Welcome to the USAGOLD Gold Discussion Archives. Looking to buy gold coins and bullion? The archives of this gold discussion forum are a treasure trove of information to educate investors about protecting their wealth through portfolio diversification with private gold ownership. The discussion forum also covers the wider issues of the past, present, and future role of gold in international monetary policy and the dynamics of the modern gold markets. To join the debate request a discussion password here.
The opinions posted by all guests at this forum are expressly their own and do not necessarily represent the views of the management or staff of USAGOLD - Centennial Precious Metals. The hosting of this forum shall therefore not be construed as equivalent to endorsement by USAGOLD - Centennial Precious Metals of any of the opinions posted here.
ARCHIVED DISCUSSION FROM 11/15/2002 All times are U.S. Mountain Time (Yesterday's Discussion.) Operative (11/15/02; 23:26:19MT - usagold.com msg#: 89744) AT&T Latin America May File For Bankruptcy http://quote.bloomberg.com/fgcgi.cgi?ptitle=Top%20Financial%20News&s1=blk&tp=ad_topright_topfin&T=markets_box.ht&s2=ad_right1_topfin&bt=ad_position1_topfin&box=ad_box_all&tag=financial&middle=ad_frame2_topfin&s=APdVpLhVmQVQmVCBM Article states ATT expected 20% growth rates at the start, now looking at going belly up. Operative (11/15/02; 23:18:58MT - usagold.com msg#: 89743) U.S. Halts Oil Shipments to N. Korea http://www.nationalpost.com/world/story.html?id={B1F966F3-CA9C-4256-A2E2-33929731779F} World Events getting crazier by the day. Operative (11/15/02; 23:06:12MT - usagold.com msg#: 89742) Argentina Blames IMF http://www.reuters.com/news_article.jhtml;jsessionid=V0PSMBWNF0H3WCRBAELCFFA?type=worldnews&StoryID=1750324# The saga continues. Operative (11/15/02; 22:00:08MT - usagold.com msg#: 89741) @ timbervision Thank you for providing the correct qoute ( much better) and providing it's author. a nation of one (11/15/02; 21:15:56MT - usagold.com msg#: 89740) or better yet, "The post-bubble markdown of asset returns began just in as the retirement of "baby-boomers" would be directly impacted." timbervision (11/15/02; 21:12:21MT - usagold.com msg#: 89739) Operative Re: post #89720 http://www.quotelady.com/subjects/words.html Here is the quote that you remembered for 30 years. I can't say that I had ever heard it before, but I just took the words that you remembered and applied them to a Google search."If you would be pungent, be brief; for it is with words as with sunbeams--the more they are condensed, the deeper they burn."--Robert Southey a nation of one (11/15/02; 21:11:37MT - usagold.com msg#: 89738) to sector (11/15/02; 10:09:55MT - usagold.com msg#: 89702) You say: "...as bad luck would have it, the retirement of "baby boomers" has commenced at just the point when the post-bubble markdown of asset returns has occurred...."But this is not luck. It is intended.To say the same thing in the reverse order would be more revealing (to use your words, more or less): "Just at the point when the post-bubble markdown of asset returns is occurring, the retirement of "baby-boomers" has commenced." a nation of one (11/15/02; 20:16:41MT - usagold.com msg#: 89737) those poor, frightened people It is beginning to look as if the six point drop on Wednesday was the result of impulsive -and unaware- weak hands. Liberty Head (11/15/02; 19:54:57MT - usagold.com msg#: 89736) Bound Spirit - Roger Arnolds Comments Thanks for the insightful post.It seems that most corporations believe the best way to increase the rate of productivity, is to terminate employees, get rid of the dead wood, so to speak. I see that as treating the symptom, instead of treating the disease. The disease, as I see it, is "Free Market Phobia", which manifests as increasing government control of our countries businesses. Having the government regulate industry is like giving your best huntin' dog tapeworms so the greedy dog won't hunt too much. Every argument I have heard against the free-market is based on fear of unrestricted coruption. I do not believe our government is any less corupt. In matter of fact, I think the coruption level in entities as huge as the free-market vs a government regulated market will always be the same as the population at large. So, the question is, which form responds to coruption most quickly? I think the Enron fiasco makes a great example. When coruption became known, the free-market responded with an immediate withdrawl of funds. Enron was out of business within a very short time. Justice was swift. Bing Badda Boom! It didn't matter if the government regulators were just as corupt as Enron executives.Get rid of government interference in the market place and productivity will float to it's highest level, freely.I don't think a free market economy would tolerate a fiat currency, so ...... Cheers Cavan Man (11/15/02; 19:45:49MT - usagold.com msg#: 89735) WORLD GOLD COUNCIL I met a representative of the WGC in New Orleans recently. Honestly, this gentleman had no more interest in gold than the typical western investor. one of the things he said to me: "A lot of people think gold is going to $800 or better. We don't want to see that. Nobody wants to see that." Cavan Man (11/15/02; 19:41:14MT - usagold.com msg#: 89734) Goldcorp This company is a rare bird in the mining industry. They maintain their product is money. They leverage it as money. They promote it. They market it. They are crazy about it. They love their product and they are telling the world about it!ARE YOU TAKING NOTES PIERRE? TownCrier (11/15/02; 19:15:10MT - usagold.com msg#: 89733) Gilded Opinion addition http://www.usagold.com/gildedopinion/McEwen.html This new addition captures the Mineweb interview with Goldcorp head Rob McEwen along with MK's foreward on the subject of gold scarcity.R. Black Blade (11/15/02; 19:12:48MT - usagold.com msg#: 89732) In Gold We Trust http://www.feer.com/articles/2002/0211_21/p030fcol.html Snippits:Investors once again are seeking value, and traditional "refuge investments" such as gold will be favoured even more, especially if the United States goes to war with Iraq.First, China has set up a gold exchange, the Shanghai Gold Exchange, which started trial operations on October 16.Mainland China, Hong Kong and Taiwan together hold the world's largest amount of U.S. dollar reserves, estimated at over $300 billion. But their gold holding is officially only 3% of all foreign-exchange reserves. By contrast, the European Central Bank's standard is 15%. Thus, the People's Bank Of China is frequently rumoured to be a buyer of gold to raise its holdings, even if it denies it officially.Dubai is establishing a commodities exchange that will start by trading gold early next year. Part of the reason for this development is the Islamic gold dinar, a newly created 100% gold currency which has a weight of 4.3 grams and whose value is based on the metal's international price. Its backers are hoping that the gold dinar will become the currency of more than one billion Muslims, and eventually turn into a rival to the dollar and serve as a reserve currency.America needs to rid itself of excesses in its financial markets. But a way out of this dilemma is if a sharp fall in the value of the dollar were to occur, which would allow America to unwind its imbalances without a double-dip recession. In just such a circumstance, commodities, in particular gold, will benefit. As such, the pressure remains for the price of gold to go up, as investors likely will move some of their dollar holdings into gold bullion--while applying appropriate hedging strategies.Black Blade: A few reasons to hold gold. Gold is selling at bargain prices. ElGordo (11/15/02; 18:58:18MT - usagold.com msg#: 89731) Silver lease rates turning up http://www.kitco.com/charts/s_leaserates.html A weaker US Dollar will eventually lead to higher inflation.Everything seems to be falling into place for PMs. Golden Bear (11/15/02; 18:40:24MT - usagold.com msg#: 89730) Weakest Link... by Doug Nolan http://www.prudentbear.com/creditbubblebulletin.asp "...It is also worth noting the $1.44 billion loss reported this week by Credit Suisse, a major player in asset-backs (National Century's investment banker!) and U.S. "structured finance" generally. But they are only one of an expanding number of troubled foreign financial institutions operating in U.S. financial markets. It is today important to appreciate that the big international financial conglomerates became major U.S. Credit Bubble operators. They are now beginning to suffer the consequences. It is our view that it was these and other leveraged speculators that played the instrumental role in what was the painless recycling of increasingly massive U.S. current account deficits ("Bubble Dollars") back to the U.S. Credit system. Evidence of their key role is found by scanning the list of borrowers in one's money market fund, while also pondering the quality of assets underpinning hundreds of "funding corps" managed by these same institutions (and held in huge quantities by the money fund complex). It is also worth noting that the recently released Shared National Credit Review of U.S. syndicated bank loans stated that 45% of these Credits were held by foreign-sourced institutions. This is a problem, and their problem is our problem. As we have written repeatedly, there is a lot of bad paper out there somewhere. Whether it is large amount of poor Credits extended or their over-enthusiasm for the fledgling Credit default swaps, foreign players acquired enormous U.S. Credit risk as they aggressively played the Great Credit Bubble. How much of this risk lies hidden in American investment portfolios (in funding corps, special purpose vehicles and elsewhere) – and how much of this risk has been re-insured by the U.S. Credit insurers, Banks, GE and others – only time will tell. However, one way or the other, these unfolding Credit losses are quite likely a critical Weak Link. Despite this week's curious bid to acquire Household International, we would now expect that, on the margin, the reeling foreign financial conglomerates will attempt a quiet retreat from the faltering U.S. Bubble. If so, this will prove a seminal development for the Great Credit Bubble and its twin, the Bubble dollar. Again repeating previous analysis, "As goes structured finance, so goes the dollar." And if, as we expect, the dollar proves a Weak Link, Dr. Greenspan's inflationary goals become more challenging and considerably more risky..."--------------------------------------------------------GB: "A lot of bad paper out there somewhere" How many 401k's and dreams are going to implode when this bad paper comes out of hiding.... Bound Spirit (11/15/02; 18:07:57MT - usagold.com msg#: 89729) Roger Arnolds Daily Observations I've waited all day for someone to share todays thoughts from Roger Arnold. I guess one of these day's I'm going to have to start helping with some of the heavy lifting others do around here that make lurking possible for sloths like me. I thought Roger's comments today were pretty insightful - I'm hoping my impression will be either rejected or confirmed. Here's what Roger had to say about the FED: "A great much of what we have discussed over the past year in relation to the FED has been in understanding the standard operating procedures the FED operates by as determined by the Chairman, Dr. Greenspan. He has done a spectacular job of implementing SOP and in so doing has created transparency in the way the FED determines monetary policy. This has taken away much of the mystique and confusion about how the FED operates during Dr. Greenspan's tenure. That is a very good thing.One of the key points in SOP has been that the FED will manage monetary policy preemptively on inflation and reactively on deflation.On InflationWhat this means is that the FED will raise rates and restrict money supply growth if they anticipate the potential for inflation increasing above their target comfort level BEFORE the economic indicators validate that this is occurring. This was actually first begun by Chairman Paul Volcker in the early eighties as a means of getting ahead of the inflation rate by driving short term rates up so fast that they stopped economic activity in its tracks and resulted in a recession in 1982 as a result. He didn't have to bring the economy to a screeching halt as fast as he did but I am not going to waste time debating that here. Ever since then however the FED has taken a preemptive approach on inflation.On DeflationAs the US economy and the FED have not had to deal with the prospects of a real deflationary environment since the 1930's there has been no need for the FED to alter its policy on deflation or even overtly define a policy on deflation. The policy has been by default to be reactive on deflation. Which means move rates down and increase money supply only AFTER economic reports have validated the slow down is ocurring and has ocuurde in the recent past. Prior to the hyper-inflationary environment of the late 1970's the overall monetary policy was to be reactive on both inflation and deflation. This philosophy was one of the reasons that monetary policy failed in the 1970's. And as well was one of the reasons that caused the inflation to get out of control and mandating an aggressive response. Since then very few have questioned the need for the FED to be preemptive on inflation. A debate in reference to this is warranted however and should be had. I will not have that debate here now though. The big point to understand about the FED's move last week and Dr. Greenspans testimony before the Joint economic committee a few days ago is that the FED is now clearly in the preemptive camp when it comes to managing monetary policy during economic slow downs. This is, in my opinion, the largest shift in FED SOP that has occurred during Dr. Greenspans tenure.We first began seeing the inklings about this this past June when the FED published a report comparing the deflation in Japan during the 1990's to the direction the US Economy is going in now. In that report the FED concluded among other things that the best way to attempt to stop deflation is to aggressively lower over night lending rates and increase money supply AHEAD of the increasing potential and probability of deflation.I then wrote about this potential shift in policy just prior to the August FOMC meeting and the internal conflict at the FED about the potential for this transition.Although no articles have been written about this particular subject within the mainstream press that I am aware of there are many articles that have been written about the FED's philosophy and what a change in philosophy could mean to investors. The conclusion most have drawn is that a change in FED philosophy, in the way they manage monetary policy, would be bad. The rationale for this conclusion would be that the FED has realized that their policy is not working and must change course to avoid a disaster. Investors it was postulated would pick up on this and perhaps panic, selling paper assets and actually making the problem worse than it was prior to the change in procedures. In other words the FED didn't want to rock the boat. It wanted to maintain an "even strain".The idea being that FED appearance is far more important to the markets than actual monetary policy. The FED had to appear to be in control even if they weren't. That philosophy was abandoned last week. What is most fascinating about this to me is that nobody anywhere appears to have picked up on this.During Dr. Greenspans testimony before congress two days ago he clearly signaled that the FEDs concern over potential deflation was greater than the FED's concern over potential inflation and as such was the reason for moving the FED funds rate 50 basis points down instead of the widely anticipated 25. About 20% of the poled investment banking economists last week anticipated a no move by the FED. About 60% anticipated 25 basis points down. And, only 20% anticipated a 50 basis point move down. This is a much wider range of opinions that is normal; signaling a growing migration of the FED away from its SOP and being reflected in the lack of transparency and confusion among FED watchers. Back to Dr. Greenspans testimony.What was even more startling about Dr. Greenspans testimony were his comments during the questions and answer section. When asked about the possibility of the deflation increasing and the FED reaching a zero rate policy Dr. Greenspan replied, as paraphrased by me:He did not believe that there would be general deflation in the US economy but that if that were to occur that the fed has other options available to it. Those other options as stated by him centered on being able to "move out on the maturity curve" with respect to rates. This was a clear signal that the FED is ready to buy long term US treasuries with the expressed goal of driving down long term yields, specifically the 10 year treasury yield. This was an awesome statement.The FED buys and sells US treasuries all day long in an attempt to balance its own portfolio of about 700 billion dollars with respect to and as a reflection of what the bond market is indicating in reference to future economic activity in the US economy. In other words the FED in general does not buy and sell long term treasuries in an attempt to overtly manipulate the yields and thus lending rates.Dr. Greenspan stated explicitly that the FED can and will do this if necessary.I will explain what his means.Most corporate borrowing is done based on short term interest rates. The FED's manipulation of short term rates in setting the FED funds rate is a means of primarily affecting corporate borrowing activity, not consumer borrowing activity.Most consumer borrowing is tied to long term rates; i.e. the 10 year US treasury yield. 30 year fixed rate mortgage rates, for example, are tied to the yield on the 10 year US treasury.What Dr. Greenspan was implying and assuring corporate money managers was that if corporate borrowing did not pick up soon he would target consumer borrowing instead.By extension we can infer that Dr. Greenspan'a real meaning and the message he wanted to deliver to corporate America is that the FED will not allow there to be a consumer capitulation. Dr. Greenspan, I am sure, understands that catch 22 we have talked about in reference to the economic cycle. That being that economic cycles are self fulfilling. Consumer capitulation has always been the signal of the bottom of an economic cycle. We have not yet had a consumer capitulation. Corporations will not borrow until there is a consumer capitulation. Because corporations are not borrowing real economic activity and revenues begin to fall. The only way, in a falling revenue environment directly caused by general economic weakness, for companies to increase earnings is to reduce expenses. The largest single expense at a company is almost universally people. Firing people becomes the fastest method to reducing costs. As unemployment rises consumers begin to slow spending culminating in a capitulation. Get it? The economic cycle catch 22.Dr. Greenspan is signaling to companies that A) he understands that they are not borrowing because they are worried that there will be a consumer capitulation, and B) that he will not allow it to happen and C) so companies might as well go ahead and starting borrowing, spending and investing now.So, the question now is what will companies believe and do?Will CEO's buy the fact that the FED can supersede the business cycle using monetary policy to manipulate consumers into continuing to borrow and spend causing the capitulation to NOT occur and allowing companies to confidently begin borrowing, spending and investing?OrWill CEO's stand fast and play the I'll believe it when I see it game. I suspect that if the FED is to have any credibility with corporate America in this regard that it will have to start buying up long term US treasuries ahead of any corporate activity as a means of giving credence to their promise.This would result in falling long term treasury yields; namely the 10 year US treasury, dramatically. I say dramatically because the FED would have to show without overtly saying so that their buying is the resaon for the reduction in treasury yields and that no other rationale conclusion coule be drawn by CEO's. This would drive mortgage rates even lower and perhaps even spark another round of refinancing and spending on the part of consumers.This is all new ground. Can the FED supersede the business cycle? It's less about real monetary policy and more about how good a salesman Dr. Greenspan is at making corporations believe he can deliver. Because if they believe he can deliver they actually make the belief happen.Get it?Personally, I think it will fail. I don't think corporate America is going to buy the idea that the FED will disallow the consumer capitulation. CEO's have told as much in the last 6 months as well. The equity markets however are right now putting more belief in Dr. Greenspan and his ability to manipulate the economy than the CEO's of the companies they are trading in. It's a strange world. I think traders believe what they want to believe because facing the idea that the Chairman has no clothes is too scary. Solomon Weaver (11/15/02; 17:45:07MT - usagold.com msg#: 89728) All in all - just another (gold) brick in the wall REUTERS November 12, 2002 3:18:00 PM ET"Newmont shrank its forward sales by 928,000 ounces to 5.8 million ounces during the third quarter, roughly equivalent to 10 months of production, and expects a further reduction of at least 279,000 ounces in the fourth quarter. It inherited a hedge book of about 10 million ounces from Normandy"I have not been here very much lately....but I just noticed that the largest gold company in the world announced in its earning reports that it continues to unwind the Normandy hedgebook it "inherited".Poor old Solomon TownCrier (11/15/02; 17:16:59MT - usagold.com msg#: 89727) A timely update! Read Monday's "CB Insider"... today!