Is Gold Really a Good Hedge?

Bloomberg/Cameron Crise/ 10-10-2017

“Again, on this metric, gold looks pretty good as a risk-aversion hedge. By definition, equity market performance was poor, with an average loss of almost 20 percent per episode. Treasuries proved a useful offset, returning an average 3.4 percent and performing positively on seven occasions. Gold, meanwhile, was a star performer, rising almost 7 percent per episode, with gains in 8 of the 10 periods.”

MK note:  Came across this article over the weekend.  It is nearly a month old, but I thought it important enough to get it posted here for future reference. The author seems reluctant to accept the results of his own research, and ends with an interesting take:  “Given the solid performance of a portfolio including gold and the chance that the comfort of owning some might prevent investors from panicking at the height of a crisis, I have to conclude that the notion of gold as a hedge against serious risk aversion is true.”

Imagine that.  Remaining calm because you appropriately hedged your portfolio against a Wall Street disaster ahead of time. [smile]  The article is worth a read. . . . I might add that the crises listed are mild in comparison to some of the more famous breakdowns in history, i.e., times when gold mattered in an ultimate sense.

This entry was posted in Today's top gold news and opinion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.