent or involved in a trade", and forbidden by international law. Wouldn't gold be useless under such a law?

There is another danger namely; a vast business potential is created for mafia: Gold loans made under special contracts, fees paid to mafia for every contract signed and and private gold contract enforcement agencies flourish.


Bonedaddy (05/11/01; 21:42:29MT - usagold.com msg#: 53446)
Ground Zero in the NG arena.
Black Blade, it is good to see that you are still posting your erudite energy commentary. I have been too busy
throwing dirt in the air to visit the table much in the last few months. I'd like to offer a few tidbits on where it looks like natural gas is going for the 2001-2002 heating season.
The conventional wisdom is that enough new production is comming on line and enough new pipe is being laid to meet the higher demand. The price projections I am hearing from some very astute marketing types place NG in the mid $3-$4 dollar range for the next twelve months.
However, the progress that gets reported to management is often beyond "best case scenario". What I see happening in the Powder River Basin is that most of the work is actually a couple of months behind schedule. The single biggest hold up is the lack of water discharge permits for CBM wells in the Campbell-Johnson County areas. There are alot of folks with a dog in that fight, so I won't go into it right now, but producers are going to have a tough time meeting projected production numbers. The other hold up is construction. A big inch line from Natural Bridge to the Cheyenne hub was supposed to begin construction in May and complete in November. This line is the key to the door out of the basin. Until it is completed, there is now where for new production to go. The offical word is that all is well and right on schedule for November line pack. But, so far nobody is clearing ROW and May is half over. The tough thing about large diameter gas pipe is that it is so slow to weld. It takes two welders to make each butt weld and the pipe must stay heated between each pass or the welds can crack. From what I've seen, five months to build 130 miles of 30 inch is pretty optimistic. If every thing goes well, a good contractor can do it. If you get a good old Wyoming winter, beginning in October like last year, there is a risk of welds cooling down too fast and cracking. Repairs can really add up. X-ray also takes a lot longer on big pipe because it is so darn thick. The last major hurdle before start-up is hydrotesting. 30 inch probably holds about 20 gallons of water per linear foot. 100,000 gallons of water per mile more or less. You my friend, have no doubt worked with water in Wyoming/Montana winters.
So, officially every thing is fine and that information is what the marketers use to determine both gas price and basis for transportation rates.
It's kinda like John Wayne said in Rio Bravo, "If anything goes wrong... your fault,.... my fault,.... nobody's fault,.... I'm gonna blow a hole in you I can read a newspaper through."



Canuck (05/11/01; 21:14:16MT - usagold.com msg#: 53445)
Test
Testing
Last 4 posts (including this one) were tests.

Canuck (05/11/01; 21:12:40MT - usagold.com msg#: 53444)
Canuck
Canuck
Canuck

Canuck (05/11/01; 21:11:13MT - usagold.com msg#: 53443)

http://www.sharelynx.net/Photos/Gold/PMCityGold.jpg


Canuck (05/11/01; 21:09:41MT - usagold.com msg#: 53442)
Did I just see a little yellow window?


Tree in the Forest (05/11/01; 20:34:41MT - usagold.com msg#: 53441)
Randy
In reading over your last post to me, I find only one major thing which you said that I disagree with. This may surprise you but it is where you said that banks do not charge income tax. While they do not charge this directly, I believe that the income tax was very much inspired by the banking system in particular the inauguration of the Federal Reserve. It is no accident that the income tax followed close on the heels of the Fed. The Fed is a private, primarily European banking cartel and the owners of the Fed (and all banks) make money by giving loans. It is the interest on these loans that generate their income.

I knew several individuals, doctors and architects, who subsequently went into the banking business. I could never figure out why they would seemingly abandon their "calling" to run a bank. It is only in the last several years that I have learned the explanation for their actions; banks print money! The largest conglomerates in the world have banks at their center and this is no accident. Banks print money!

You have to see this through a greedy banker's eyes; pretend for a moment that I am a greedy banker. I love money! And I always want more. Once I understand how banks make money through loans, it becomes obvious that in order for me to make even more money, I must make more loans. But a problem arises: when I print money to make the loans, it causes inflation. How to solve this? Well I could make fewer loans, but then my income drops so that's unacceptable. I know. How about this: I'll make more and more loans and become very rich and to solve the inflation problem, I'll use my influence (and my money) in the American congress to pass a tax that will force people to give back some of their money. Now I can make as many loans as I like and just mop up the excess liquidity through taxation. And my "friends" in congress can get re-elected by using the same system to spread the patronage around. The excess liquidity is taxed back preventing inflation. So my friends and I are now very happy. We're awash in money!

As you can see bankers and the congress support this income tax because it works very much to their benefit allowing them to pursue their goals, and still hold the system together. This income tax was inspired by and supported by the Rockefellers, members of the Fed through Chase. They worked hard to insure that they had sufficent means to avoid the resultant taxation through trusts, foundations and other tax loopholes. Ignore what you read in the press and Forbes about the wealthiest people in the world. The wealthiest people in the world keep a very low profile and will never be listed in the Forbes 400 or whatever. They are fabulously wealthy, probably trillionaires. Their tax burden is undoubtedly miniscule compared to their wealth. Good people have trouble seeing how some can be so greedy and selfish. But these people exist. And the rest of us pay an unjust and "non-constitutional" income tax to help them get richer. If you have not already done so, please review the legal underpinnings of the Fed and IRS in my post of April 22 #52341. Good night Randy and thank you to all who read my posts.


R Powell (05/11/01; 20:07:37MT - usagold.com msg#: 53440)
Beowulf
Centaur's 1.61 million ounce hedge book
I believe if 12 troy ounces make a pound, then 1.6 million ounces is about 66.5 tons.

Thursday, May 10 3:46 PM SGT

Gold Market Keeps Eye On Australia's Centaur Mining Hedge
SYDNEY (Dow Jones)--Immediate short covering by Australian gold miner Centaur Mining & Exploration Ltd. (A.CTR) to close its hedge books could give gold prices a short boost but wouldn't sustain a rally, dealers told Dow Jones Newswires Thursday.
Although news of the beleaguered miner's position sent gold prices up by around US$5 a troy ounce in New York trade Wednesday, the rise petered out in Asian trade Thursday as the market sat back and took a closer look.

The market now believes Centaur's short position isn't substantial enough to trigger a sharp ascent and that it would also depend on how soon it chose to close its positions.

"Who in their right mind would buy 1 million ounces at once?" asked a Sydney-based dealer.

According to Centaur's report for the quarter ended December 31, 2000, the company has hedged a total of 1.61 million ounces of gold at an average price of A$423 a troy ounce from 2000-01 to 2008-09.

"That's not an insignificant amount and could tighten the position in the market," said John Macdonald, a mining analyst with CIBC World Markets.

But it would depend on the market conditions when the company closes its books, which in turn depends on who would be responsible for that, he said.

Receivers, for instance, could be less amenable to any exposure, while counterparty hedges would want to liquidate at better prices, he said.

U.S. bondholders appointed PricewaterhouseCooper receivers in March in a bid to recover a US$225 million debt from Centaur. Centaur itself appointed administrators the day before, which in Australia gives an insolvent or near-insolvent company breathing space to deal with its financial difficulties.

Centaur's creditors are set to meet Monday in Perth, and could put the company into liquidation.

Despite initial excitement during early Sydney trade Thursday that gold could test US$272/oz should Centaur liquidate, some other participants said Wednesday's rally was mainly due to technical factors.

"There was mainly buying from funds between London and New York, and not related to Centaur, which triggered stops at US$267-US$268/oz," said another Sydney-based dealer.

A third Sydney-based dealer concurred, adding the talk on Centaur could have been spread by those trying to tempt funds to cover.

Joseph Gutnick, Centaur's chairman and managing director, couldn't be reached for a comment. Neither could administrators or receivers.

At 0742 GMT Thursday, spot gold was quoted at US$269.40/oz, down from US$269.90/oz in New York late Wednesday.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Black Blade (05/11/01; 19:17:18MT - usagold.com msg#: 53439)
Saxulum and Camel
Saxulum

Your post reminds me of when we last had two major oil shocks in 1973 Arab Oil Embargo, and the Oil Shock of 1979. Tankers in the Atlantic would sometimes turn around in mid shipment and go to either Amsterdam or the US depending on which refiner would pay the higher price for the crude oil. I imagine that the Europeans will not be too happy if we in the US cause the price of petroleum to rise by drawing off supplies to the US. It is bad enough that they are gouged by their governments on petrol taxes. Definitely cause to hedge ones bets with a bit-o-gold insurance.

Camel

Even though NG stocks have risen I would still expect there to be a shortage of NG. First of all, stocks usually begin to rise in the Spring months as it is not too cold or too hot (sorta like Goldilocks and the 3 bears ;-) ). Come this summer there will be as much as 20% more electricity consumed for air conditioning alone. Virtually all new power generating plants and planned power plants are NG-fired. There are at least 275 new plants to be built by the year 2006. It was only a couple of years ago that summer NG production was injected into storage. This is a problem as the "New Economy" requires a lot of energy for computers, server farmer, telephony, internet manufacturing and service industries, etc. So instead of storing NG during the Spring and Summer, more and more is being consumed. You may have noticed that even as though storage has increased some, it is still 30% below the 5 year average levels. This Summer, we could see a lot more consumption and a lot less storage. We may get a slight jump in storage in the Fall, but come Winter we just might get bit.

Now Dick Cheney. He had no experience in petroleum prior to his stint at Halliburton. His position as CEO just might have been a political payoff for favors given when he served under Daddy Bush as Secretary of Defense. However, he is correct about the critical energy situation that we face in the US. Bubba Clinton and Al Bore certainly dropped the ball on energy with misguided wacky environmentalism that could well cost us much more in energy costs (both financially and environmentally) than was necessary. We have fallen behind the production curve and they also locked up public lands from further petroleum exploration and production. Of course when people become uncomfortable (especially Americans), they demand that something - anything be done - they believe that abundant cheap energy is a guaranteed right. Now we have our backs to the wall as far as energy is concerned. The Market Miracle of the 1990's Bull Market was fueled in no uncertain terms by the abundant supply of cheap energy. That expansion of course required that even more energy be made available for even more growth. That is where I think (and hope) that Dick Cheney as the CEO of Halliburton may have learned that a vigorous petroleum exploration and production program must be initiated in order to either continue to fuel future growth, or prepare for what I believe to be the inevitable economic collapse as the costs of energy are likely to never see the low prices of the 1990's ever again (barring the discovery of cold fusion perhaps). Reason number one why I buy gold, silver and undervalued energy shares.

Hybrid vehicles. Might be OK for those in urban settings, however, I would need the power train to get into rough terrain and to make quick repairs in desolate areas. However, it would be difficult to encourage over 200 million Americans to pony up several thousand dollars apiece to purchase a new vehicle, just as unlikely is to encourage everyone to junk their appliances and computers and to pony up even more to buy green energy saving devices. This is especially true of former "New Economy" and "dot.com" investors. At this point it is a tough sell as many hope to just remain employed. Hybrid vehicles will take several years to cycle through and replace the vehicles currently on the road.

Peggy Noonan? She was one of Ronny's speech writers. Now she writes editorials for the Wall Street Journal. BTW, did you know that Ben Stein of Comedy Central TV was one of Richard Nixon's speech writers? Now he has a TV show where you can supposedly win his money. Hmmm...

I don't read religious texts very much. Just not my thing. However, I am currently reading The Seven Military Classics of Ancient China translated by Ralph Sawyer and Mei-Chun Sawyer. I am reading the first book - T'ai Kung's Six Secret Teachings. It is purportedly T'ai Kung's political advice and tactical instructions to Kings Wen and Wu of the Chou Dynasty in the eleventh century BC. I am also reading Miguel De Cervantes Don Quijote de la Mancha (vol. 1) in the original Classical Castellano. It has a better feel for the almost dry humor than in the English version. My friends say that I'm a sick man. I just have the philosophy that if one does not at least learn one thing new each day, then that day has been wasted. That is why I come here and let Trail Guide, ORO, and even the Stranger twist my brain now and then ;-)

Cheers!

- Black Blade


Randy (@ The Tower) (05/11/01; 16:56:56MT - usagold.com msg#: 53438)
Interesting phrasing on this Bridge News report from China
Hong Kong, May 11 (BridgeNews) - The People's Bank of China, the central bank, will issue a new set of gold and silver commemorative coins on May 15, the official Xinhua News Agency said Friday. The set will include three gold coins and two silver coins, that will be the legal currency in China, the report said. The central bank has a monopoly on gold in China.
---------------------
A good time to throw in the reminder that the bigger steps toward gold market liberalization are just days away.

I'll leave you with that thought. Duty calls...


Randy (@ The Tower) (05/11/01; 16:50:24MT - usagold.com msg#: 53437)
Steep learning curve on that!

Meanwhile...

The Federal Reserve added $3.5 billion in temporary reserves to the banking system today through 6-day repurchase agreements. Fed funds were trading below the target rate.


Centennial Precious Metals, Inc. / USAGOLD (05/11/01; 16:42:39MT - usagold.com msg#: 53436)
Hard assets... easy access.


Good ole' Ben Franklin says, "Experience keeps a dear school, yet a fool will learn in no other."


Isn't that what this Forum is all about? I have learned over many years of counselling people from all walks of life that the cost of preparation does not have to be the better part of ones assets, nor does it have to be the commitment of a lifetime. But the peace of mind which attends such preparation puts a smile on the face, confidence in the step, and a quiet, settled disposition. ---MK (5/9/2001)


Start your weekend on the right foot.by securing a quantity of gold bought within arm's reach of 22-year low prices. Choose daily from our regular assortment of pre-1933s or gold bullion. Also be advised, the small assortment of Queen Victoria Gold Sovereigns are selling well, both online and by phone. If you'd like to round out your gold portfolio with the "spice of life" (variety), then you'll want to act on these without undue delay while supplies last. We have had entire caches of coins in the past claimed by a single large buyer. So, to you we say, "Take one or take them all!" It is always our pleasure to be your friend and partner in the gold business.


TOLL FREE PHONE

(US) 800-869-5115
(Can) 1-800-294-9462
(Aus) 0011-800-2761-2761
(EU) 00-800-2760-2760


Please Remember: It is your purchase from Centennial Precious Metals / USAGOLD that nourishes these pages.



Camel (05/11/01; 16:32:12MT - usagold.com msg#: 53435)
Gas injection rates.
Thanks for the info Black Blade. Your oil and gas commentary is about the best on the web. I've been hearing rumblings about a respectable size build in the stocks of natuaral gas, which if true would probably change the equation for the doomsday scenario for this winter that a lot of people(including myself) have been predicting. I don't really know enough about the subject to judge how much is sufficiant, except that I have heard the numbers are approching the average for the last few years. True or not?

Speaking of experiance, I was wondering if VP Cheney had any experiance in the oil and gas industry when he took over at Haliburton. Have allways been curious about that.Course that initial presentation on energy he made was shamefully incompetant given all that we have learned from Campbell et al over the last few years. I agree an all out drilling effort is necessary, but if Cambells numbers are right there is an urgent need to develop fuel efficiant cars. Bush at least has tried to set things back on the right track, but I personally heard Bush redicule Gores proposal to develop the hybrid vehicle. Heard it with my own ears. Not only did he redicule it it was painfully obvious at the time he didn't even know what one was. Shameful!

I often wonder if all you Reagan lovers aren't actually in love with that Noonan woman, or who ever it was that wrote his speaches. My favorite line of his was from one of his State of the Union messages where he quoted Lao Tsu, "Ruling a Great Country is Like Cooking a Small Fish", meaning, don't over do it. Course Reagan had no more heard Lao Tsu than Bush had heard of the hybrid vehicle, it was Noonan who wrote the speech.

About the only one of the old Holy Books that I still read is the I Ching. I allready know the Bible ,or at least have the general idea, and I don't see much point in reading it over and over again. The I Ching on the other hand allways seems to offer something new.ANOTHER in one of his messages once used an image that is similar to one from the I Ching and I was curious if he had ever studied it. Course so many of those images are Universal in that they draw much from the world of nature and the older agrarian societies that they surely would appear in many cultures.


Chris Powell (05/11/01; 15:46:51MT - usagold.com msg#: 53434)
"Huge success" for GATA African Gold Summit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gata/message/759
A report from GATA Chairman Bill
Murphy in Durban, South Africa.


To subscribe to GATA's dispatches
by email and get them immediately so
you don't have to go look for them,
send an email to:

gata-subscribe@yahoogroups.com


megatron (05/11/01; 15:15:42MT - usagold.com msg#: 53433)
YES YES YES!!!! Save the Tax Havens!!!!
I knew it! There was a normal person in government somewhere
and his name is Paul O'Neal. He undid what those ruthless human garbage under the KlintlerFurh subjected the world to.
I hope their mothers hate them.


Peter Asher (05/11/01; 15:15:00MT - usagold.com msg#: 53432)
Trail Guide (05/11/01; 14:32:34MT - usagold.com msg#: 53425)

Re your A,) I borrow 100oz of money gold from ten people so as to spend that gold doing commerce business. The hard money theory has us
thinking that if I fail and cannot pay back the gold, this little portion of the money supply contracts. Thereby the gold system is
perfect, as it slows the economic excess.
This is a minor example of gold banking. On a tiny scale. It works, as long as we don't act out our motions in a political way.

& B) Conversely, if gold was not part of a banking,,,,, credit,,,,, lending system,,,, rather it is just a tradable, non-lendable non- official
money asset,,,,, then those ten people would have given me their gold and became part owners in my (ours now) enterprise.
When it fails, our gold money is gone and no credit contract is lost in the process. Society at large will not come to our collective
defense, no matter the scale of the loss. You see, we lost our assets, not society's official money!

Seems that A)_ is lending money and B) is either issuing a bond or stock.


R Powell (05/11/01; 14:52:42MT - usagold.com msg#: 53431)
GATA
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gata/message/758
I don't know if this has been reported yet or not. It prints out at five pages so check the ink supply in the printer! Hope I got the link right.
Rich


Beowulf (05/11/01; 14:52:12MT - usagold.com msg#: 53430)
Gold funds shining above the rest!
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/yhoo/story.asp?source=blq/yhoo&siteid=yhoo&dist=yhoo&guid=%7BFD69FC24%2D4C57%2D4C48%2DA288%2D8D69122F6913%7D
Gold funds shining above the rest
By Craig Tolliver, CBS.MarketWatch.com
Last Update: 3:45 PM ET May 11, 2001

<snip>

NEW YORK (CBS.MW) -- Like a phoenix rising from the ashes, gold funds have flown to the top of this year's performance charts, returning 15 percent so far in 2001, Lipper Inc. said Friday.

<unsnip>

-Beowulf: Anyway I posted this because of the following sentence that caught my attention.

<snip>
The supply pinch anticipated in recent days reflects how troubled Australian miner Centaur (CTRL: news, msgs, alerts) may be forced to cover a short position on 1.6 million ounces, Cho said.

This could substantially tighten supply and boost demand over the short term'she said.
<unsnip>

-Beowulf: So now Centaur is short 1.6 million ounces? Can anyone verify this info?


Randy (@ The Tower) (05/11/01; 14:48:42MT - usagold.com msg#: 53429)
Keep diggin' that grave, partner...
--- "In the mere existence of the government sponsored central bank you have the cause of paper gold inflation and the dilution of gold values.

Had central banks not stood at the market's edge with a promise of lending gold to anyone who gets stuck owing it at a rate of less than 1%, gold borrowers would not have leased it and not have sold it into the market, and paper gold holders would have checked carefully whether their counterparts could actually deliver."----

You wanna hang your hat on that, ORO???

And just as surely, J.P. Morgan sat idly by on this thumbs when there was no Federal Reserve to provide crisis-era liquidity. Not.

And just as surely, we have recently seen this latter admirable trait in individual investors checking carefully whether their dot.com purchases where sound investments and could actually deliver value. Not.

Methinks your optimism runs too high, my friend, or your pessimism runs too deep. But keep shovelling....we'll surely uncover something. Maybe gold!!


R Powell (05/11/01; 14:48:34MT - usagold.com msg#: 53428)
O fer day
Don't shoot the messanger but
I have to report that we were shutout today.
POG down, XAU down and lease rtaes also down. Almost all markets rise and fall or fall and rise whether advancing or declining. I don't think one bad day reverses the overall direction of the precious metals sector. A downtrend is also not unexpected as today was the last trading day for June gold and silver options. There is news from GATA and I'll post the link shortly. Enjoy the weekend!
Rich


Mr Gresham (05/11/01; 14:38:05MT - usagold.com msg#: 53426)
Doug Noland -- Credit Bubble Bulletin
http://www.prudentbear.com/credit.htm
"The Power of Money" -- read this one before today's comes up (yes, you can always read it as archived there). A lot about our question "What is money". Spend some time mentally walking through the tides that are likely to sweep over us...

Trail Guide (05/11/01; 14:32:34MT - usagold.com msg#: 53425)
Of ORO's World

Hello again. I'll try to address several posters with this.
More comments on our current discussion, proceeding from my #53314.

ORO (5/9/01; 12:53:15MT - usagold.com msg#: 53296)
--------If Europe continues to expand and deepen regulation (as it has of late) while the US simplifies and thins regulation, the advantage would play in the favor of US industries despite higher dollar exchange rates.-------

Of ORO's world:
All of his conclusions above the closing (that statement is printed above) are based on the ongoing dollar reserve system as we have known it over several decades (even further back). Included during that time are all the excesses and faults dumped on the fiat money world by our nation making the best of it's dollar dominance. Also, included in that period were all the defensive plays
taken by other nation states. To be sure, those plays were also filled with excesses and faults, but what else do we expect from political societies.

The ongoing over taxation, deficit spending, fiat inflation, deficit trade balances and mismanagement of private economies has always been with us. Yes, under different names and different degrees, that's true, but no recent period in money history, gold or not, was without an ongoing effort to cheat the system. It was always in a process of decay, no matter what the books tell you. To think otherwise is to disclaim humans as they are.

How often have we heard that some special "hard school of thought" has all this terrible process documented and neatly explains where it all went wrong? Then, goes on to show us how to set it all up again so as to start over on the right foot.

So, trying to present the society as a whole, as "the awful, all controlling big government" on one side and the "good private economy on the other side" argues the lesser side of the larger issue;
-----hard money policy cannot work for long in a credit based system----!

It makes absolutely no difference if we are even on a 100% gold use money system, if we as a society engage in credit
commerce, we will break links with gold.

Consider:

I borrow 100oz of money gold from ten people so as to spend that gold doing commerce business. The hard money theory has us thinking that if I fail and cannot pay back the gold, this little portion of the money supply contracts. Thereby the gold system is perfect, as it slows the economic excess.
This is a minor example of gold banking. On a tiny scale. It works, as long as we don't act out our motions in a political way.

Conversely, if gold was not part of a banking,,,,, credit,,,,, lending system,,,, rather it is just a tradable, non-lendable non- official money asset,,,,, then those ten people would have given me their gold and became part owners in my (ours now) enterprise.
When it fails, our gold money is gone and no credit contract is lost in the process. Society at large will not come to our collective defense, no matter the scale of the loss. You see, we lost our assets, not society's official money!

The difference:

When gold is lent,,,,, when it's part of the banking system,,,,, when it becomes the object of a credit contract,,,,,, this whole hard money system falls into political RISK! No matter how perfect the "schools" have show this to work, in real life, political risk degrades our perfect credit money. This is the gray area that's not ironed out because we cannot iron out society's emotions. Let's see:

In the above, the ten people I borrowed gold from would be holding my IOUs for that 100 ounces. Be they private citizens, banks or corporations they have effectively lost their gold money. The very money of the nation state!

Rather than see their losses made final, and cause harm, they partition the government to intervene by recognizing those money (gold) loans as good on the books. Further, the government is asked to lend some of it's gold (collected through taxes) to me to extend my business life. I continue to function in a small way as I pay on those gold (money) loans. Further, those loans (held by ten lenders) become marketable as they become seasoned. Then, at a discount to their face value, they can be sold or kept as collateral assets. Over time, this is the political risk that seeps into any hard money system. Over time, even a gold credit system is expanded,,,,,, inflated,,,,,, until outright fiat
must come into play.

It never starts out as "big corrupt government and their awful bankers" controlling the "good honest people",,,,,, rather,,,,, it's when a large enough segment of the "good honest people" are threatened with losing enough (gold) money that it could take down the economy,,,,,, they demand (elect into office) that their government and therefore bankers, expand the (gold) credit enough so as to slow
the fall.

Further,

Now, if this remained on such a tiny scale as the above ten, nothing politically would change. But, modern economic structure is never on such a little scale. This is why I say "we are them"! Many are indignant that they be placed in such company and proclaim they would never be part of such
fraud. Well, that is the very nature that splits the society into the same half's ORO sees today.

His closing statement comes at the tail end of a drama that was played out over decades. His small slice of context completely excludes how the USA dollar,,,, gold,,,,, reserve system was parlayed into a cost advantage that will not exist once the dollar falls. We will be the ones,,,,,,, much more so than Europe,,,,,, who ""expand and deepen regulation"" as our "advantage falls away"!


PH, I want to comment on your posts and will do so next. Be back as able. (smile)

TrailGuide



ORO (05/11/01; 14:15:51MT - usagold.com msg#: 53424)
turbohawg - good news
The OECD anti tax haven idea, a joint US Dems and Eurocrat attempt at forming an international tax cartel to eliminate "tax competition" - i.e. to end the possibility of people moving business out of high tax no service countries to low tax high service countries - is part of the global trend of established old Western governments trying to hold on to their revenue and limit their liabilities (entitlements to their own people and to their bond holders) in the face of competition from other governments offering high service, low taxes and a growing wealth of industrial, technical, and cultural advantages.

The split between government and banking has broadened and deepened to include industrialists and even a modicum of public support, and outright denounciations by central bankers of government spending, regulation, and taxation (which lower a bank's profits when governments are denied the benefits of inflation).

This may be why so many EU businesses are investing in the US rather than within the EU.



ORO (05/11/01; 13:51:30MT - usagold.com msg#: 53423)
PH in LA - golden tenders and chickens
The thing that I enthusiastically speak of abolishing is the FRN - legal tender for me would be the commonly accepted monetary instruments of the time - whatever is used for money in the marketplace, be it mortadella sausage or MSFT stock would be legal tender. In a gold standard world gold specie (coin) is the legal tender that a court may dictate for payment if the contracted items of trade are no longer agreed upon by the parties that came to court, or are not practicably available. Government then must accept gold specie in payment of taxes, and it may choose to accept other items in payment of taxes at whatever exchange rate it finds attractive.

There would be no note on which is written "This note is legal tender for all debts public and private". It is the central bank and the currency that I wish to abolish. Both exist by fiat alone.

The paper gold substitutes are fine so far as they are accepted by people willingly rather than by government command or by government sponsorship/subsidy of the issuers.

The inflation of paper gold you see today is a result of central banks providing gold as lenders of last resort at an artificially low rate of interest. In the mere existence of the government sponsored central bank you have the cause of paper gold inflation and the dilution of gold values.

Had central banks not stood at the market's edge with a promise of lending gold to anyone who gets stuck owing it at a rate of less than 1%, gold borrowers would not have leased it and not have sold it into the market, and paper gold holders would have checked carefully whether their counterparts could actually deliver. Furthermore, they could have set interest rates according to their own estimate of risks to delivery rather than at the rates in which gold is available from central banks.

But nature provides a cure for this disease of central banking - "moral hazard", it punishes the central banks by having them choose between honoring promises to lend and sell gold, or seeing the bullion banks and speculators go under engulfed in flames of scandal. Given that central banks are not happy to admit to the error till it is too late to fix it, they will sell gold into the market, and continue to lease gold to bad credits. The gold will then reach the market and no longer be available to the central banks in the future. Once gold is out of their hands, the central banks would not be able to subsidize gold lending and back paper gold. At that time, the markets would be free to adopt gold for monetary purposes - if they like, and the markets historically have liked gold as money - without fear of central banks dumping their metal, lending it, or otherwise disturbing trade in gold.




turbohawg (05/11/01; 13:07:17MT - usagold.com msg#: 53422)
U.S. to Abandon Crackdown on Tax Havens
http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/politics/A12242-2001May10.html
This Harry Browne voter is discovering that he may have underestimated W.
-------------

The Bush administration plans to curtail an international effort to crack down on tax havens, reversing an initiative backed by the Clinton administration in part because of concerns the effort would lead to higher domestic taxes.

The reversal of U.S. policy is another disappointment for European allies distraught over the new administration's rejection of the Kyoto treaty on global warming and its doubts about the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty.

Barbara Angus, a Treasury Department international tax official, told representatives of the 30-nation Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development that the United States was no longer interested in cooperating on key elements of the OECD's "Harmful Tax Competition" initiative, officials said. Though the American officials say the United States will participate in a more limited effort, U.S. officials acknowledged privately that their move essentially guts the effort.

"The United States does not support efforts to dictate to any country what its own tax rates or tax system should be, and will not participate in any initiative to harmonize world tax systems," Treasury Secretary Paul H. O'Neill said in a statement.

...


SteveH (05/11/01; 12:37:58MT - usagold.com msg#: 53421)
Chalk one up for the Gipper! (protecting gold)
You have a right to a firearm
©Ý2001ÝWorldNetDaily.com

So long as there are idiots out there who are trying to convince people to disarm themselves so they can be maimed or killed by violent criminals, I will fulfill my journalistic duty to remind folks that they don't necessarily have to become a statistic if they don't want to.


You have a constitutional right to own a firearm -- handgun, shotgun, rifle -- if you so choose. And, like all our other rights -- free speech, freedom of religion, the right to avoid self-incrimination -- your right to own a gun cannot be "infringed," taken away, banned, limited, or ignored.


You may not agree with or like Buddhism, Wicca or Islam, but in America you don't have the right to forbid people from observing or practicing those religions.


You may not agree with or like what WorldNetDaily or Rush Limbaugh or Bill Clinton or the New York Times has to say, but you don't have the right to order them to shut down or shut up.


Consequently, you can belong to all the "million mom" or "handgun control" groups you want, but you don't have the right to forbid, limit, or ban persons from buying and owning firearms. It's as much a constitutional right as any other.


Maybe too few people realize this because too few schools provide kids with proper constitutional instruction. I know of and have heard of teachers who badmouth and ridicule the Second Amendment just because they personally don't like guns. Ironically, however, they use their First Amendment right of free speech to trash the Second.


Or maybe it's because too few media pinheads have a clue about the proper constitutional rights and responsibilities of citizens and government alike. I know of lots of journalists who would rather be invited to parties held by anti-liberty minded politicians than remind their readers of their right to own a firearm.


Or maybe it's because too many communities ban or severely restrict access to guns while too many judges and lawmakers let these communities get by with it. I know of lots of local big fish who are of the mind that they should be dictators of their own little domain and should have the right to restrict gun rights (and others) at their leisure or whim.


But whatever the reason, the one irrefutable fact of the matter is this: Americans do now and have always had the right to "keep and bear arms," because our Constitution says we can -- and there isn't a damned thing gun opponents can do about it.


Or rather, there shouldn't be anything they can do about it. Far too many federal, state and local politicians and judges are just as anti-gun, all-controlling and hypocritical about the Constitution and the rights it guarantees we the people.


Oddly, they will let kids view pornography on the Internet but are against letting a 100-pound woman carry a gun in her purse so she can defend herself against a 220-pound male rapist.


My guess is if more lawmakers and judges were attacked, beaten or raped, they'd suddenly "see the wisdom" of the Second Amendment. I'm not advocating that, mind you, but unless you've been in that kind of situation, it's very easy to deny others the right to defend themselves -- especially if you're personally surrounded with a boatload of armed personal bodyguards or cops.


People should understand that while some anti-gun advocates really believe what they are doing is right, their efforts to make sure you're unarmed are inherently more dangerous to you than guns themselves.


Criminals love helpless, hapless victims. Always have, always will; the more helpless, the better.


Consequently, the more gun control laws anti-gunners convince lawmakers to pass and judges to uphold, the more violence and deaths our society will suffer because lawbreaking maniacs don't care much about laws -- against guns or anything else -- in the first place.


The cardinal rule of safety that you should follow is this: You should never let someone who is not responsible for you determine what's best for your personal safety.


Also, even if you don't like guns you shouldn't be willing to accept limitations or bans on them because sooner or later, somebody will get around to limiting or banning other constitutional rights you do "approve" of.


If anti-gun proponents want to disarm themselves, tell everyone they see that they're disarmed and post a sign in their front yard that says, "Don't worry -- I don't have a gun," that's their business. And their right.


But if any group or politician seeks to infringe upon, limit or ban the "right to keep and bear arms," remind them they have no "right" to do so. You can use your First Amendment right of government redress to do the reminding, as well as your constitutional right to vote.


Jon E. Dougherty is a staff reporter and columnist for WorldNetDaily, and author of the special report, "Election 2000: How the Military Vote Was Suppressed."


Old Yeller (05/11/01; 12:12:50MT - usagold.com msg#: 53420)
Trouble in bond land
http://www.prudentbear.com/boards/user/non-frames/message.asp?forumid=4&messageid=46308&threadid=46308

Interesting comments on the state of the credit markets and the implications of the ECB flip-flop.


Seeker of the Grail (05/11/01; 11:41:25MT - usagold.com msg#: 53419)
CoBra(too)
CoBra(too).....I thank you.

Seeker


ORO (05/11/01; 11:34:14MT - usagold.com msg#: 53418)
HBM - not Big Float
Sorry not to have touched on this yet, I did not speak of the process of the return of Big Float. I believe you are right, and have said so before. I will eventually get to discussing this in more detail.

I will only note for the moment that the process has started; each EU bank of size has purchased a US bank, Deutche Tel. (part owned by the German gov) just bought a US company, French Company Lyonaise des Aux bought US entertainment, as Bertelsman has been doing for years on end, Daimler bought our lemon producer Chrystler, and much urban US real estate is developed with French and German money. They are buying income producing investment assets, however, and not so much "stuff", indicating that they are not negative on the US economy and the prospects of converting US derived dollar income into Euro.



ORO (05/11/01; 11:19:11MT - usagold.com msg#: 53417)
Gresham - of Triffin and merchantilism

The practitioners of mercantilism are more often gilds and unions, as they had supplanted merchants, industrialists, and financiers to great extent in the practice of protecting exports, local manufacture, and "jobs" at everyone else's expense. Merchants, industrialists, and financiers, having already enjoyed protected status can not find further growth in it, and had been pressing for a freeing up of the markets so that they can seek new markets to sell into and buy from - where new advantage may come. Protectionism is only beneficial if it is practiced exclusively for your favor. When over about 1/4 of an economy is "protected", the benefits of protection are lost, since "everyone" has it.

Think of protectionism as a new business idea with a company providing "protectionism" services (through appropriate bribery of officials, infomercials, and PR, etc.). Since economic growth comes from specialization and capital investment, and protectionism is the prevention of specialization by restriction of trade among specialists, it has to be a negative sum game. It confers on its beneficiaries less than the cost to the rest of the people. The first to buy a Protectionism Inc. service package raise prices till they have higher profits, which they must spend or reinvest. Their employees, also seeing that there is no competition to their product, go on strike for a greater slice of the pie, which they get because there are no alternative places for the "protected" industry to get their products. Thus the profits disappear a few years into the future. Consumers see the higher cost of the "protected" goods and some stop using them, while others pay the higher price. The higher prices for the "protected" goods cause expenditures on other items to drop. The still competing industries see their product prices drop, fire workers in order to cut costs, stop investment because of the low returns, and thus complain of "dumping" and "anti competitive" foreign "subsidies, tariffs and regulations". The advantages of subscribing to Protectionism Inc. services become clear and sales are brisk initially as "unprotected" workers help Protectionism Inc.'s PR business for free. But the next group of companies to sign on find that their product prices could not be raised in the proportion that the first one's did, and find that some of their suppliers have done the same, thus raising their costs as well. The first adopter's profits continue to decline as more suppliers jump on the protectionism bandwagon, and their workers demand more pay, and less work time, forcing the "protected" company into lower profits. The return from Protectionism Inc. services falls, the economy goes into recession as prices rise, investment halts, and finally no returns are available at all (this is the first leg of the great depression), and Protectionism Inc. finds revenues falling rapidly, and their own profits gone, they proceed then to go out of business.

At this point, the politically derived advantage most easily recognizable to a corporation now is to be allowed to have imports from plants it builds overseas in order to force its workers to compete. Soon after, other businesses start importing their own products and compete with the formerly protected businesses, relative prices drop, sales grow according to merit, and investment revives together with economic growth. (see Europe during the convergence period when tariffs fell and internal cross border trade in Europe grew 3 fold in the 70s, and another 3 fold in the 80s and 90s -- at least till 97).

In growing economies, where there is no existing business in the first place, protectionism serves to assure higher profits to the investors that are to found the industries - and thus attract investment. These join other companies (both local and foreign) coming in to the emerging market in other industries. People are found to be saving prodigiously because of the high return protected industries offer, and the high prices for their products (essentially they are pushed out of the market for products and into the world of investment). Since other economies try to do the same thing, the international market place becomes crowded with over-investment, and those that enjoy it are the countries where tariffs are low (US).

Profits from export businesses decline as more of the potential labor force in the emerging economy participates, and labor costs rise. Also, the competition in the unprotected markets becomes fierce, and prices fall, and with it profitability. At this point, the emerging markets have matured and further profit for local industry can only come from local consumption growth. However, getting consumption to grow substantially requires prices relative to labor income to drop, which would only happen if the economy dismantles protectionism and allows its weaker companies to go under and their employees to find work in retailing and local distribution. Opposition to this would be fierce by unions and corporations enjoying exclusive charter for their products, but eventually governments will see that the only way to get out of the crissis and strife is to let down protectionist barriers so that competition will drop local prices relative to labor and thus improve everyone's lot (and calm down the stress, not to speak of getting reelected). If they don't do this, like Japan decided, then a short period of high accumulation of foreign assets is followed by a long period of stagnation, as corporations aim to preserve foreign market share by building production outside their home markets (where labor is expensive), after which the local powers may finally come to their senses. We are approaching this today.

The Triffin deficit issue grows with the extent of "protected" growth in emerging markets exports, which had attracted foreign investment in the form of loans denominated in reserve currency, by artificially raising return on investment in the emerging market countries. As with any other cases of artificially motivated investment, the result is over-investment, as high returns of the past turn into negative returns later on. Pressed by the need to repay foreign currency debt, the already low return companies exert a pull on reserve currency supply from its issuer, and their governments support them by assisting in lowering local wages relative to export product prices through currency devaluation. Since the peak in outstanding international loans to Asian emerging markets in 1996-7 at $1.4 trillion, they have come down to $0.6 trillion by the end of 2000, and probably will hit bottom soon at about $0.4-$0.5 trillion about equal to their projected reserves by end 2001. At this point, the dollar should be ready to devalue there, unless oil prices rise while they remain denominated in dollars, which would raise demand for dollar reserves. If oil can be paid for in Euro (or Yen) the Triffin deficit will shift to these countries where industries will hollow out, trade deficits burgeon exponentially, and reserves will be wiped out in under one decade while import price inflation in the US wipes out what little trust the dollar retains at home (much less than people say they have and why empty nester boomers have 3 empty bedrooms and a Rec room stuffed with unused exercise equipment).


Buena Fe (05/11/01; 11:15:17MT - usagold.com msg#: 53416)
boom boom
C'mon everyone...........LOOK AT THE T-BONDS........they're gettin smoked! They generally lead these crisises. Greespan can only lower rates as long as he has "favorable perception" in his pocket.........looks to me like he's loosin it........dow crash by May 31st?........any takers.

Auspec.......help me out here.......we're gettin to serious for everyones wellbeing!


Mr Gresham (05/11/01; 11:12:42MT - usagold.com msg#: 53415)
Robert Mundell on "Uses and Abuses of Gresham's Law in the History of Money"
http://www.columbia.edu/~ram15/grash.html
This looks like a fun read -- I remember pulling it up and almost getting to it two years ago.

After seeing this, maybe I oughta change my name to Theognis (Greek elegiac poet who first expressed G's Law), but I'd want to find out who "his beloved Cyrnus" is first. Also, Aristophanes was in on the story, too, but we already have -- still, I hope -- an "Ari" amongst us.

Mundell: "The correct expression of Gresham's Law is: "cheap money drives out dear, if they exchange for the same price." That proposition is neither trivial nor obvious."

Actually, the more I scan Mundell's paper, the more dangerously pulled in I get. I think this might be the "Read of the Day." He touches on so much about the transition from gold to paper, and has a section titled "The Breaking Point."

Now I'm going to be a good Friday-catch-up worker, and close all my browser windows, and get out of here.





Hill Billy Mitchell (05/11/01; 10:47:21MT - usagold.com msg#: 53414)
ORO @ # 53410

Sir I believe you missed my point completely.

I was referring to the USD's that are not in circulation. The USD's, which are held in reserve by central banks, will cease to be good for reserve and will be spent. The money will be spent on every imaginable hard asset located in the United States. It will be gotten rid of at the rate at which Germans got rid of the paper Marks. Why will "Big Float" cease to float? Why will the USD be repatriated? The answer is very simple. Before times eternal, the Almighty designed a law to prevent this fiat fraud. He put teeth in the law. The law is called Gresham's Law, simply because it was brought to our attention by John Gresham. The law has its own teeth. The law is defied at peril. The law is immutable because it was established by the One who created the Sun, the object of many worshippers in this world. The One who established the law is the second immutable entity in this discussion.

You seem to put forth that the USD's circulating in our nation are not the same USD's that lie in central bank reserves. If they are different dollars not subject to future spending please explain. Should the US strike new money it will affect the USD's held in reserve by the nations of the world. This is a guarantee. It will mean war with bullets and ICBM'S if the banks are forced to simply write of their USD reserves.

Give me a break. I acknowledge your genius. You could at least acknowledge my common sense.

Respectfully,

HBM


Hill Billy Mitchell (05/11/01; 10:12:34MT - usagold.com msg#: 53413)
Mr Gresham @ # 53407
Sir,

The following was in quotes in your post:

"Overall debt to cash flow levels in the EU are far lower than they are in the US, but on the other hand, much US household debt is not intended as borrowing so much as it is a hedge against the dollar." End of quote.

Were you saying this or are you quoting ORO or someone else? I take exception to the statement no matter who has said it. American households have been borrowing money hand over fist since the 1993 approximate. It has been debt of little purpose other than consumption. Our nation of household borrowers has been borrowing for current consumption, period. They have generally bought the "lie" that inflation is relatively tame. They have been borrowing simply because they want consume that which they have not produced. That has been their motive, period.

The tide is changing of course and some will and have begun to borrow to hedge against inflation. They are feeling it in the "non-core" purchases that they make. These purchases are "big-time". They represent a goodly portion of their disposable income and they are feeling the pinch. I have my own definition of disposable income but should probably call it "spendable cash".

Let us define it now: Spendable cash = Income after taxes and debt service (including principle and interest). Because of the long-term growth in household debt (grew tremendously 1985 - 1989, I think. Then it took off again in 1993 approximate and may just now beginning to subside, though it is too early to tell.

I see strong indications that many are putting up the last of the equity in their personal residences, not to borrow more money but to roll it over into a smaller debt service situation (lower interest and longer term) in order to increase their "spendable cash" over time. This is the last straw for them and when this inflation reality begins to squeeze the little room they have found by mortgaging their homes, i.e. this new "spendable cash" begins to be used up by the climb in monthly "non-core" expenditures. The final state will be borrowing to hedge against inflation the way I did when I was a child. (Circa 1974 thru 1981)

From personal experience I know that when one gets in at this late stage in the liquidation cycle, they will lose all that they have and they will find themselves bankrupt. When this happened to me I spent the next seven years liquidating my debt and living like a pauper. Never again for me.

I fear that we have a different animal today. I doubt that many will live like paupers just to pay what they owe. They will file bankruptcy instead.

Now back to this, "borrowing as a hedge against the dollar". What is the psychology here? It is buying real estate, and other hard assets through debt on the bet that the debt will be paid off with cheaper dollars in the not too distant future. If personal income rises and the debt is fixed, then again we have more "spendable income" assuming taxes do not increase to eat it up.

You do not hear much about borrowing to hedge against inflation like we did in the mid to late '70's. This may be coming in the near future but it is not here yet. When that happens those who get in the game and have no savings and no job guarantees will hit the soup line in short order. We are nearing the end.

It is ludicrous to say that the household debt which has accumulated in the last 7-8 years can be characterized in this way: -..."much US household debt is not intended as borrowing so much as it is a hedge against the dollar."

Very respectfully,

HBM


PH in LA (05/11/01; 09:52:22MT - usagold.com msg#: 53412)
Fiat legal tender vs abolishment of futures markets by fiat

"This note is legal tender for all debts public and private"

So sayeth every FRN used in commerce. This is a topic that has been elucidated here at great length... even and especially by ORO himself. Yet he allows himself to become enraged by "the presence of monetary boobs in their midst, which try and make debt and contract denominated in gold impossible by government fiat."

Now, one supposes that any legal system that specifies that gold interest can be settled with any "note (which) is legal tender for all debts public and private" that no contract could be enforced in gold. Does this mean the abolishment of gold as a monetary instrument? Are all gold transactions thereby abolished? All except the futures market, complete with its attendant dishonest over-subscription to control the POG in the face of obvious overprinting of notes. A contradiction which does not seem to enrage ORO at all.

Why accept the abolution of all honest transactions involving gold (the purchase of a house by the tendering of gold, for example) and at the same time lob ICBMs at any "monetary boob" that suggests abolishing the futures trade of paper promises?

ORO, even to this observer's amaturish understanding, in spite of your obviously highly committed and ambitious studies, you have bootstrapped yourself into an extremely illogical position here.


CoBra(too) (05/11/01; 09:41:24MT - usagold.com msg#: 53411)
Seeker - BOE AU Auction
Tuesday May 15 - new series reduced from 25t to 20 tons.

Cheers cb2


ORO (05/11/01; 09:21:44MT - usagold.com msg#: 53410)
Gresham, HBM - Gresham's law
For the umpteenth time, here it is in a nut shell:

1. Good money drives out the bad.
Good money is found circulating in daily trade. Denominating contract and debt.
Only small amounts are hoarded.

2. When trading at par, bad money drives out the good till par is broken.
Bad money circulates in daily trade and no good money is seen changing hands in the market place.
Bad money denominates most debt and contract. (My own addition: but for the portion of future income that is to be saved and not re-invested or spent, which is contracted into good money)
Most of the good money is hoarded.

The imposition of par between good money and bad is the work of government. Many a king has put out a chit that says in big letters and pictures "this is gold". When these were discounted to their value as kindling, kings had found tireless entrepreneurs to attempt marketing this sort of money and had given charter to them for that purpose, in return for the crown getting a share of the profit.


Aristotle, in his many posts had relied on the second part of Gresham's law without understanding the first part, and without considering the precondition for "bad money drives out the good" is that they trade at par. Furthermore, neither he nor anyone else here has played with the possibility of multiple good moneys circulating in different places and at different layers of monetary and economic activity, with no par imposed by king nor judge, but by the fact of their being good moneys in the eye of the markets - the people.


Seeker of the Grail (05/11/01; 09:03:28MT - usagold.com msg#: 53409)
BOE Auction?
Dear Sirs,

Would anyone be able to tell me when the date of the next BOE auction please and thanks.

May your chalice overflow,

SOTG


Goldfly (05/11/01; 08:50:06MT - usagold.com msg#: 53408)
Leigh...
LOL!

I think that's him over there, disguised as a bear...

or is it a dog?


Mr Gresham (05/11/01; 08:48:45MT - usagold.com msg#: 53407)
Oro, HBM
Thanks -- you make it worth showing up for "work" in the morning.

Oro -- So your take admits of tension between EU and ECB goals and powers...only TWT.

"Overall debt to cash flow levels in the EU are far lower than they are in the US, but on the other hand, much US household debt is not intended as borrowing so much as it is a hedge against the dollar."

Good insight; Americans don't even know they're doing it, do they? Debtors and creditors jockeying for advantage, even in their post-NAZ-bubble "sleep". Euro debt will go through the same growth cycle, until it uses up its advantage. I don't think FOA is advertising any everlasting principles here, just relative present advantages (even allowing for some of the weaknesses you point out?).

Re: Triffin (always a good mental warm-up to bring that one back into discussion). It occurs to me that dollar support from Europe (and Asia) might reflect internal power holders in the export industries holding sway over their CBs policies, to support their own earnings over the standard of living of their countrymen. Mercantilism forever, no? Their focused political power outweighs the dispersed influence of the masses. So when does that dam break, if ever? Your take?

HBM -- it seems that Gresham's Law, to the small extent I understand it, HAS been working these past 78 years. Dollar is out there circulating, gold in hiding, due to official governmental decree or action. In freer markets, they would find more proper levels of exchange, and would then circulate more interchangeably. I'm sure Oro could add more dimension to this half-formed thought of mine.

BTW, my handle was formed when I was imagining Y2k bank runs, and wondering if the over-printed $100 bills would trade at a discount once people had drained their accounts, while relatively sparse $1 bills would fetch a premium. Had a long way to go then as a gold newbie...







Econoclast (05/11/01; 08:36:00MT - usagold.com msg#: 53406)
Beesting--"...and the majority of taxpayers understood
what is talked about on this forum..."

When I read the above quote, I was hit with a pain of sadness, because a century ago, a large percentage of Americans DID have a much more intimate knowledge of gold and how their monetary system worked. The FED fiat, and gaining its acceptance, was the grand experiment (and a huge success) in the dumbing down of the population.
I sincerely hope for all our descendants sake, that the bull era in government is coming to an end as ORO says.
A major rant about my government is trying to escape my fingers. I'll hit the submit button instead.


ORO (05/11/01; 08:16:02MT - usagold.com msg#: 53405)
Gresham - Randy - countertrends

The EU contains counter purposes and counter trends, more so than other organizations, because of the complex mix of traditions and competing political forces. The ECB is a technocratic organization which includes some relatively good economists that seem to be Monetarists and Fisherian classics (what little I know of both schools seems to indicate this). The EU governments are much less responsive to their people than the state houses in the US. The plus side of that is in not pursuing wrong headed policies in the momentary heat of public opinion. The negative side is that the governments of Europe are more attune to their own wishes and fashions than to the people.

The ECB stands in a counter trend to the far left Brussels bureacracy and the member governments. The member governments are acting through the EU system to eliminate competition among themselves while the ECB and EMU is pressing them into the practicalities of competition through lower taxes and more lax regulation, particularly of employment rules and government controlled companies. So far there is no clarity as to who is gaining the upper hand.

Issing does dis the Keynesian approach of attempting a fine tuning of the economy through monetary and fiscal policy, recognizing that even if it were possible it would have never been implemented correctly because of the uncertain nature of the future which the policy makers are to consider. He warns against "political cartels" yet that was the political driving force for forming the EU. Will he ever see his jurisdictional competition actually come about? I think so, but only after cartelization attempts fail because of the time factors: governments must react more quickly to the competitive pressures, more quickly than cartel negotiations can proceed.

My jury is out on which direction we will see prevail.

Issing talks of the mid term purchasing power stability of the Euro as the target of ECB policy. Nice target, but will they be able to do so without economic convulsions? There is no reason to believe its particular targets for CPI and monetary growth are achievable with a consistent "mid term" economic growth. Overall debt to cash flow levels in the EU are far lower than they are in the US, but on the other hand, much US household debt is not intended as borrowing so much as it is a hedge against the dollar.

Some of you may remember my references to "Triffin's dilemma" where the use of a national fiat currency for the reserve functions causes its issuer to fall into perpetual trade deficits. His observation holds for Europe and the Euro as it most obviously did for the US and the dollar in Triffin's time (he wrote of the experience of the 50s). This same observation was repeated often, and loudly, by Rueff and de Gaulle, who talked of it as "deficits without tears". If Europe is to see its currency used as a reserve, displacing some of the dollar's function, then it must experience the same effect of growing trade deficits or let the Euro fall to the level at which the trade deficit disappears. In order for the Euro to grow in international circulation outside its home, expatriate euro must be created (borrowed into existence) abroad and used to buy EU goods, which would raise internal EU prices. If the new borrowing goes to finance purchases from elsewhere, then the Euro would decline in exchange value and could only recover if reabsorbed through subsequent exports out of the EU. During the necessary preliminary period while Euro reserves grow, the Euro would suffer in exchange value as foreign debtors print up fresh Euro which still have no substantial external foreign debt market to absorb supply.

The only way to advance Euro ownership abroad without facing Triffin's dilemma is to have a neutral cash component, an asset -- like gold - which the ECB can buy from its holders around the world in return for printing Euros. Euros would then be an international currency without a geographic and political home. But here is the rub; why would anyone hold Euros rather than the gold itself, and use the gold for trade (including debt and contract denomination)? FOA has put out the answer Eurocratia and Islamic anti-usurers came up with (clear evidence of the presence of monetary boobs in their midst, Randy) which is to try and make debt and contract denominated in gold impossible by government fiat. Meaning that they have the gall to call a system of restrictions on people's judgments "freegold". How is that for dialectics? The concept is sheer intellectual fraud.


Mr Gresham (05/11/01; 07:56:29MT - usagold.com msg#: 53404)
Bill Murphy text
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gata/message/757
now, off to read it...

Leigh (05/11/01; 06:43:19MT - usagold.com msg#: 53403)
Mr. Greenspan on the Gold Trail
Gee, Cavan Man, I must have MISSED seeing Mr. Greenspan walking the Gold Trail with us! Silly me! Here, let me ask Reg Howe if he's spotted Mr. Greenspan on the Gold Trail. He MUST be in disguise.

Cavan Man (05/11/01; 06:39:06MT - usagold.com msg#: 53402)
Trail Guide
Sir: "Alan" walks the trail with US, yes?

Cavan Man (05/11/01; 06:37:47MT - usagold.com msg#: 53401)
ECB Rate Cut
I believe their miserly and token .25 had more to do with the situation in Britain (.25 also) where Mr. Blair has called for an early election and is intending upon a full court press to engage the Euro.

Also, I'd guess there will be another FED cut next week. I think Mr. Greenspan's message was "we're not done yet and we need your support". Even as he walks the Trail with us and understands the endgame, he points out to his companions (along the Trail) the necessity of gradual transition so as to keep the US from experiencing too much pain. A wounded US economy will soon recover but there is no intention to inflict mortal damage. That's their game.


Hill Billy Mitchell (05/11/01; 06:13:04MT - usagold.com msg#: 53400)
ORO @ # 53394
Sir ORO

It is good to see a little bit of "umph" in your posts. I am not interested in "who", is right or wrong, but I am certainly interest in the opinions and positions of those who put some conviction into their efforts. As for you and TC and FOA, I agree with all three of you some of the time, some of you some of the time, but I would be a fool to agree with any of you all the time. These "upper level disturbances", have been healthy for this forum. Let us all take off the gloves, show some conviction, be willing to make a mistake and admit it later. Let us learn.

May I comment on a portion of your post?

___________________________________

Begin quote


"Fiat - particularly the fiat reserve system created in Bretton Woods, and who's legacy we live with - creates a differential between different size countries. The largest economic unit will have the greatest volumes of bilateral trade, thus in order to avoid many currency conversions, many industries and banks among the trade partners will maintain balances in the large country's currency, while the large country needs only little of its multiple trade partner's currencies on hand, because everyone has the large country's currency. Furthermore, the traders with people of the large country will want to denominate output supply and input provision contracts in the same currency. Thus all countries end up trading predominantly in the currency of the largest economy even for the bulk of trade among themselves. It is the liquidity preference effect."

End of quote
___________________________________

It seems to me that the time will come and is very near when "Mr. Gresham's" law will be enforced. A law that cannot be enforced is not a law. If God made the law it will be enforced. If God did not make the law then our wonderful friend on the forum will have to change his handle.

I know you are busy with your special project and that you are plowing new acreage for us (hard work), but could you please comment upon this, the prospect of the final rejection of the USD due to its bad money nature. I feel that repatriation is just months away and two to three years on the outside. What is called "Big Float" will float no more, as the world knows it.

One other question, please. I have a strong conviction that shared reserve status will not work and smooth transition from the USD to the Euro is not in the cards. Could you please comment on this, maybe not just now but at some point in the future when your gloves are off.

Very respectfully,

HBM


Hill Billy Mitchell (05/11/01; 05:26:28MT - usagold.com msg#: 53399)
SHIFTY @ # 53395
Sir Shifty,

Thanks for the excerpt (warning)

A new logo called a gold mark will include a circular motif intended to symbolise the sun, and advertisements for the metal will end with the slogan "glow with gold"..."so we are appealing to the emotional and spiritual values associated with gold", says WGC chief executive.

So their idea of spiritual values has to do with is sun worship. If the coin bears the slogan, "In God We Trust", we can be sure that the trusted god to which they alude is Isis.

Hate is love, war is peace, wrong is right, gold is a barbarous relic, silver is plentiful, polytheism is monotheism.

I just couldn't remain silent on this one. No apology for this outburst.

HBM


Saxulum^ (05/11/01; 04:03:30MT - usagold.com msg#: 53398)
Black Blade msg# 53393 Confidence Dilemma - API or EIA?
Black Blade msg# 53393
Confidence Dilemma - API or EIA?

FWIW
In the Netherlands gasoline prices at the pump have just reached an all time high.
One of the reasons according to Royal Dutch Shell, was massive GASOLINE buying from the US.
So it seems US is using the EU refinery capacity as well, driving our already heavy taxed prices through the roof. Great help to keep Euro inflation (and thus interest) high... .?!?

Cheers and Thanks for all yr great input



Netking (05/11/01; 03:42:55MT - usagold.com msg#: 53397)
Greenspan in . . . .Charge!
http://www.gold-eagle.com/editorials_01/willettalway051101.html
Beyond a shadow of a doubt, that the Fed will cut interest rates on, or before, the FOMC meeting on May 15. Perhaps more importantly, the jobs report hardened the belief that this economy will soon turn around because the historical parallels are now backing the bull. As an example, on the front page of Bloomberg on Friday an article read "Stocks in U.S. Gain as Jobs Report Fails to Dent Profit Optimism." Within the article read:

"During the last recession, the economy bottomed in the fourth quarter of 1990, when U.S. gross domestic product fell by 3.2 percent. Unemployment didn't peak until June 1992, when the jobless rate touched 7.8 percent.
In the 18 months from the bottom of the recession through the peak of unemployment, the S&P 500 posted an annualized return of 19 percent."

It is these types of historical accounts that fuel the popular adages such as 'don't fight the Fed', 'buy the dips', and 'hold for the long term'. In sum, the belief that the 'worst is over' was present last Monday, and remained the overriding theme until Friday. As for the Bloomberg perspective, the comparisons to today are chosen carefully.



Netking (5/11/01; 02:46:40MT - usagold.com msg#: 53396)
Clinton media "red out"
http://dailynews.muzi.com/ll/english/1069952.shtml
Excerpt: "...Strains" in the US-China relationship have prompted the Chinese leadership to throw a news blackout over Clinton's visit with no coverage of Clinton's arrival in the country in the Chinese media.

Few people on Shanghai's streets knew the former US president had touched down on the mainland.

Clinton's talks with President Jiang Zemin in Hong Kong Wednesday were also played down in the Chinese media, which carried no pictures of the event and only a few lines saying the meeting had taken place..."
------------------------------------------------------------
The "stress" really began with the revelation that the Chinese had breached security at the Los Alamos nuclear weapons plant and the fact that the Chinese had funneled money into the democratic presidnetial campaign in 1996 and it hasn't stopped since. To date China has nearly 300 missiles capable of threatening Taiwan, I say sell 'em the Aegis class destroyers.


SHIFTY (5/11/01; 02:05:02MT - usagold.com msg#: 53395)
Yeah right this should do it.
http://globalarchive.ft.com/globalarchive/articles.html?id=010511001409&query=gold
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMY: Gold to play on warm image as the 'new cool'
Financial Times; May 11, 2001
By RICHARD TOMKINS



The World Gold Council yesterday set out to give gold's lacklustre image a makeover by launching a Dollars 55m (Pounds 38m) marketing campaign that will play on the metal's "warmth".

A new logo called a gold mark will include a circular motif intended to symbolise the sun, and advertisements for the metal will end with the slogan "glow with gold".

Branding experts hope to reverse gold's down-market drift by convincing the fashion-conscious that the cold, detached minimalism of recent years is out and that warm, sensuous richness is back in.

Advertisements will build on the idea that "warm" is the "new cool", contrasting the cold, stark, heroin-chic images of recent years with what the gold council claims is today's desire for a more positive and meaningful lifestyle.

Haruko Fukuda, the gold council's chief executive, said people's values today had more to do with the joy and happiness derived from human experiences than with owning material things, "so we are appealing to the emotional and spiritual val ues associated with gold".

The council, which represents gold producers, is launching the campaign in the hope of increasing demand for the metal and lifting the price from the trough into which it has sunk.

From a peak of Dollars 835 a troy ounce in 1980, the price has been well under Dollars 300 an ounce for more than a year.

Central banks have contributed to the decline by off-loading some of their holdings on to the market. But the price has also been hit by a changes in fashion.

In the trend-setting west, cool, understated platinum has become the metal of choice, while gold is often portrayed as ostentatious and vulgar.

Ms Fukuda said about 80 per cent of the world's gold went into jewellery, so this would be the focus of the marketing effort. Council members have agreed to fund the Dollars 55m campaign by doubling their membership fees.

The council has hired Wolff Olins as its brand consultant, Bartle Bogle Hegarty as its advertising agency and Edelman Public Relations Worldwide as its PR consultant.

Some advertisements will start running in the US, the UK and Italy next month, but the campaign will intensify in the third and fourth quarters of this year.



ORO (5/11/01; 00:44:59MT - usagold.com msg#: 53394)
Randy - economic sovereignty
The point of the matter is not that one country has less sovereignty with gold, but that ALL countries share the same lack of economic sovereignty. This makes for governments large and small having to serve the market's preferences. Actions of the people all around the globe who have something to sell something to buy dictate interest rates, prices, etc. - because people trade, not governments and not countries.

Free Gold Money puts the individual on a par with his government. Government must pay the market interest rate just like you do.

Fiat - particularly the fiat reserve system created in Bretton Woods, and who's legacy we live with - creates a differential between different size countries. The largest economic unit will have the greatest volumes of bilateral trade, thus in order to avoid many currency conversions, many industries and banks among the trade partners will maintain balances in the large country's currency, while the large country needs only little of its multiple trade partner's currencies on hand, because everyone has the large country's currency. Furthermore, the traders with people of the large country will want to denominate output supply and input provision contracts in the same currency. Thus all countries end up trading predominantly in the currency of the largest economy even for the bulk of trade among themselves. It is the liquidity preference effect.

The large country will manage its currency for its domestic purposes, and thus interest rates and money supply growth rates set in the large country dictate what happens in the smaller countries, as rates fall to the floor because of a slow down in the large country, the small ones may skyrocket into hyperactivity. As the large country tightens credit in order to avoid emerging price inflation from escalating, the small countries undergo a fall off a cliff recession. That is what economic sovereignty is about.

In the international gold standard there was no such condition, each economy's effects were proportional to their economies as a whole, not only the internationaly tradeable portion that can earn foreign exchange.

The picture is not that one sided, however, as international trade has grown in size 10 fold in Asia over 20 years to over $1 trillion each way ($2 tril together) and with the rest of the world's trade having grown to a total approaching the size of US GDP, the pull of the aggregate of the smaller countries had grown larger, and their deflationary conditions clear big chunks of the monetary base out of the US through our trade deficit, they are also pulling lower short term interest rates (Eurodollar rates). Now we have a roughly equal pull of the US economy and the rest of the world. Thus the Fed's interest rate games will have less of an effect abroad than before.

A sharing of the reserve function with Europe breaks with the liquidity preference rule, thus one of them must remain on the sidelines. But both the US and Europe are too small to provide the world with a stable reserve system based on internal targeting of monetary policy.



Black Blade (5/11/01; 00:25:47MT - usagold.com msg#: 53393)
Confidence Dilemma - API or EIA?
The problem with the API and EIA petroleum inventory data. These data are more recent than that I posted a couple of hours ago. But this data also demonstrates the difficulty of interpretation as here is an industry research group American Petroleum Institute (API), and a government research group within the Department of Energy, the Energy Information Administration (EIA).

The API inventory numbers show a downward movement in crude oil stocks during the week ending May 4. The EIA however reported an increase. According to the API, crude oil inventories decreased 0.3 million barrels. The EIA reported an increase of 0.6 million barrels. Estimates of distillate stocks decreased this week according to the API but increased according to the EIA. The API reported a decrease of 1.0 million barrels, while the EIA reported an increase of 0.3 million barrels. Inventories of motor gasoline increased by 1.1 million barrels according to the API, while the EIA reported an increase of 1.2 million barrels in inventory. Reformulated gasoline stocks increased by 1.2 million barrels according to the EIA. The gasoline data are closely watched for the main summer driving season. Refinery utilization decreased by 0.5 percentage points to 98.3% according to the EIA, indicating that refiners continue to operate at full capacity.

Refineries running at full capacity, where any disruption including the probability of breakdowns and outages will severely crimp supply. The low gasoline inventories are still about 3.5% below their level one year ago, any refinery outage will obviously result in regional price spikes. Refiners can not substitute one blend of gasoline due to varying regional EPA requirements. This is especially true of California and the Midwest. It's not easy being green, but it sure is a whole lot more expensive.

- Black Blade


Black Blade (05/11/01; 00:05:11MT - usagold.com msg#: 53392)
Recession Rolls, but does not Envelop, U.S.
http://www.dismal.com/thoughts/article.asp?aid=1194

Snippit:

The U.S. economy avoided recession through the first quarter due to its industrial and regional diversity. Recession is certainly evident, but it is rolling across different industries and regions rather than hitting them all at once.

Black Blade: Rolling recession. Interesting article with nice US map. The "Big Picture" is that ultimately we are all headed in the same direction.





ViewYesterday's Discussion.


Permission to reprint is hereby granted where the USAGOLD name is cited along with our web address, mailing address and phone number. For electronic reproductions, citing the post heading and the http://www.usagold.com/cpmforum/ website address as the source is sufficient.

usa gold coins and bullion
Centennial Precious Metals
Gold coins & bullion since 1973

P.O. Box 460009
Denver, Colorado 80246-0009

We educate first-time investors!

We invite you to contact our trading desk
for quotes and purchase information.

Buy gold in U.S. 1-800-869-5115
Buy gold in EU 00-800-8720-8720

6:00am to 6:00pm MtnTime; Mon-Fri

admin@usagold.com

Remember: It's your purchase of gold from USAGOLD-Centennial Precious Metals that nourishes these pages

Click to verify BBB accreditation and to see a BBB report.

Tuesday January 6
website support: sitemaster@usagold.com
site map - site index
The USAGOLD logo and stylized gold coin pile are trademarks of Michael J. Kosares.
© 1997-2009 Michael J. Kosares / USAGOLD All Rights Reserved